IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3293-d1630166.html

Quality Models for Preventing the Impact of Supply Chain Disruptions in Future Crises

Author

Listed:
  • Miroslav Drljača

    (Department of Sustainable Mobility and Logistic, University North, Koprivnica, Croatia & Croatian Quality Managers Society, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
    IAQ Administrative Office, 2975 Valmont Road, Suite 240, Boulder, CO 80301, USA)

  • Saša Petar

    (Department of Sustainable Mobility and Logistic, University North, Trg dr. Žarka Dolinara 1, 48000 Koprivnica, Croatia)

  • Grace D. Brannan

    (Graduate Medical Education, McLaren Health Care—Macomb Hospital, Mount Clemens, MI 48043, USA
    GDB Research and Statistical Consulting, Athens, OH 45701, USA)

  • Igor Štimac

    (Airport Operations and Development Supervision Department and Consulting, Zagreb Airport Ltd., Rudolfa Fizira 1, 10410 Velika Gorica, Croatia
    Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, Department of Air Transport, University of Zagreb, Vukelićeva 4, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Supply chains, which have numerous participants, are exposed and vulnerable. In recent years, this has been evident in disruptions caused by circumstances that have changed the context, such as (1) the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) the Suez Canal blockade, and (3) the war in Ukraine. These circumstances caused disruptions in supply chains and surprised numerous participants in the international market, individual organizations, as well as states and entities around the world. This caused confusion and large financial losses for numerous global market participants and for people all around the world. The purpose of this paper is to design three original models, the implementation of which should significantly reduce the damage caused by disruptions in supply chains in future crises: (1) a model for individual organizations, (2) a national economy model, and (3) a global model. The authors applied methods of scientific cognition and analyzed three case studies from the recent past. The key finding is that by applying the models with four components (methods, measures, quality tools, and indicators), the resilience of supply chains increases the damage from disruptions in supply chains during future crises can be significantly reduced, and the quality of life of everyone on the planet will be less threatened.

