IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4075-d1647136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Typologies of Transformation—Visualizing Different Understandings of Change for Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Tegan Evans

    (Centre for Blue Governance, Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth P01 3DE, UK)

  • Stephen Fletcher

    (School of the Environment and Life Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Burnaby Building, Portsmouth P01 3DE, UK)

  • Pierre Failler

    (Centre for Blue Governance, Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth P01 3DE, UK
    Economics and Finance Group, Portsmouth Business School, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth P01 3DE, UK)

  • Jonathan Potts

    (School of the Environment and Life Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Burnaby Building, Portsmouth P01 3DE, UK)

Abstract

Transformation as a concept is positioned as a solution to diverse societal and planetary crises; however, increasing diversity in the demands for transformation have led to different interpretations of how transformation should be achieved in practice. This article explores the results of a three-year mixed-methods study, which included a literature review, semi-structured expert and practitioner interviews, and two case studies of transformation in motion. Using inductive analytical processes, two distinct and often conflicting interpretations of transformation emerged, which this article positions as a typology of transformation to visually understand and delineate between interpretations of transformation. Bridging these polarised interpretations is challenging, although a significant portion of the interviewees identified the need for both understandings to be used in practice. It is argued that the lack of visibility regarding these different interpretations of transformation is a major barrier to implementing change in practice; without being clear of what personal definitions of transformation are at play, it is challenging to chart a path forward to create change. Being explicit regarding which interpretations of transformation are at play in varying demands for change will enable more efficient and effective communication, although significant research is needed to bridge these understandings.

Suggested Citation

  • Tegan Evans & Stephen Fletcher & Pierre Failler & Jonathan Potts, 2025. "Typologies of Transformation—Visualizing Different Understandings of Change for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4075-:d:1647136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4075/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4075/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ross Gillard & Andrew Gouldson & Jouni Paavola & James Van Alstine, 2016. "Transformational responses to climate change: beyond a systems perspective of social change in mitigation and adaptation," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 251-265, March.
    2. Tiffany H. Morrison & W. Neil Adger & Arun Agrawal & Katrina Brown & Matthew J. Hornsey & Terry P. Hughes & Meha Jain & Maria Carmen Lemos & Lucy Holmes McHugh & Saffron O’Neill & Derek Berkel, 2022. "Radical interventions for climate-impacted systems," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(12), pages 1100-1106, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ciska Ulug & Lummina Horlings & Elen-Maarja Trell, 2021. "Collective Identity Supporting Sustainability Transformations in Ecovillage Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Kılkış, Şiir & Ulpiani, Giulia & Vetters, Nadja, 2024. "Visions for climate neutrality and opportunities for co-learning in European cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Angga Pradesha & Sherman Robinson & Mark W. Rosegrant & Nicostrato Perez & Timothy S. Thomas, 2022. "Exploring transformational adaptation strategy through agricultural policy reform in the Philippines," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(6), pages 1435-1447, December.
    4. Panahi, Roozbeh & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Pang, Jiayi, 2020. "Climate change adaptation in the port industry: A complex of lingering research gaps and uncertainties," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 10-29.
    5. Yuge Ma & Thomas F. Thornton & Diana Mangalagiu & Jing Lan & Dina Hestad & Elena Apostoli Cappello & Sander Leeuw, 2020. "Co-creation, co-evolution and co-governance: understanding green businesses and urban transformations," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 621-636, June.
    6. Maurice Skelton, 2020. "How cognitive links and decision-making capacity shape sectoral experts’ recognition of climate knowledge for adaptation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1535-1553, October.
    7. Samuel Pearson & Matthew J. Hornsey & Saphira Rekker & Belinda Wade & Chris Greig, 2024. "Publicly expressed climate scepticism is greatest in regions with high CO2 emissions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(5), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Kythreotis, Andrew P. & Hannaford, Matthew & Howarth, Candice & Bosworth, Gary, 2024. "Translating climate risk assessments into more effective adaptation decision-making: the importance of social and political aspects of place-based climate risk," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122155, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Guogang Wang & Shengnan Huang & Yongxiang Zhang & Sicheng Zhao & Chengji Han, 2022. "How Has Climate Change Driven the Evolution of Rice Distribution in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Chad M. Baum & Livia Fritz & Sean Low & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2024. "Public perceptions and support of climate intervention technologies across the Global North and Global South," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Gaitan Thierry Seutchueng Tchuenga & Mesmin Tchindjang & Precillia Ijang Tata Ngome & Ann Degrande & Simon Djakba Basga & Frédéric Saha, 2024. "Agricultural Innovations and Adaptations to Climate Change in the Northern Cameroon Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Schneider, Kate R & Remans, Roseline & Bekele, Tesfaye Hailu & Aytekin, Destan & Conforti, Piero & Dasgupta, Shouro & DeClerck, Fabrice & Dewi, Deviana & Fabi, Carola & Gephart, Jessica A & Masuda, Yu, 2025. "Governance and resilience as entry points for transforming food systems in the countdown to 2030," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127092, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Annamaria Di Fabio & Andrea Svicher, 2023. "The Eco-Generativity Scale (EGS): A New Resource to Protect the Environment and Promote Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Xinwei Guo & Bin Yu & Meiyan Yan & Hui Guo & Junhu Ren & Hanxia Zhang & Zonggang Zhang, 2022. "Endogenous Development Models and Paths Selection of Rural Revitalization from the Perspective of Ecological Environment Advantages: A Case Study of Nanshi Village, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, September.
    15. Cheng Wang & Tao Lv & Rongjiang Cai & Jianfeng Xu & Liya Wang, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Multi-Level Perspective on Sustainability Transition Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-31, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4075-:d:1647136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.