IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3876-d1642407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Evolution Characteristics of Policy System That Supports the Sustainability of Digital Economy: Text Analysis Based on China’s Digital Economy Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Li Cai

    (School of Marxism, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Jianhua Xiao

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Renxian Zuo

    (School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

The high-quality and sustainable development of the digital economy cannot be achieved without the support of the policy system. The purpose of this article is to scientifically analyze the laws and characteristics of the policy system that supports the sustainability of the digital economy. Specifically, based on public policy theory, this article constructs an analytical framework of “policy objectives—policy tools—organizational management” and incorporates the “central-local” relationship with Chinese characteristics into the framework. Meanwhile, text analysis was used to quantitatively analyze 971 digital economy policies issued by the central and local governments in China from 2000 to 2022. Research shows that the central government of China has taken the lead in introducing digital economy policies, and local governments are able to respond quickly. The central government’s digital economy policy goals fluctuate and change, while local governments pay more stable attention to the digital product service industry. Both central and local governments widely use supply oriented policy tools and environmental-oriented policy tools, while demand-oriented policy tools are not widely applied. The vertical relationship between central and local data management agencies is still unclear, and the degree of cross departmental and cross regional cooperation is not high. Meanwhile, empirical analysis based on the two-way fixed effects model shows that technological innovation, R&D funding, and industrial structure have a significant impact on changes in digital economy policies. This article summarizes the characteristics of the evolution of digital economy policies in the Chinese context, providing policy design references for promoting the sustainability of the digital economy and methodological insights for policy research in other fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Cai & Jianhua Xiao & Renxian Zuo, 2025. "Research on the Evolution Characteristics of Policy System That Supports the Sustainability of Digital Economy: Text Analysis Based on China’s Digital Economy Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-31, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3876-:d:1642407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3876/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3876/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luo, Lianfa & Liu, Peiyao & Zhu, Fangjing & Sun, Yongping & Liu, Lingna, 2022. "Policy objective bias and institutional quality improvement: Sustainable development of resource-based cities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Ling, Shixian & Gao, Hongfu & Yuan, Di, 2024. "Catalytic role of the digital economy in fostering corporate green technology innovation: a mechanism for sustainability transformation in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 278-292.
    3. Jiaoning Zhang & Xiaoyu Ma & Jiamin Liu, 2022. "How Can the Digital Economy and Human Capital Improve City Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Shaobin, Guo & Ahmad, Khalil & Khan, Naqib Ullah, 2024. "Natural resources, geopolitical conflicts, and digital trade: Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Zhang, Weike & Fan, Hongxia & Zhao, Qiwei, 2023. "Seeing green: How does digital infrastructure affect carbon emission intensity?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    6. Kidjie Saguin & Michael Howlett, 2022. "Enhancing Policy Capacity for Better Policy Integration: Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in a Post COVID-19 World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Herman, Peter R. & Oliver, Sarah, 2023. "Trade, policy, and economic development in the digital economy," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    8. Popkova, Elena G. & Sergi, Bruno S., 2020. "A Digital Economy to Develop Policy Related to Transport and Logistics. Predictive Lessons from Russia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Yuan Liu & Fangfang Dong & Jing Yu & Aijun Liu, 2024. "Examining the Impact of Digital Economy on Environmental Sustainability in China: Insights into Carbon Emissions and Green Growth," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 18044-18080, December.
    10. Feng, Yanchao & Gao, Yue & Xia, Xiqiang & Shi, Ke & Zhang, Ci & Yang, Le & Yang, Liwei & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier, 2024. "Identifying the path choice of digital economy to crack the “resource curse" in China from the perspective of configuration," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Li, Hao & Han, Jian & Xu, Yayun, 2023. "The effect of the digital economy on services exports competitiveness and ternary margins," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7).
    12. Min-Hyuk Cho & Chan-Goo Yi, 2022. "Adaptive Social Innovation Derived from Digital Economy and Its Impact on Society and Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Xie, Mengjun & Zhang, Chengping, 2024. "Can linguistic big data empower digital economy?: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1771-1787.
    14. Liang, Shuang & Tan, Qingmei, 2024. "Can the digital economy accelerates China's export technology upgrading? Based on the perspective of export technology complexity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    15. Xing, Huang & Feihu, Yang & Yating, Li, 2024. "Digital economy, government efficiency, and regional administrative monopolies: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1807-1819.
