IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i11p15384-15399d59124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Biomass Yield and Water Treatment in Two Aquaponic Systems Using the Dynamic Root Floating Technique (DRF)

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Silva

    (Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN-CINVESTAV, Km 6 Antigua Carretera a Progreso, C.P. 97310 Mérida, Mexico)

  • Eucario Gasca-Leyva

    (Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN-CINVESTAV, Km 6 Antigua Carretera a Progreso, C.P. 97310 Mérida, Mexico)

  • Edgardo Escalante

    (Centro Regional Universitario de la Península de Yucatán, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Ex Hacienda Temozón Norte, C.P. 97310 Mérida, Mexico)

  • Kevin M. Fitzsimmons

    (Department of Soil Water and Environmental Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Arizona, P.O. Box 210038, Tucson, AZ 85721-0038, USA)

  • David Valdés Lozano

    (Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN-CINVESTAV, Km 6 Antigua Carretera a Progreso, C.P. 97310 Mérida, Mexico)

Abstract

The experiment evaluates the food production and water treatment of TAN, NO 2 − –N, NO 3 − –N, and PO 4 3− in two aquaponics systems using the dynamic root floating technique (DRF). A separate recirculation aquaculture system (RAS) was used as a control. The fish cultured was Nile tilapia ( Oreochromis niloticus ). The hydroponic culture in one treatment (PAK) was pak choy ( Brassica chinensis, ) and in the other (COR) coriander ( Coriandrum sativum ). Initial and final weights were determined for the fish culture. Final edible fresh weight was determined for the hydroponic plant culture. TAN, NO 2 − –N, NO 3 − –N, and PO 4 3− were measured in fish culture and hydroponic culture once a week at two times, morning (9:00 a.m.) and afternoon (3:00 p.m.). The fish biomass production was not different in any treatment ( p > 0.05) and the total plant yield was greater ( p < 0.05) in PAK than in COR. For the hydroponic culture in the a.m., the PO 4 3− was lower ( p < 0.05) in the PAK treatment than in COR, and in the p.m. NO 3 − –N and PO 4 3− were lower ( p < 0.05) in PAK than in COR. The PAK treatment demonstrated higher food production and water treatment efficiency than the other two treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Silva & Eucario Gasca-Leyva & Edgardo Escalante & Kevin M. Fitzsimmons & David Valdés Lozano, 2015. "Evaluation of Biomass Yield and Water Treatment in Two Aquaponic Systems Using the Dynamic Root Floating Technique (DRF)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:11:p:15384-15399:d:59124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/11/15384/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/11/15384/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Poot-López, Gaspar Román & Hernández, Juan M. & Gasca-Leyva, Eucario, 2010. "Input management in integrated agriculture-aquaculture systems in Yucatan: Tree spinach leaves as a dietary supplement in tilapia culture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 98-104, February.
    2. Ariel E. Turcios & Jutta Papenbrock, 2014. "Sustainable Treatment of Aquaculture Effluents—What Can We Learn from the Past for the Future?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Costache, Mioara & Sebastian Cristea, Dragos & Petrea, Stefan-Mihai & Neculita, Mihaela & Rahoveanu, Maria Magdalena Turek & Simionov, Ira-Adeline & Mogodan, Alina & Sarpe, Daniela & Rahoveanu, Adrian, 2021. "Integrating aquaponics production systems into the Romanian green procurement network," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatima Yahya & Antoine El Samrani & Mohamad Khalil & Alaa El-Din Abdin & Rasha El-Kholy & Mohamed Embaby & Mohab Negm & Dirk De Ketelaere & Anna Spiteri & Eleanna Pana & Vasileios Takavakoglou, 2023. "Decentralized Wetland-Aquaponics Addressing Environmental Degradation and Food Security Challenges in Disadvantaged Rural Areas: A Nature-Based Solution Driven by Mediterranean Living Labs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Christopher Shaw & Klaus Knopf & Werner Kloas, 2022. "Toward Feeds for Circular Multitrophic Food Production Systems: Holistically Evaluating Growth Performance and Nutrient Excretion of African Catfish Fed Fish Meal-Free Diets in Comparison to Nile Tila," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-31, November.
