IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3817-d1640914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Market Power Improve Corporate Carbon Efficiency? Based on Evidence from Listed Chinese Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Biqian Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China)

  • Qingyan Chen

    (School of Accounting, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Chang Zhou

    (School of Accounting, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China)

Abstract

As a key component of China’s sustainable development strategy, the “dual-carbon” goal indicates the need to actively and steadily promote carbon peaking and carbon neutrality and strengthen resource conservation and environmental protection—a core research focus published in Sustainability. Existing research in environmental economics and corporate sustainability suggests that improving carbon efficiency is a key pathway to climate-resilient industrialization, but the role of corporate market forces in this context remains under-explored. Consistent with the interdisciplinary scope of sustainability in the environmental, economic and social dimensions. This paper takes the industrial sector from 2012 to 2021 as the research sample and empirically researches and analyzes the relationship between enterprise market power and carbon efficiency and its mechanism through theoretical derivation and a fixed effect model. We found that enterprise market power is a remarkable contributor to carbon efficiency. The mechanism test found that the promotion role is reflected in the improvement of profitability, and profitability plays a mediating role in market power and carbon efficiency. In the further heterogeneity analysis, this study found that the degree of environmental information disclosure and whether an enterprise is heavily polluting present notable differences in carbon efficiency. The positive correlation between firms’ market power and carbon efficiency is more significant when firms have a lower degree of environmental information disclosure and are non heavily polluting firms. Through the expansive analysis, it is found that there is a marked cohort effect on carbon efficiency, and the market power can effectively empower the industry cohort effect of carbon efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Biqian Liu & Qingyan Chen & Chang Zhou, 2025. "Does Market Power Improve Corporate Carbon Efficiency? Based on Evidence from Listed Chinese Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3817-:d:1640914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3817/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3817/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan De Loecker & Frederic Warzynski, 2012. "Markups and Firm-Level Export Status," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2437-2471, October.
    2. Joel Peress, 2010. "Product Market Competition, Insider Trading, and Stock Market Efficiency," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 65(1), pages 1-43, February.
    3. G. E. Brandow, 1969. "Market Power and Its Sources in the Food Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 51(1), pages 1-12.
    4. Zhao, Qiuyun & Jiang, Mei & Zhao, Zuoxiang & Liu, Fan & Zhou, Li, 2024. "The impact of green innovation on carbon reduction efficiency in China: Evidence from machine learning validation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Steven T. Berry & Philip A. Haile, 2014. "Identification in Differentiated Products Markets Using Market Level Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82, pages 1749-1797, September.
    6. Datta, Sudip & Iskandar-Datta, Mai & Singh, Vivek, 2013. "Product market power, industry structure, and corporate earnings management," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 3273-3285.
    7. Robert E. Hall, 1986. "Market Structure and Macroeconomic Fluctuations," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 17(2), pages 285-338.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geoffrey Barrows & Hélène Ollivier & Ariell Reshef, 2023. "Production Function Estimation with Multi-Destination Firms," CESifo Working Paper Series 10716, CESifo.
    2. Borota Milicevic, Teodora & Carlsson, Mikael, 2016. "Markups from Inventory Data and Export Intensity," Working Paper Series 2016:9, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
    3. John Rand, 2017. "Comparing estimated and self-reported markups for formal and informal firms in an emerging market context," WIDER Working Paper Series 160, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Cecília Hornok & Balázs Muraközy, 2019. "Markups of Exporters and Importers: Evidence from Hungary," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 121(3), pages 1303-1333, July.
    5. Miller, Nathan H., 2025. "Industrial organization and The Rise of Market Power," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Nick Jacob & Giordano Mion, 2024. "On the productivity advantage of cities," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(5), pages 679-705.
    7. Flora Bellone & Patrick Musso & Lionel Nesta & Frederic Warzynski, 2016. "International trade and firm-level markups when location and quality matter," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 67-91.
    8. Békés, Gábor & Hornok, Cecília & Muraközy, Balázs, 2016. "Globalization and the markups of European firms," Kiel Working Papers 2044, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    9. Xiong, Xiancheng & Ming Chen, & Chen, Chen, 2024. "Corporate governance matters: How do reduced state-owned shares lower firms’ market power in a developing country?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 211-224.
    10. Kosuke Aoki & Yoshihiko Hogen & Kosuke Takatomi, 2023. "Price Markups and Wage Setting Behavior of Japanese Firms," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 23-E-5, Bank of Japan.
    11. Axel Demenet & Quynh Hoang, 2018. "How important are management practices for the productivity of small and medium enterprises?," WIDER Working Paper Series 69, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Yoshitsugu Kanemoto, 2013. "Pitfalls in estimating “wider economic benefits” of transportation projects," GRIPS Discussion Papers 13-20, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    13. Chen Yeh & Claudia Macaluso & Brad Hershbein, 2022. "Monopsony in the US Labor Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(7), pages 2099-2138, July.
    14. Kong, Dongmin & Kong, Gaowen & Liu, Shasha & Zhu, Ling, 2022. "Does competition cause government decentralization? The case of state-owned enterprises," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 1103-1122.
    15. Sungki Hong, 2019. "Customer Capital, Markup Cyclicality, and Amplification," 2019 Meeting Papers 959, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    16. Bas, Maria & Paunov, Caroline, 2025. "Riders on the storm: How do firms navigate production and market conditions amid El Niño?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    17. Muhammad Ansar Majeed & Irfan Ullah & Samia Tariq & Tanveer Ahsan, 2025. "Does brand capital improve stock liquidity? Evidence from China," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 382-404, January.
    18. Atawnah, Nader & Zaman, Rashid & Liu, Jia & Atawna, Thaer & Maghyereh, Aktham, 2023. "Does foreign competition affect corporate debt maturity structure? Evidence from import penetration," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    19. Alvaro Garcia Marin & Nico Voigtländer, 2018. "Product-Level Efficiency and Core Competence in Multi-Product Plants," 2018 Meeting Papers 737, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    20. Mary Amiti & Oleg Itskhoki & Jozef Konings, 2016. "International Shocks and Domestic Prices: How Large Are Strategic Complementarities?," NBER Working Papers 22119, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3817-:d:1640914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.