IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9157-d1772372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Engagement in Digital Marketing and Environmental Management

Author

Listed:
  • Quang Linh Huynh

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam)

  • Van Kha Nguyen

    (Center for High School Education, Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam)

Abstract

This research analyzes the relationship between digital marketing, stakeholder engagement, environmental management accounting, and environmental performance of listed businesses in Vietnam. It is based on institutional theory, stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory, and signaling theory to discuss how digital tools are used not only as promotional platforms but also as strategic drivers of sustainability. Out of 500 businesses contacted, 393 valid responses were obtained from individuals responsible for marketing and sustainability decisions. Regression and mediation analyses show that digital marketing activities have a positive impact on stakeholder engagement, which in turn drives the adoption of environmental management accounting and improves environmental performance. Stakeholder engagement mediates the effects of digital marketing activities on environmental management accounting practices as well as on environmental performance. The findings suggest that unless accompanied by more significant stakeholder engagement, which helps translate such activities into formal environmental accounting practices and measurable improvements in the environment, though digital platforms enhance communication on transparency efforts. This study contributes to the integration of marketing, accounting, and sustainability research by demonstrating how digital strategies and stakeholder relations jointly influence organizational performance. In practice, it emphasizes the need for businesses to harmonize digital marketing efforts with stakeholder management to institutionalize environmental practices and enhance legitimacy perceptions among regulators, investors, and the general public.

Suggested Citation

  • Quang Linh Huynh & Van Kha Nguyen, 2025. "Stakeholder Engagement in Digital Marketing and Environmental Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9157-:d:1772372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michelle Greenwood, 2007. "Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 315-327, September.
    2. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513571011080144 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Thi Tam Le & Thi Mai Anh Nguyen & Thi Thu Hien Phan, 2019. "Environmental Management Accounting and Performance Efficiency in the Vietnamese Construction Material Industry—A Managerial Implication for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-32, September.
    4. Kristel Buysse & Alain Verbeke, 2003. "Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 453-470, May.
    5. Abdul Karim Feroz & Hangjung Zo & Ananth Chiravuri, 2021. "Digital Transformation and Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Giacomo Manetti & Marco Bellucci, 2016. "The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sustainability reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 985-1011, August.
    7. Roger L. Burritt & Stefan Schaltegger, 2010. "Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(7), pages 829-846, September.
    8. Shun-Pin Chuang & Sun-Jen Huang, 2018. "The Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility on Environmental Performance and Business Competitiveness: The Mediation of Green Information Technology Capital," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 991-1009, July.
    9. Aaron K. Chatterji & David I. Levine & Michael W. Toffel, 2009. "How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 125-169, March.
    10. Subhabrata Bobby Banerjee, 2001. "Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 489-513, June.
    11. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-08-2014-1797 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Geoff Lamberton, 2005. "Sustainability accounting—a brief history and conceptual framework," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 7-26, March.
    13. Roger L. Burritt & Stefan Schaltegger, 2010. "Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(7), pages 829-846, September.
    14. Marjan Kamyabi & Hale Özgit & Japheth Nuhu Ahmed, 2025. "Sustaining Digital Marketing Strategies to Enhance Customer Engagement and Brand Promotion: Position as a Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Giacomo Manetti & Marco Bellucci, 2016. "The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sustainability reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 985-1011, August.
    16. Luiza Dazzi Braga & Matheus Grage Tardin & Marcelo Gattermann Perin & Patricia Boaventura, 2024. "Sustainability communication in marketing: a literature review," RAUSP Management Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(3), pages 293-311, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yusheng Kong & Fahad Javed & Jahanzaib Sultan & Muhammad Shehzad Hanif & Noheed Khan, 2022. "EMA Implementation and Corporate Environmental Firm Performance: A Comparison of Institutional Pressures and Environmental Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Kaveh Asiaei & Ruzita Jusoh & Omid Barani & Arash Asiaei, 2022. "How does green intellectual capital boost performance? The mediating role of environmental performance measurement systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1587-1606, May.
    3. Javier Delgado-Ceballos & Juan Aragón-Correa & Natalia Ortiz-de-Mandojana & Antonio Rueda-Manzanares, 2012. "The Effect of Internal Barriers on the Connection Between Stakeholder Integration and Proactive Environmental Strategies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 281-293, May.
    4. Defeng Yang & Zhanqing Wang & Fangmin Lu, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Governance and Operating Characteristics on Corporate Environmental Investment: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Lino Cinquini & Emilio Passetti & Andrea Tenucci, 2016. "La sostenibilit? ambientale in azienda: quale relazione tra disclosure volontaria e gestione interna?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 15-32.
    6. Qinghai Wang & Gaoyong Li, 2024. "Research on the Effect of Corporate Environmental Responsibility on Corporate Sustainability and the Mediator Effect of Corporate Environmental Strategy," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    7. Wei Peng & Baogui Xin & Yekyung Kwon, 2019. "Optimal Strategies of Product Price, Quality, and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-24, November.
    8. Jiaxin Liu & Boram Lee & Ruth Rentschler, 2025. "Leveraging entrepreneurial identity and technology: legitimacy of art securitization platforms," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 49(2), pages 327-354, June.
    9. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    10. Zhenjie Wang & Jiewei Zhang & Hafeez Ullah, 2023. "Exploring the Multidimensional Perspective of Retail Investors’ Attention: The Mediating Influence of Corporate Governance and Information Disclosure on Corporate Environmental Performance in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-33, August.
    11. Anita Mendiratta & Shveta Singh & Surendra Singh Yadav & Arvind Mahajan, 2023. "Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis of Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 319-339, September.
    12. López-Gamero, María D. & Molina-Azorín, José F. & Claver-Cortés, Enrique, 2011. "Environmental uncertainty and environmental management perception: A multiple case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 427-435, April.
    13. A.D. Nuwan Gunarathne & Ki‐Hoon Lee & Pubudu K. Hitigala Kaluarachchilage, 2021. "Institutional pressures, environmental management strategy, and organizational performance: The role of environmental management accounting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 825-839, February.
    14. Burritt, Roger & Schaltegger, Stefan, 2014. "Accounting towards sustainability in production and supply chains," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 327-343.
    15. Daniel Zdolšek & Sabina Taškar Beloglavec, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting Ecosystem: A Once-in-a-Lifetime Overhaul during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    16. Luis Perez-Batres & Jonathan Doh & Van Miller & Michael Pisani, 2012. "Stakeholder Pressures as Determinants of CSR Strategic Choice: Why do Firms Choose Symbolic Versus Substantive Self-Regulatory Codes of Conduct?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 157-172, October.
    17. Wu, Tienhua & Jim Wu, Yen-Chun & Chen, Yenming J. & Goh, Mark, 2014. "Aligning supply chain strategy with corporate environmental strategy: A contingency approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 220-229.
    18. Albachiara Boffelli & Stefano Dotti & Paolo Gaiardelli & Giorgia Carissimi & Barbara Resta, 2019. "Corporate Environmental Management for the Textile Industry: Toward an Empirical Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-25, November.
    19. Qi Guoyou & Zeng Saixing & Tam Chiming & Yin Haitao & Zou Hailiang, 2013. "Stakeholders' Influences on Corporate Green Innovation Strategy: A Case Study of Manufacturing Firms in China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, January.
    20. Barchiesi, Maria Assunta & Fronzetti Colladon, Andrea, 2021. "Corporate core values and social responsibility: What really matters to whom," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9157-:d:1772372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.