IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3329-d1630743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soundscape Research in Streets: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Zeynep Sena Ozturk

    (UCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett, University College London (UCL), Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London WC1H 0NN, UK)

  • Jian Kang

    (UCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett, University College London (UCL), Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London WC1H 0NN, UK)

  • Francesco Aletta

    (UCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett, University College London (UCL), Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London WC1H 0NN, UK)

Abstract

Streets play a crucial role in shaping urban soundscapes, influencing individual wellbeing and urban sustainability. Although urban soundscapes have been widely studied, research focusing on street soundscapes remains limited. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the main themes and methodologies used in recent street soundscape literature. Scopus and ScienceDirect databases were searched for journal articles and conference papers with the keywords “street and sound”. The review included articles published in English between 2000 and 2025. The selected studies focused on soundscapes in outdoor environments while offering insights into streetscape features. Articles that did not focus on perception of the street environment or report a sample size were excluded, resulting in 16 studies in the final review. Soundscapes were mostly examined in terms of noise annoyance ( n = 6) and sound perception ( n = 14), distinguishing between pleasant and unpleasant sounds. Natural elements are frequently identified as essential streetscape ( n = 8) and soundscape components of streets ( n = 3). These features are associated with positive perceptions, whereas traffic features are perceived negatively. The predominant methodological approach was laboratory studies ( n = 10), with participant groups typically consisting of healthy adults. Sample sizes ranged from 10 to 1200. Overall, the literature points to a significant gap in research on the effect of street soundscapes on wellbeing, revealing that numerous streetscape characteristics remain unexplored and the link between soundscapes and street features has not been thoroughly examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeynep Sena Ozturk & Jian Kang & Francesco Aletta, 2025. "Soundscape Research in Streets: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3329-:d:1630743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3329/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3329/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mercede Erfanian & Andrew J. Mitchell & Jian Kang & Francesco Aletta, 2019. "The Psychophysiological Implications of Soundscape: A Systematic Review of Empirical Literature and a Research Agenda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Aletta & Jian Kang, 2019. "Promoting Healthy and Supportive Acoustic Environments: Going beyond the Quietness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-4, December.
    2. Baoqing Song & Chenyu Gong & Yicheng Gao & Yue Ke & Zehua Wang & Ruichong Lin & Yunji Cai, 2022. "Music Literacy and Soundscape Perception: A Study Based on the Soundwalk Method of Soundscapes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Lars Even Egner & Stefan Sütterlin & Giovanna Calogiuri, 2020. "Proposing a Framework for the Restorative Effects of Nature through Conditioning: Conditioned Restoration Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Aggelos Tsaligopoulos & Stella Kyvelou & Nefta-Eleftheria Votsi & Aimilia Karapostoli & Chris Economou & Yiannis G. Matsinos, 2021. "Revisiting the Concept of Quietness in the Urban Environment—Towards Ecosystems’ Health and Human Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Feng Li & Jiali Xiang & Tao Li & Danni Shen & Tian Li, 2022. "Active Indoor Soundscape Design: A Case Study of Ceramic Passive Amplifiers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Sigbjørn Litleskare & Tadhg E. MacIntyre & Giovanna Calogiuri, 2020. "Enable, Reconnect and Augment: A New ERA of Virtual Nature Research and Application," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Jiaxu Zhou & Xiaohu Jia & Guoqiang Xu & Junhan Jia & Rihan Hai & Chongsen Gao & Shuo Zhang, 2019. "The Relationship between Different Types of Alarm Sounds and Children’s Perceived Risk Based on Their Physiological Responses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Tallal Abdel Karim Bouzir & Djihed Berkouk & Juan Miguel Barrigón Morillas & Guillermo Rey-Gozalo & David Montes González, 2024. "Noise Pollution Studies in the Arab World: A Scientometric Analysis and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Hyun In Jo & Jin Yong Jeon, 2024. "Quantification of Visual Attention by Using Eye-Tracking Technology for Soundscape Assessment Through Physiological Response," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(11), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Tong-Yu Li & Si-Yuan Guo & Bin-Xia Xue & Qi Meng & Bo Jiang & Xin-Xin Xu & Chein-Chi Chang, 2022. "Effects of Soundscape on Flow State during Diabolo Exercise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Lawal M. Marafa & Zhe Wang & Felix K. H. Tsang, 2022. "Tranquillity in Urban Classical Chinese Gardens and Modern Parks: The Effect of Natural and Contextual Features," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Joo-Young Hong & Keng Hua Chong, 2023. "Designing Public Soundscapes through Social Architecture and Soundscape Approaches: Reflective Review of Architectural Design Studio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3329-:d:1630743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.