    16. Mervyn Stone, 2002. "Core Articles: Can Public Service Efficiency Measurement be a Useful Tool of Government? The Lesson of the Spottiswoode Report," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 33-40, July.
    17. repec:bla:pmomgt:v:22:y:2002:i:3:p:33-40 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Joana Carmo Dias, 2023. "The New Digital Economy and Sustainability: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    19. Roy Rothwell & Walter Zegveld, 1984. "An Assessment Of Government Innovation Policies," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 3(3‐4), pages 436-444, May.
    20. Sterlacchini, Alessandro, 2008. "R&D, higher education and regional growth: Uneven linkages among European regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6-7), pages 1096-1107, July.
    21. Gaofei Wang & Yi Yang, 2024. "Quantitative Evaluation of Digital Economy Policy in Heilongjiang Province of China Based on the PMC-AE Index Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, March.
    22. David Cayla, 2022. "How the Digital Economy Challenges the Neoliberal Agenda: Lessons from the Antitrust Policies," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 546-553, April.
    23. Elizabeth A. Koebele, 2021. "When multiple streams make a river: analyzing collaborative policymaking institutions using the multiple streams framework," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 609-628, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miao, Yongming & Li, Yaokuang & Wu, Yanrui, 2024. "Digital economy and economic competitive pressure on local governments: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Jingyi Liang & Cuixia Qiao, 2024. "The Impact of Digital Trade Development on Regional Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-28, November.
    3. Martina Vukašina & Ines Kersan-Škabiæ & Edvard Orliæ, 2022. "Impact of European structural and investment funds absorption on the regional development in the EU–12 (new member states)," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(4), pages 857-880, December.
    4. Maciej Jagódka & Małgorzata Snarska, 2021. "The State of Human Capital and Innovativeness of Polish Voivodships in 2004–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Jaewon Lim & Changkeun Lee & Euijune Kim, 2015. "Contributions of human capital investment policy to regional economic growth: an interregional CGE model approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 55(2), pages 269-287, December.
    6. Guofeng Wang & Baohui Zhao & Mengqi Zhao, 2024. "Investigation into the Performance Characteristics of the Organic Dry Farming Transition and the Corresponding Impact on Carbon Emissions Reduction," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao & Liu, Yong & Wang, Weilong, 2024. "Health welfare in the digital era: Exploring the impact of digital trade on residents' health," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    8. Emanuela Marrocu & Raffaele Paci & Marco Pontis, 2012. "Intangible capital and firms' productivity," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 21(2), pages 377-402, April.
    9. David Cayla, 2024. "An Agenda for a Democratic Economy," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(2), pages 556-563, April.
    10. Yelena Popova & Olegs Cernisevs & Sergejs Popovs, 2025. "Contribution to Modern Economic Region Theory: Factor of Intangible Digital Resources," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Raffaele Paci & Emanuela Marrocu, 2014. "Tourism and regional growth in Europe," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93, pages 25-50, November.
    12. Wang, Lan-Hsun & Liao, Shu-Yi & Huang, Mao-Lung, 2022. "The growth effects of knowledge-based technological change on Taiwan’s industry: A comparison of R&D and education level," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 525-545.
    13. Dimitrios Vlachopoulos & Rannveig Björk Thorkelsdóttir & Despoina Schina & Jóna Guðrún Jónsdóttir, 2023. "Teachers’ Experience and Perceptions of Sustainable Digitalization in School Education: An Existential Phenomenological Study of Teachers in Romania, Greece, Cyprus, Iceland, and The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Dodonov, Vyacheslav (Додонов, Вячеслав), 2024. "Factors of Dynamics of ICT Services Exports: The Case of Kazakhstan [Факторы Динамики Экспорта Икт-Услуг: Пример Казахстана]," Eurasian integration: economy, law, politics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, issue 2, pages 47-62.
    15. Robert Huggins & Hiro Izushi, 2013. "Knowledge-based Development in Leading Regions across the Globe: An Exploratory Analysis of the co-Evolution of Resources, Capabilities and Outputs," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(5), pages 1030-1048, April.
    16. Peiró-Palomino, Jesús & Perugini, Francesco, 2022. "Regional innovation disparities in Italy: The role of governance," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    17. Giorgio d'Agostino & Margherita Scarlato, 2015. "Innovation, Socio-institutional Conditions and Economic Growth in the Italian Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(9), pages 1514-1534, September.
    18. Lilia Patrignani, 2024. "Understanding digital trade," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 841, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    19. Wolfgang Polasek & Richard Sellner, 2013. "The Does Globalization Affect Regional Growth? Evidence for NUTS-2 Regions in EU-27," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 1, pages 23-65, March.
    20. Huanjia Ma & Raquel Ortega-Argiles & Matthew Lyons, 2024. "UK levelling up R&D mission effects: A multi-region input-output approach," MIOIR Working Paper Series 2024-03, The Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR), The University of Manchester.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3876-:d:1642407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.