IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p389-d1015717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review of the Development of Sport Policy Research (2000–2020)

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Ouyang

    (Department of Physical Education, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung City 403514, Taiwan)

  • Ping-Chao Lee

    (Department of Physical Education, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung City 403514, Taiwan)

  • Ling-Mei Ko

    (Department of Leisure, Recreation and Tourism Management, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan City 710301, Taiwan)

Abstract

Since the 1990s, sport policy research has gradually attracted increasing academic attention as a reflection of contemporary society at a particular time. This study adopted four types of theory proposed by Houlihan (2014) to analyze the research development of sport policy. It conducted a systematic review and yielded 100 policy articles related to elite sports, physical education, and sport for all. The scope of the research data was identified from 2000 to 2020 with collation from 24 international Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) journals, which specialized in policy and sport–related studies of social science to look forward to a comprehensive report. The four major findings were as follows: first, this study pointed to evidence that nearly half the research on the topic aimed at meso–level analyses of organizations; second, it demonstrated governance theory, the Sports Policy Factors Leading to International Sporting Success (SPLISS) model, the advocacy coalition Framework (ACF), and network-related theories played a pivotal role in focusing on policy backgrounds and dynamic relationships within organizations; third, it identified some studies highlighted in the policy texts themselves, or discourse about them, and, thereby, were grouped into the fifth type; finally, the paper suggested that attention has been brought to policy formation and implementation rather than policy evaluation, which has made a contribution to the development of their own operating mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Ouyang & Ping-Chao Lee & Ling-Mei Ko, 2022. "A Systematic Review of the Development of Sport Policy Research (2000–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:389-:d:1015717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ørnulf Seippel & Eivind Å. Skille, 2015. "Sport Clubs in Norway," Sports Economics, Management, and Policy, in: Christoph Breuer & Remco Hoekman & Siegfried Nagel & Harold van der Werff (ed.), Sport Clubs in Europe, chapter 0, pages 309-324, Springer.
    2. Alessandro Liberati & Douglas G Altman & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Cynthia Mulrow & Peter C Gøtzsche & John P A Ioannidis & Mike Clarke & P J Devereaux & Jos Kleijnen & David Moher, 2009. "The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Bastien Viollet & Nicolas Scelles & Alain Ferrand, 2020. "The engagement of actors during the formulation of a national federation sport policy: an analysis within the French Rugby Union," Post-Print hal-02505278, HAL.
    4. Mick Green & Shane Collins, 2008. "Policy, Politics and Path Dependency: Sport Development in Australia and Finland," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 225-251, September.
    5. Green, Mick & Collins, Shane, 2008. "Policy, Politics and Path Dependency: Sport Development in Australia and Finland," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 225-251, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bastien Viollet & Nicolas Scelles & Qi Peng, 2023. "From Sport Policy to National Federation Sport Policy: An Integrative Literature Review and Conceptualisation Attempt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Kuang-Hua Hu & Fu-Hsiang Chen & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2016. "Evaluating the Improvement of Sustainability of Sports Industry Policy Based on MADM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Jairo León-Quismondo & José Bonal & Pablo Burillo & Álvaro Fernández-Luna, 2023. "How Can We Improve Running Events? The IPA4RE Questionnaire and Its Potential Impact on the Experience of Runners," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Dawson, Andrew & Phillips, Pamm, 2013. "Coach career development: Who is responsible?," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 477-487.
    5. Sotiriadou, Kalliopi (Popi) & Shilbury, David, 2009. "Australian Elite Athlete Development: An Organisational Perspective," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 137-148, August.
    6. Sisitha Jayasinghe & Emily J. Flies & Robert Soward & Dave Kendal & Michelle Kilpatrick & Verity Cleland & Rebecca Roberts & Fadhillah Norzahari & Melanie Davern & Timothy P. Holloway & Sandra Murray , 2022. "Physical Activity and Food Environments in and around Schools: A Case Study in Regional North-West Tasmania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Thomson, Alana & Darcy, Simon & Pearce, Sonya, 2010. "Ganma theory and third-sector sport-development programmes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth: Implications for sports management," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 313-330, November.
    8. Dowling, Mathew & Brown, Phil & Legg, David & Beacom, Aaron, 2018. "Living with imperfect comparisons: The challenges and limitations of comparative paralympic sport policy research," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 101-113.
    9. Bastien Viollet & Nicolas Scelles & Qi Peng, 2023. "From Sport Policy to National Federation Sport Policy: An Integrative Literature Review and Conceptualisation Attempt," Post-Print hal-03991847, HAL.
    10. Pedras, Loïc & Taylor, Tracy & Frawley, Stephen, 2020. "Responses to multi-level institutional complexity in a national sport federation," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 482-497.
    11. Jaume García & Fernando Lera-López & María José Suárez, 2011. "Estimation of a Structural Model of the Determinants of the Time Spent on Physical Activity and Sport," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 12(5), pages 515-537, October.
    12. Dalton, Bronwen & Wilson, Rachel & Evans, John Robert & Cochrane, Steve, 2015. "Australian Indigenous youth's participation in sport and associated health outcomes: Empirical analysis and implications," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 57-68.
    13. Downward, Paul & Lera-Lopez, Fernando & Rasciute, Simona, 2011. "The Zero-Inflated ordered probit approach to modelling sports participation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 2469-2477.
    14. Phillips, Pamm & Newland, Brianna, 2014. "Emergent models of sport development and delivery: The case of triathlon in Australia and the US," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 107-120.
    15. Miklós Kozma & Krisztina András, 2014. "Winning in Europe: International Strategies for Hungarian Professional Sports Clubs," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 2(4), pages 31-49.
    16. Mutter, Felix & Pawlowski, Tim, 2014. "Role models in sports – Can success in professional sports increase the demand for amateur sport participation?," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 324-336.
    17. Elizabeth T Cafiero-Fonseca & Andrew Stawasz & Sydney T Johnson & Reiko Sato & David E Bloom, 2017. "The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    18. Ludoviko Zirimenya & Fatima Mahmud-Ajeigbe & Ruth McQuillan & You Li, 2020. "A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between urogenital schistosomiasis and HIV/AIDS infection," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Trang Nguyen & Sara Holton & Thach Tran & Jane Fisher, 2019. "Informal mental health interventions for people with severe mental illness in low and lower middle-income countries: A systematic review of effectiveness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 65(3), pages 194-206, May.
    20. Natalya Ivanova & Ekaterina Zolotova, 2023. "Landolt Indicator Values in Modern Research: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:389-:d:1015717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.