IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i18p4876-d1748948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Assessment of Anaerobic Digestion Performance and Efficiency in Terms of Waste Collection

Author

Listed:
  • Przemysław Seruga

    (Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Faculty of Production Engineering, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Marta Wilk

    (Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Faculty of Production Engineering, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Edmund Cibis

    (Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Faculty of Production Engineering, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Urbanowska

    (Department of Water, Wastewater and Waste Technology, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wyb. Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Łukasz Niedźwiecki

    (Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, via Mesiano 77, 38123 Trento, Italy)

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) management is identified as a significant sustainability concern. Source segregation (SS) is the most effective method of managing MSW, and anaerobic digestion (AD) is the most efficient treatment method. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of waste collection rules on the efficiency and performance of AD. The potential biomethane yields for SS-kitchen waste and SS-biowaste were calculated, determined in laboratory tests, and verified full-scale. The content of the organic fraction in SS-biowaste reached about 81 to 86%; however, regarding SS-kitchen waste, it reached almost 92%. The primary contaminants were plastics. The obtained biogas yield was slightly higher for SS-kitchen waste (136.2 m 3 /ton), compared to SS-biowaste (116.6 m 3 /ton). The pH values, acidity, and alkalinity indicated no risk of exploitation using both feedstocks. However, in the case of SS-kitchen waste, the acetic acid content was about 2.5 times higher than that of SS-biowaste. Furthermore, the acetic acid was noted in the outlet section (about 140–160 mg/kg), indicating no complete organic matter decomposition. Regarding SS-kitchen waste, the calculated methane yield reached 137.1 m 3 CH4 /ton and laboratory tests showed a methanogenic potential of 129.7 m 3 CH4 /ton, while at full-scale, it reached about 82.2 m 3 CH 4 /ton. The research confirmed that the SS of biowaste positively impacts MSW management by improving waste composition and increasing recycling possibilities. AD is an effective biowaste treatment process, allowing energy recovery from waste.

Suggested Citation

  • Przemysław Seruga & Marta Wilk & Edmund Cibis & Agnieszka Urbanowska & Łukasz Niedźwiecki, 2025. "The Assessment of Anaerobic Digestion Performance and Efficiency in Terms of Waste Collection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:4876-:d:1748948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/4876/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/18/4876/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:18:p:4876-:d:1748948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.