IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3800-d1640551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Regional Food Futures in Peri-Urban Austria—Participatory Generation of Scenarios and Policy Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Niklas Gudowsky-Blatakes

    (Institute of Technology Assessment, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Bäckerstr. 13, 1010 Vienna, Austria)

  • Mahshid Sotoudeh

    (Institute of Technology Assessment, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Bäckerstr. 13, 1010 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

Current food systems provide relative food security but compromise planetary health and largely fail to address climate change challenges. Regional food supplies can contribute to sustainable production and consumption, reducing the dependence on global supply chains. However, food systems’ complexity and rigidity hinder the implementation of climate-conscious, healthier practices. The City.Food.Basket project explored regional food baskets in urban and peri-urban settings in Austria for the City of Graz and its surroundings, developing models for regional, healthy, and low-climate-impact diets. Against this background, we present a qualitative study that generated three explorative scenarios for promoting regional diets using a Delphi-based expert-stakeholder survey method with participatory elements. A scenario workshop elaborated on interconnecting actions to strengthen regional food supply, including making regional food a tender criterion, reducing waste, ensuring affordability, and shifting subsidies to climate-conscious practices for Graz. While the method successfully provides socio-technical futures for policy orientation, its direct policy impact remains low due to time constraints, short project duration, limited project resources, and differing rationalities between research and policymaking. This study highlights the need for improved connectivity between transdisciplinary research, foresight methods, and regional policy cycles to enhance such projects’ effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Niklas Gudowsky-Blatakes & Mahshid Sotoudeh, 2025. "Exploring Regional Food Futures in Peri-Urban Austria—Participatory Generation of Scenarios and Policy Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3800-:d:1640551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3800/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3800/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schirrmeister, Elna & Warnke, Philine, 2013. "Envisioning structural transformation — lessons from a foresight project on the future of innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 453-466.
    2. Michael Rapinski & Richard Raymond & Damien Davy & Thora Herrmann & Jean-Philippe Bedell & Abdou Ka & Guillaume Odonne & Laine Chanteloup & Pascal Jean Lopez & Éric Foulquier & Eduardo Ferreira da Sil, 2023. "Local Food Systems under Global Influence: The Case of Food, Health and Environment in Five Socio-Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Hamid El Bilali & Tarek Ben Hassen, 2024. "Disrupted harvests: how Ukraine – Russia war influences global food systems – a systematic review," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3-4), pages 310-335, May.
    4. Bowman, Gary & MacKay, R. Bradley & Masrani, Swapnesh & McKiernan, Peter, 2013. "Storytelling and the scenario process: Understanding success and failure," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(4), pages 735-748.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomas Gabriel Bas, 2025. "Globalization vs. Glocalization: Learn Lessons from Two Global Crises, Such as the Russia–Ukraine Conflict and the COVID-19 Pandemic, for the Agro-Food and Agro-Industrial Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-47, January.
    2. Burt, George & Mackay, David J. & van der Heijden, Kees & Verheijdt, Charlotte, 2017. "Openness disposition: Readiness characteristics that influence participant benefits from scenario planning as strategic conversation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 16-25.
    3. Cairns, George & Wright, George & Fairbrother, Peter, 2016. "Promoting articulated action from diverse stakeholders in response to public policy scenarios: A case analysis of the use of ‘scenario improvisation’ method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 97-108.
    4. Cairns, George & Wright, George & Fairbrother, Peter & Phillips, Richard, 2017. "‘Branching scenarios’ seeking articulated action for regional regeneration – A case study of limited success," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 189-202.
    5. Wright, George & Cairns, George & O'Brien, Frances A. & Goodwin, Paul, 2019. "Scenario analysis to support decision making in addressing wicked problems: Pitfalls and potential," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 3-19.
    6. Robinson, Douglas K.R. & Schoen, Antoine & Larédo, Philippe & Gallart, Jordi Molas & Warnke, Philine & Kuhlmann, Stefan & Ordóñez-Matamoros, Gonzalo, 2021. "Policy lensing of future-oriented strategic intelligence: An experiment connecting foresight with decision making contexts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Metz, Ashley & Hartley, Paul, 2020. "Scenario development as valuation: Opportunities for reflexivity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Ram, Camelia, 2020. "Scenario presentation and scenario generation in multi-criteria assessments: An exploratory study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Gary Bowman, 2022. "A timely (and timeless) blend of theory and practice: A commentary on Rowland and Spaniol (2021)," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), March.
    10. Ramboarison-Lalao, Lovanirina & Gannouni, Kais, 2019. "Liberated firm, a leverage of well-being and technological change? A prospective study based on the scenario method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 129-139.
    11. Frith, David & Tapinos, Efstathios, 2020. "Opening the ‘black box’ of scenario planning through realist synthesis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    12. M. Lynne Markus & Kevin Mentzer, 2014. "Foresight for a responsible future with ICT," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 353-368, July.
    13. Bowman, Gary & Parks, Ryan W., 2024. "Between episodes of strategy: Sociomateriality, sensemaking, and dysfunction in a scenario planning process," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Warnke, Philine & Schirrmeister, Elna, 2018. "Transition-scenarios towards socially sustainable global value chains: Insights from the SONA WSK Foresight," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S10/2018, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    15. Douglas K. R. Robinson & Antoine Schoen & Philippe Larédo & Jordi Molas Gallart & Philine Warnke & Stefan Kuhlmann & Gonzalo Ordóñez-Matamoros, 2021. "Policy lensing of future-oriented strategic intelligence: An experiment connecting foresight with decision making contexts," Post-Print hal-03232913, HAL.
    16. Christopher Münch & Heiko A. von der Gracht, 2021. "A bibliometric review of scientific theory in futures and foresight: A commentary on Fergnani and Chermack 2021," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(3-4), September.
    17. Aleksandra Badora & Krzysztof Kud, 2024. "Innovative Production and Innovative Agricultural Products in the Food Economy in the Context of Selected Lifestyle Elements of the Inhabitants of South-Eastern Poland: Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-29, November.
    18. Cagnin, Cristiano & Havas, Attila & Saritas, Ozcan, 2013. "Future-oriented technology analysis: Its potential to address disruptive transformations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 379-385.
    19. Dönitz, Ewa & Breitschopf, Barbara & Burghard, Uta, 2023. "Scenarios of a desirable and fair energy transition," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S03/2023, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    20. Ernst, Anna & Biß, Klaus H. & Shamon, Hawal & Schumann, Diana & Heinrichs, Heidi U., 2018. "Benefits and challenges of participatory methods in qualitative energy scenario development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 245-257.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3800-:d:1640551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.