Author
Listed:
- Liwei Zhao
(College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi 435002, China)
- Qiaobing Yue
(College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi 435002, China)
- Junhong Liang
(College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi 435002, China)
- Shiyi Cheng
(College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi 435002, China)
Abstract
Rural livability is the essence of people’s well-being and rural revitalization, in which social networks in daily life play important roles. However, the role of social interactions has long been ignored. This study aims to develop an index system for rural livability evaluation considering social interactions. We chose Ezhou city as an example, and two potential social networks were constructed, and the multi-scale characteristics of social networks at the village level and patch level were used as the proxy indicator of social convenience, then together with ecological livability and economic vitality to comprehensively evaluate rural livability. The empirical results showed a heterogeneous spatial distribution in two social networks. It also presented a tendency of “poor social convenience, general economic vitality and benign ecological livability” of rural areas in each dimension, and a complex pattern of stripped and concentric distribution in the spatial distribution of the total rural livability. It further verified that the social interactions had a direct impact on rural livability by a comparison of two evaluation results. This study advances our understanding of the role of social interactions in rural livability evaluation and provide reasonable suggestions for policymakers in future construction of livable countryside.
Suggested Citation
Liwei Zhao & Qiaobing Yue & Junhong Liang & Shiyi Cheng, 2025.
"Evaluation of Rural Livability Considering Social Interactions and Implications for Rural Revitalization: A Case Study of Ezhou City, China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-20, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3989-:d:1645075
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3989-:d:1645075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.