IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3275-d1629690.html

Differences in Port Pricing Strategies: Case of Port and Fairway Fees in Northern Baltic Sea Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Tõnis Hunt

    (Estonian Maritime Academy, Tallinn University of Technology, Kopli 101, 11712 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Ulla Tapaninen

    (Estonian Maritime Academy, Tallinn University of Technology, Kopli 101, 11712 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Jonne Kotta

    (Estonian Maritime Academy, Tallinn University of Technology, Kopli 101, 11712 Tallinn, Estonia
    Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Mäealuse 14, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia)

Abstract

Ports and waterways are integral components of the maritime transport system, facilitating global trade and logistics. Governments, ports, and service providers levy charges on vessels for the use of fairways, port access, and associated services. This study analyzes the port and fairway fee strategies of seven major Baltic Sea ports across four countries: Estonia (Tallinn and Sillamäe), Latvia (Riga and Ventspils), Finland (Helsinki and HaminaKotka), and Sweden (Stockholm). The analysis evaluates the application of general port pricing principles in these ports’ strategies. The findings reveal that port fees are predominantly value-based, with tariff rates varying by vessel type and cargo. However, no uniform structure exists for fairway fees. Notably, incorporating environmental components into fairway fee calculations emerges as a promising mechanism to promote sustainability in maritime transport. By incentivizing the adoption of environmentally friendly vessels through differentiated fee structures, ports and policymakers can accelerate the transition toward greener shipping practices. This study highlights the role of economic instruments in advancing environmental objectives and emphasizes the need for a harmonized, sustainability-driven approach to fairway and port pricing in the Baltic Sea region.

Suggested Citation

  • Tõnis Hunt & Ulla Tapaninen & Jonne Kotta, 2025. "Differences in Port Pricing Strategies: Case of Port and Fairway Fees in Northern Baltic Sea Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3275-:d:1629690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulla Tapaninen & Riina Palu, 2022. "Recovery of ro-pax ferry traffic from covid-19 under tightening environmental regulations: case Helsinki-Tallinn," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Talley, Wayne K. & Ng, ManWo, 2013. "Maritime transport chain choice by carriers, ports and shippers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 311-316.
    3. MEERSMAN, Hilde & STRANDENES, Siri Pettersen & VAN DE VOORDE, Eddy, 2014. "Port pricing: Principles, structure and models," Working Papers 2014006, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    4. Alexandre Lavissiere, 2018. "Vessel Port Dues: An Influence from Path Dependency rather than Geography of Ports," Post-Print hal-01954461, HAL.
    5. Merkel, Axel & Lindgren, Samuel, 2022. "Effects of fairway dues on the deployment and utilization of vessels: Lessons from a regression discontinuity design," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 204-214.
    6. Merkel, Axel & Lindgren, Samuel, 2022. "Effects of fairway dues on the deployment and utilization of vessels: Lessons from a regression discontinuity design," Working Papers 2022:3, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mari-Liis Tombak & Deniece Melissa Aiken & Eliise Toomeoja & Ulla Pirita Tapaninen, 2025. "Advancing Port Sustainability in the Baltic Sea Region: A Comparative Analysis Using the SMCC Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinli Qi & Zhenfu Li & Yiran Zhang & Qiqi Zhang & Chunrui Song, 2025. "Evolutionary game analysis of Arctic shipping black carbon emission reduction strategies based on government regulation and port fee differential policies," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Nagurney, Anna & Saberi, Sara & Shukla, Shivani & Floden, Jonas, 2015. "Supply chain network competition in price and quality with multiple manufacturers and freight service providers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 248-267.
    3. Quartieri, Federico, 2017. "Are vessel sharing agreements pro-competitive?," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 11, pages 33-48.
    4. Talley, Wayne K., 2014. "Maritime transport chains: carrier, port and shipper choice effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 174-179.
    5. Flitsch, Verena & Brümmerstedt, Katrin, 2015. "Freight Transport Modelling of Container Hinterland Supply Chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 233-266, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    6. Fahim, Patrick B.M. & Rezaei, Jafar & Montreuil, Benoit & Tavasszy, Lorant, 2022. "Port performance evaluation and selection in the Physical Internet," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 83-94.
    7. Talley, Wayne K. & Ng, ManWo, 2017. "Hinterland transport chains: Determinant effects on chain choice," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 175-179.
    8. Li, Diansheng & Qu, Yuanyuan & Ma, Yanhong, 2020. "Study on the impact of subsidies for overlapping hinterland shippers on port competition," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 24-37.
    9. Tran, Nguyen Khoi & Haralambides, Hercules & Notteboom, Theo & Cullinane, Kevin, 2025. "The costs of maritime supply chain disruptions: The case of the Suez Canal blockage by the ‘Ever Given’ megaship," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    10. Xiao, Yi & Wang, Grace & Ge, Ying-En & Xu, Qinyi & Li, Kevin X., 2021. "Game model for a new inspection regime of port state control under different reward and punishment conditions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Hong-Oanh Nguyen & Anthony Chin & Jose Tongzon & Mahinda Bandara, 2016. "Analysis of strategic pricing in the port sector: The network approach," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 18(3), pages 264-281, September.
    12. Yang, Yi-Chih & Chen, Shu-Ling, 2016. "Determinants of global logistics hub ports: Comparison of the port development policies of Taiwan, Korea, and Japan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 179-189.
    13. Guerrero, David & Thill, Jean-Claude, 2021. "Challenging the shipper's location problem in port studies: An analysis of French AOC wine shipments to the US," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Cheng, Jiannan & Lian, Feng & Yang, Zhongzhen, 2022. "The impacts of port governance reform on port competition in China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    15. Massimo Geloso Grosso & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Asako Ueno & Frédéric Gonzales & Iza Lejárraga & Sébastien Miroudot & Dorothée Rouzet, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Transport and Courier Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 176, OECD Publishing.
    16. Feo-Valero, María & Martínez-Moya, Julián, 2022. "Shippers vs. freight forwarders: Do they differ in their port choice decisions? Evidence from the Spanish ceramic tile industry," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Nestor Goicoechea & Luis María Abadie, 2021. "Optimal Slow Steaming Speed for Container Ships under the EU Emission Trading System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    18. Zhen, Lu & Shen, Tao & Wang, Shuaian & Yu, Shucheng, 2016. "Models on ship scheduling in transshipment hubs with considering bunker cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 111-121.
    19. Nicole Adler & Georg Hirte & Shravana Kumar & Hans-Martin Niemeier, 2022. "The impact of specialization, ownership, competition and regulation on efficiency: a case study of Indian seaports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 507-536, September.
    20. Chen, Enhui & Liu, Yang & Yang, Min & Ye, Zhirui & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2024. "The sustainability appeal of urban rail transit," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3275-:d:1629690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.