IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1083-d1027397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Municipal Solid Waste Collection: Challenges, Strategies and Perspectives in the Optimization of a Municipal Route in a Southern Mexican Town

Author

Listed:
  • Viridiana Del Carmen-Niño

    (School of Sustainable Development, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Carretera Nacional Acapulco-Zihuatanejo km 106+900, Colonia Las Tunas, Tecpan de Galeana 40900, Guerrero, Mexico)

  • Ricardo Herrera-Navarrete

    (PhD in Environmental Sciences, Regional Development Sciences Center, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Calle Privada de Laurel No. 13, Colonia El Roble, Acapulco 39640, Guerrero, Mexico)

  • Ana Laura Juárez-López

    (PhD in Environmental Sciences, Regional Development Sciences Center, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Calle Privada de Laurel No. 13, Colonia El Roble, Acapulco 39640, Guerrero, Mexico)

  • María Laura Sampedro-Rosas

    (PhD in Environmental Sciences, Regional Development Sciences Center, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Calle Privada de Laurel No. 13, Colonia El Roble, Acapulco 39640, Guerrero, Mexico)

  • Maximino Reyes-Umaña

    (PhD in Environmental Sciences, Regional Development Sciences Center, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Calle Privada de Laurel No. 13, Colonia El Roble, Acapulco 39640, Guerrero, Mexico)

Abstract

Solid waste management represents a challenge for municipalities, particularly at the collection stage. The high costs involved in its operation make it difficult to provide the service in all its communities, which results in bad practices (burning, burying, or dumping into a river) and the proliferation of open dumps. Collection efficiency is aggravated by poor route planning, narrow road networks, and irregular scheduling. This research proposes and develops the following objectives: (1) an analysis of the technical and logistical conditions of a town, (2) an improved municipal route for waste collection, and (3) the practical implications identified in the optimization of the service (challenges, strategies, and perspectives). During the study period (2018, 2019 and 2021), the following steps were carried out: (1) field trips to monitor the formal and informal routes, georeferencing each stop with a global positioning system, (2) semi-structured interviews to route personnel to learn about technical and logistical aspects, (3) the downloading of cartographic data for digitization, and (4) a network analysis aimed at designing an optimal route for formal collection and the spatial scope of the informal routes. The current technical and logistical analysis detected inefficiency in collection due to weak municipal operational planning and the irregular frequency of visits to the locality. The locality produces an average of 2.8 tons per day and its largest volume is organic waste (68.3%), followed by non-recyclable inorganic waste (21.2%), and recyclable waste (10.5%). In terms of results for the optimization of the municipal collection route, it is estimated that there will be an improvement in the time of the day of approximately 2 h less, going through 95 points when its schedule is 60 collection points, while the distance factor does not suffer changes due to the fact that there are no alternate routes between the departure and destination route. Among the main challenges faced by the municipalities are the limited budgets for basic sanitation services, which is why technological strategies and trained human resources are required for better municipal solid waste management. From a technical perspective, geographic information systems are a current trend to model and optimize service routes, with which a better scenario can be proposed. From a social perspective, community participation works as a key factor to carry out activities focused on finding solutions to the problems related to municipal solid waste management.