Suggested Citation

  • Miroslav Drljača & Saša Petar & Grace D. Brannan & Igor Štimac, 2025. "Quality Models for Preventing the Impact of Supply Chain Disruptions in Future Crises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-29, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3293-:d:1630166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3293/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3293/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gritz, Alexandra & Wolff, Guntram, 2024. "Gas and energy security in Germany and central and Eastern Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Gaétan Rassenfosse & Tetiana Murovana & Wolf-Hendrik Uhlbach, 2023. "The effects of war on Ukrainian research," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Katarzyna Grzybowska & Agnieszka Stachowiak, 2022. "Global Changes and Disruptions in Supply Chains—Preliminary Research to Sustainable Resilience of Supply Chains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Devadoss, Stephen & Ridley, William, 2024. "Impacts of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on the global wheat market," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Jason Bram & James A. Orr & Carol Rapaport, 2002. "Measuring the effects of the September 11 attack on New York City," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 8(Nov), pages 5-20.
    6. Wilson, Martha C., 2007. "The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 295-320, July.
    7. Desire Aime Nshimirimana & Donald Kokonya & Jesse Gitaka & Bernard Wesonga & Japheth Nzioki Mativo & Jean Marie Vianey Rukanikigitero, 2023. "Impact of COVID-19 on health-related quality of life in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Clodia Vurro & Angeloantonio Russo & Francesco Perrini, 2009. "Shaping Sustainable Value Chains: Network Determinants of Supply Chain Governance Models," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(4), pages 607-621, December.
    9. Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2021. "Identification and Classification of Global Theoretical Trends and Supply Chain Development Directions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Karim Gazzeh & Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & Emad Hammad, 2022. "Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Global Flows of People and Goods: Implications on the Dynamics of Urban Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Kim, Dongin & Steinbach, Sandro & Zurita, Carlos, 2024. "Deep trade agreements and agri-food global value chain integration," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    12. McKibbin, Warwick & Fernando, Roshen, 2023. "The global economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Grzybowska & Agnieszka Stachowiak, 2022. "Global Changes and Disruptions in Supply Chains—Preliminary Research to Sustainable Resilience of Supply Chains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Agrell, Per J. & Dehaybe, Henri & Rodriguez, Manuel Herrera, 2025. "Balancing supply security and decarbonization: Optimizing Germany’s LNG port infrastructure under the European Green Deal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. J. David Cummins & Michael Suher & George Zanjani, 1975. "Federal Financial Exposure to Natural Catastrophe Risk," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring and Managing Federal Financial Risk, pages 61-92, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Kei Hosoya, 2025. "Slow consumption recovery after the pandemic: perspective from a time preference approach," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 72(1), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Zhou, Meng & Yang, Yanlong & Xiang, Shuwen, 2025. "Effect of community learning mechanism on cooperation in conflict societies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Tung Nguyen & Dimitris Petmezas & Nikolaos Karampatsas, 2023. "Does Terrorism Affect Acquisitions?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 4134-4168, July.
    7. Jihee Han & KwangSup Shin, 2016. "Evaluation mechanism for structural robustness of supply chain considering disruption propagation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 135-151, January.
    8. Papanagnou, Christos & Seiler, Andreas & Spanaki, Konstantina & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Bourlakis, Michael, 2022. "Data-driven digital transformation for emergency situations: The case of the UK retail sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    9. repec:pcz:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:33-44 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Fu Jia & Yan Jiang, 2018. "Sustainable Global Sourcing: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, February.
    11. Lixin Shen & Kannan Govindan & Atul B. Borade & Ali Diabat & Devika Kannan, 2013. "An evaluation of vendor managed inventory practices from small and medium indian enterprises," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(sup1), pages 76-95, June.
    12. Marco Percoco, 2006. "A Note on the Inoperability Input‐Output Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 589-594, June.
    13. Víctor Hugo de la Cruz Madrigal & Liliana Avelar Sosa & Jose-Manuel Mejía-Muñoz & Jorge Luis García Alcaraz & Emilio Jiménez Macías, 2025. "Dynamical System Modeling for Disruption in Supply Chain and Its Detection Using a Data-Driven Deep Learning-Based Architecture," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-23, April.
    14. Natalia Tsybuliak & Uliana Kolomiiets & Anastasiia Popova & Hanna Lopatina & Yuriy Petrushenko & Yana Suchikova, 2025. "Progressive intensification of burnout among academic staff during the war," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. M. Ángeles Sanfiel-Fumero & Yaiza Armas-Cruz & Olga González-Morales, 2017. "Sustainability of the tourist supply chain and governance in an insular biosphere reserve destination: the perspective of tourist accommodation," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7), pages 1256-1274, July.
    16. Md Maruf Hossan Chowdhury & Mohammad Tarikul Islam & Imran Ali & Mohammed Quaddus, 2024. "The role of social capital, resilience, and network complexity in attaining supply chain sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2621-2639, March.
    17. Yi Tao & Loo Hay Lee & Ek Peng Chew, 2016. "Quantifying the Effect of Sharing Information in a Supply Chain Facing Supply Disruptions," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(04), pages 1-28, August.
    18. Francesco Perrini & Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati & Clodia Vurro, 2011. "Deconstructing the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 59-76, March.
    19. Rana Azghandi & Jacqueline Griffin & Mohammad S. Jalali, 2018. "Minimization of Drug Shortages in Pharmaceutical Supply Chains: A Simulation-Based Analysis of Drug Recall Patterns and Inventory Policies," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-14, December.
    20. Jason Bram & Andrew Haughwout & James Orr, 2004. "Has September 11 Affected New York City’s Growth Potential?," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Yasuhide Okuyama & Stephanie E. Chang (ed.), Modeling Spatial and Economic Impacts of Disasters, chapter 4, pages 53-73, Springer.
    21. Saeedeh Anvari & Metin Turkay, 2017. "The facility location problem from the perspective of triple bottom line accounting of sustainability," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(21), pages 6266-6287, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3293-:d:1630166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.