IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13353-d1234146.html

Teachers’ Experience and Perceptions of Sustainable Digitalization in School Education: An Existential Phenomenological Study of Teachers in Romania, Greece, Cyprus, Iceland, and The Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitrios Vlachopoulos

    (Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Rannveig Björk Thorkelsdóttir

    (School of Education, University of Iceland, Sæmundargata 2, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland)

  • Despoina Schina

    (Stimmuli for Social Change, 15 Agias Sofias Str., GR-54623 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Jóna Guðrún Jónsdóttir

    (School of Education, University of Iceland, Sæmundargata 2, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore teachers’ awareness, experiences, and perceptions regarding the environmental impact of digitalization in school education across five European countries. Using an existential phenomenological approach, the study uncovers the lived experiences of 29 teachers, who participated in group semi-structured interviews. The findings highlight that teachers share a strong awareness of contemporary environmental challenges, such as climate change and pollution, and that environmental education is integrated into most school curricula, especially topics like recycling, composting, and pollution. Teachers express a genuine concern for educating students about global warming and its consequences, recognizing that today’s students will shape the future. Despite acknowledging the benefits of technology in education, teachers are not fully informed about the environmental impact of digitalization. The paper reveals teachers’ concerns about the energy consumption, carbon emissions, and electronic waste associated with digital technologies. Teachers propose strategies to address the environmental impact of digitalization, including prolonging device lifespans, responsible e-waste recycling, and promoting energy-efficient practices. They emphasize the need for proper teacher training in incorporating digitalization’s environmental impact into the curriculum. The study underscores the importance of engaging students through research activities, discussions, multimedia resources, and hands-on experiences to raise awareness about digitalization’s ecological footprint. Implications of a more informed and proactive approach to addressing the ecological footprint of digital technologies in school education are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitrios Vlachopoulos & Rannveig Björk Thorkelsdóttir & Despoina Schina & Jóna Guðrún Jónsdóttir, 2023. "Teachers’ Experience and Perceptions of Sustainable Digitalization in School Education: An Existential Phenomenological Study of Teachers in Romania, Greece, Cyprus, Iceland, and The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13353-:d:1234146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13353/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13353/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Thor & Peter Karlsudd, 2020. "Teaching and Fostering an Active Environmental Awareness Design, Validation and Planning for Action-Oriented Environmental Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Travis William Reynolds & Ann Bostrom & Daniel Read & M. Granger Morgan, 2010. "Now What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? Survey Studies of Educated Laypeople," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(10), pages 1520-1538, October.
    3. Abdul Karim Feroz & Hangjung Zo & Ananth Chiravuri, 2021. "Digital Transformation and Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Joana Carmo Dias, 2023. "The New Digital Economy and Sustainability: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Marius Dan Gavriletea, 2017. "Environmental Impacts of Sand Exploitation. Analysis of Sand Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Miloslav Kolenatý & Roman Kroufek & Jan Činčera, 2022. "What Triggers Climate Action: The Impact of a Climate Change Education Program on Students’ Climate Literacy and Their Willingness to Act," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Anna D’Auria & Marco Tregua & Manuel Carlos Vallejo-Martos, 2018. "Modern Conceptions of Cities as Smart and Sustainable and Their Commonalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Fengyi & Jiang, Jiahui & Ma, Jing & Liou, Jennhae, 2024. "Capital market opening, digital transformation and corporate risk-taking ——empirical evidence from Shanghai Shenzhen-Hong Kong stock connect," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    2. Mihai Felea & Ionel Bran & Dragos Bujor & Kamran Allahverdiyev, 2026. "Exploring Research Trends in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: a Bibliometric Analysis," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 28(71), pages 1-88, February.
    3. Federico Delfino & Paola Laiolo & Federico Delfino, 2019. "Living Labs and Partnerships for Progress-How Universities can Drive the Process towards the Sustainable City," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 71-73, April.
    4. Lea Primožič & Andreja Kutnar, 2022. "Sustainability Communication in Global Consumer Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Hornungová, Jana & Petrová, Kateřina, . "The Relationship Between Digital Performance and Production of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in EU Countries: Correlation Analysis and ANOVA Method," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 15(01).
    6. Mingyu Chen & William Rodger, 2026. "Artificial Intelligence and Energy Efficiency for Ecological Sustainability: Can Regulatory Quality Overcome the Net Zero Challenges in G7 Economies?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 1773-1790, April.
    7. Hui Li & Xiaqing Peng & Jingxiao Zhang & Pablo Ballesteros-Perez & Simon Patrick Philbin & Zhaoling Li & Xiaoying Tang & Jiawei Cheng, 2025. "Enabling the green total factor productivity of the construction industry with the prospect of digital transformation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 15339-15366, July.
    8. Youmeng Wu & Hao Sun & Hongliang Sun & Chi Xie, 2022. "Impact of Public Environmental Concerns on the Digital Transformation of Heavily Polluting Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Minou Ella Mebane & Maura Benedetti & Daniela Barni & Donata Francescato, 2023. "Promoting Climate Change Awareness with High School Students for a Sustainable Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Michael R. Greenberg & Marc D. Weiner & Robert Noland & Jeanne Herb & Marjorie Kaplan & Anthony J. Broccoli, 2014. "Public Support for Policies to Reduce Risk After Hurricane Sandy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(6), pages 997-1012, June.
    11. Daniel Beverungen & Thomas Hess & Antonia Köster & Christiane Lehrer, 2022. "From private digital platforms to public data spaces: implications for the digital transformation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 493-501, June.
    12. Carmen Isensee & Frank Teuteberg & Kai Michael Griese, 2022. "Exploring the Use of Mobile Apps for Fostering Sustainability-Oriented Corporate Culture: A Qualitative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, June.
    13. Dukangqi Li & Weitao Shen, 2021. "Can Corporate Digitalization Promote Green Innovation? The Moderating Roles of Internal Control and Institutional Ownership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Xiaode Ji & Yanzhao Su & Yue Zhang & Hui Wang, 2023. "Making Our Firm More Sustainable: The Role of CEO Vision Communication of Sustainability on Sustainability Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    15. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Ricardo Raimundo, 2024. "Internet of Things and Distributed Computing Systems in Business Models," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, October.
    16. Ann Bostrom & Adam L. Hayes & Katherine M. Crosman, 2019. "Efficacy, Action, and Support for Reducing Climate Change Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 805-828, April.
    17. Thomas F. Thornton & Diana Mangalagiu & Yuge Ma & Jing Lan & Mahir Yazar & Ali Kerem Saysel & Abdel Maoula Chaar, 2020. "Cultural models of and for urban sustainability: assessing beliefs about Green-Win," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 521-537, June.
    18. Raya Muttarak & Thanyaporn Chankrajang, 2015. "Who is concerned about and takes action on climate change? Gender and education divides among Thais," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 13(1), pages 193-220.
    19. Charilaos Mertzanis & Asma Houcine & Athanasios Pavlopoulos & Apostolos Vetsikas & Ilias Kampouris, 2026. "Financial Technology and Environmental Performance: International Evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 2664-2689, April.
    20. Wang, Wei & Cao, QiangYuan & Li, Zhouyang & Zhu, JinYing, 2025. "Digital transformation and corporate environmental performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13353-:d:1234146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.