Suggested Citation

  • Viridiana Del Carmen-Niño & Ricardo Herrera-Navarrete & Ana Laura Juárez-López & María Laura Sampedro-Rosas & Maximino Reyes-Umaña, 2023. "Municipal Solid Waste Collection: Challenges, Strategies and Perspectives in the Optimization of a Municipal Route in a Southern Mexican Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1083-:d:1027397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1083/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1083/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed Shaban & Fatma-Elzahraa Zaki & Islam H. Afefy & Giulio Di Gravio & Andrea Falegnami & Riccardo Patriarca, 2022. "An Optimization Model for the Design of a Sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Management System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Paula Llanquileo-Melgarejo & María Molinos-Senante & Giulia Romano & Laura Carosi, 2021. "Evaluation of the Impact of Separative Collection and Recycling of Municipal Solid Waste on Performance: An Empirical Application for Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Elena Cristina Rada & Claudio Zatelli & Lucian Ionel Cioca & Vincenzo Torretta, 2018. "Selective Collection Quality Index for Municipal Solid Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Abdullah Al Mamun & Muhammad Mohiuddin & Ghazali Bin Ahmad & Ramayah Thurasamy & Syed Ali Fazal, 2018. "Recycling Intention and Behavior among Low-Income Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Abdul Majeed Aslam Saja & Abdul Majeed Zarafath Zimar & Sainulabdeen Mohamed Junaideen, 2021. "Municipal Solid Waste Management Practices and Challenges in the Southeastern Coastal Cities of Sri Lanka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Marco Ragazzi & Riccardo Catellani & Elena Cristina Rada & Vincenzo Torretta & Xavier Salazar-Valenzuela, 2014. "Management of Municipal Solid Waste in One of the Galapagos Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Simona Ciuta & Tiberiu Apostol & Valentin Rusu, 2015. "Urban and Rural MSW Stream Characterization for Separate Collection Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ömer Apaydin & Gül Sümeyra Akçay Han, 2023. "Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Collection Methods Focusing on Zero-Waste Management Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Towhid Babazadeh & Haidar Nadrian & Mohammad Mosaferi & Hamid Allahverdipour, 2018. "Identifying Challenges and Barriers to Participating in the Source Separation of Waste Program in Tabriz, Northwest of Iran: A Qualitative Study from the Citizens’ Perspective," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Muhammad Yaseen Bhutto & Yasir Ali Soomro & Hailan Yang, 2022. "Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Young Consumer Purchase Behavior of Energy-Efficient Appliances (Evidence From Developing Economy)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    3. Mutu Tantrige Osada Vishvajith Peiris & Gileemalege Lalithri Navodya Dayarathne, 2023. "Application of Life Cycle Framework for Municipal Solid Waste Management: a Circular Economy Perspective from Developing Countries," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    4. Andrés Pazmiño & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Darryl Low Choy, 2018. "Towards Comprehensive Policy Integration for the Sustainability of Small Islands: A Landscape-Scale Planning Approach for the Galápagos Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-29, April.
    5. Yaprak Kurtsal & Davide Viaggi, 2020. "Exploring Collaboration and Consumer Behavior in Food Community Networks and Constraints Preventing Active Participation: The Case of Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Romano, Giulia & Molinos-Senante, María & Carosi, Laura & Llanquileo-Melgarejo, Paula & Sala-Garrido, Ramón & Mocholi-Arce, Manuel, 2021. "Assessing the dynamic eco-efficiency of Italian municipalities by accounting for the ownership of the entrusted waste utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Julio César Puche-Regaliza & Santiago Porras-Alfonso & Alfredo Jiménez & Santiago Aparicio-Castillo & Pablo Arranz-Val, 2021. "Exploring determinants of public satisfaction with urban solid waste collection services quality," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 9927-9948, July.
    8. Cristina Mateus & Melanie Valencia & Kara DiFrancesco & Valeria Ochoa-Herrera & Todd Gartner & Diego Quiroga, 2020. "Governance Mechanisms and Barriers for Achieving Water Quality Improvements in Galapagos," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Paul Taboada-González & Quetzalli Aguilar-Virgen & Liliana Márquez-Benavides, 2017. "Recyclables Valorisation as the Best Strategy for Achieving Landfill CO 2 e Emissions Abatement from Domestic Waste: Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-10, July.
    10. Elena Cristina Rada & Elena Romenovna Magaril & Marco Schiavon & Anzhelika Karaeva & Maxim Chashchin & Vincenzo Torretta, 2020. "MSW Management in Universities: Sharing Best Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Valentin Grecu & Radu-Ilie-Gabriel Ciobotea & Adrian Florea, 2020. "Software Application for Organizational Sustainability Performance Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, May.
    12. Giulia Costa & Alessio Lieto & Francesco Lombardi, 2019. "LCA of a Consortium-Based MSW Management System to Quantify the Decrease in Environmental Impacts Achieved for Increasing Separate Collection Rates and Other Modifications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Yi-Tui Chen & Fu-Chiang Yang & Shih-Heng Yu, 2017. "The Diffusion Effect of MSW Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Adrian Dumitru Tantau & Maria Alexandra Maassen & Laurentiu Fratila, 2018. "Models for Analyzing the Dependencies between Indicators for a Circular Economy in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    15. Maria Molinos-Senante & Alexandros Maziotis, 2021. "The Cost of Reducing Municipal Unsorted Solid Waste: Evidence from Municipalities in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Yang, Xisi & Thøgersen, John, 2022. "When people are green and greedy: A new perspective of recycling rewards and crowding-out in Germany, the USA and China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 217-235.
    17. Mats Wilhelmsson, 2022. "About the Importance of Planning the Location of Recycling Stations in the Urban Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Florin Constantin Mihai, 2016. "East European recycling societies: The first steps of rural communities in Neamt County, Romania," Post-Print hal-01375664, HAL.
    19. Madalina-Ioana BADILA & Ghita BARSAN & Danut-Eugeniu MOSTEANU & Benoni SFARLOG & Ruxandra MOSTEANU, 2018. "The Place Of Wics Model In The Governance Of An Automotive Systems Corporation," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 733-740, November.
    20. Navarro Ferronato & Máximo Lucio Nova Pinedo & Vincenzo Torretta, 2020. "Assessment of Used Baby Diapers Composting in Bolivia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1083-:d:1027397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.