    3. József Popp & László Váradi & Emese Békefi & András Péteri & Gergő Gyalog & Zoltán Lakner & Judit Oláh, 2018. "Evolution of Integrated Open Aquaculture Systems in Hungary: Results from a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Simon Goddek & Boris Delaide & Utra Mankasingh & Kristin Vala Ragnarsdottir & Haissam Jijakli & Ragnheidur Thorarinsdottir, 2015. "Challenges of Sustainable and Commercial Aquaponics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-26, April.
    5. Anderson Coldebella & André Luis Gentelini & Pitágoras Augusto Piana & Priscila Ferri Coldebella & Wilson Rogério Boscolo & Aldi Feiden, 2017. "Effluents from Fish Farming Ponds: A View from the Perspective of Its Main Components," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Christopher Shaw & Klaus Knopf & Werner Kloas, 2022. "Fish Feeds in Aquaponics and Beyond: A Novel Concept to Evaluate Protein Sources in Diets for Circular Multitrophic Food Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-30, March.
    7. Ariel E. Turcios & Marie Hielscher & Bernardo Duarte & Vanessa F. Fonseca & Isabel Caçador & Jutta Papenbrock, 2021. "Screening of Emerging Pollutants (EPs) in Estuarine Water and Phytoremediation Capacity of Tripolium pannonicum under Controlled Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Christopher Shaw & Klaus Knopf & Laura Klatt & Gabina Marin Arellano & Werner Kloas, 2023. "Closing Nutrient Cycles through the Use of System-Internal Resource Streams: Implications for Circular Multitrophic Food Production Systems and Aquaponic Feed Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-30, April.
    9. Khiari, Zied & Alka, Kumari & Kelloway, Stephen & Mason, Beth & Savidov, Nick, 2020. "Integration of Biochar Filtration into Aquaponics: Effects on Particle Size Distribution and Turbidity Removal," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    10. Domínguez-May, Roger & Poot-López, Gaspar R. & Hernández, Juan & Gasca-Leyva, Eucario, 2020. "Dynamic optimal ration size in tilapia culture: Economic and environmental considerations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 420(C).
    11. Thomas, Ritty Maria & Verma, Ajit Kumar & Prakash, Chandra & Krishna, Hari & Prakash, Satya & Kumar, Ashok, 2019. "Utilization of Inland saline underground water for bio-integration of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 154-160.
    12. Mónica R. Diaz & Javier Araneda & Andrea Osses & Jaime Orellana & José A. Gallardo, 2020. "Efficiency of Salicornia neei to Treat Aquaculture Effluent from a Hypersaline and Artificial Wetland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Jan Klein & Andrea Schüch & Phillip Sandmann & Michael Nelles & Harry Wilhelm Palm & Adrian Bischoff, 2023. "Utilization of Sludge from African Catfish ( Clarias gariepinus ) Recirculating Aquaculture Systems for Vermifiltration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Delaide, Boris & Teerlinck, Stefan & Decombel, An & Bleyaert, Peter, 2019. "Effect of wastewater from a pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) recirculated aquaculture system on hydroponic tomato production and quality," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    15. Aamir Mehmood Shah & Gengyuan Liu & Fanxin Meng & Qing Yang & Jingyan Xue & Stefano Dumontet & Renato Passaro & Marco Casazza, 2021. "A Review of Urban Green and Blue Infrastructure from the Perspective of Food-Energy-Water Nexus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    16. Yilong Hao & Kai Ding & Yaoyang Xu & Yuting Tang & Dong Liu & Gang Li, 2020. "States, Trends, and Future of Aquaponics Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Ana Paula Monschau Funck & José Antônio Beirão Simões & Edenilce de Fátima & Luciano dos, Santos Rodrigues & Marilia Martins Melo & Kleber Campos Miranda Filho & Marina Guimarães Ferreira & Fabi, 2019. "Water Quality and Effluents Generated during Rainbow Trout Culture in a Raceway System," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, April.
    18. Magwaza, Shirly Tentile & Magwaza, Lembe Samukelo & Odindo, Alfred Oduor & Mashilo, Jacob & Mditshwa, Asanda & Buckley, Chris, 2020. "Evaluating the feasibility of human excreta-derived material for the production of hydroponically grown tomato plants - Part I: Photosynthetic efficiency, leaf gas exchange and tissue mineral content," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    19. Bea-Ven Chang & Chien-Sen Liao & Yi-Tang Chang & Wei-Liang Chao & Shinn-Lih Yeh & Dong-Lin Kuo & Chu-Wen Yang, 2019. "Investigation of a Farm-scale Multitrophic Recirculating Aquaculture System with the Addition of Rhodovulum sulfidophilum for Milkfish ( Chanos chanos ) Coastal Aquaculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:11:p:15384-15399:d:59124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.