IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2766-d1616597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strengthening the Sustainability of Energy Critical Entities Through a Business Continuity Management System

Author

Listed:
  • David Rehak

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 70030 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Martin Hromada

    (Faculty of Applied Informatics, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, 76005 Zlin, Czech Republic)

  • Simona Jemelkova

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 70030 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Lenka Brumarova

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 70030 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Ivo Haring

    (Fraunhofer Institute for High-Speed Dynamics, Ernst-Mach-Institut, EMI, 79104 Freiburg, Germany)

Abstract

Energy supply is currently considered a key area that is essential for the functioning of the entire society, remaining one of the most fundamental sectors of critical infrastructure worldwide. However, the functionality of energy systems is threatened by a number of threats from various areas, such as natural influences, technological threats, terrorism, and even state-supported organized attacks. For this reason, there is an active effort by all interested parties to achieve a sufficient resilience and sustainability level of these systems. Currently, various tools are used for this purpose, the essence of which is to ensure the preparedness of energy systems. Primarily, basic dependable systems aspects are applied according to the planning documentation and according to the N-1 principle from the transmission system code. These tools are functional and very proven in practice. However, the sprawling threat landscape and the COVID-19 pandemic have shown that the use of individual, separate tools may not comprehensively cover the entire area of preparedness, especially for unexpected events or expected events of unexpected dimensions. To address this challenge, the article takes up the professional abstract recommendation of ensuring the preparedness of the entire system comprehensively, i.e., by involving all possible tools, knowledge, and resources that the critical entity has. It proposes and tailors a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS) for the energy domain. The approach covers the entire management system of the organization, in which it establishes, implements, operates, monitors, reviews, maintains, and improves the continuity of activities in terms of key energy system functions. The aim is to ensure the sustainability of the functionality of the given systems within acceptable ranges. The article presents the targeted BCMS targets, building blocks, and representative implementation methods and tools. It is argued that the proposal is ready for application in the specific area of energy critical entities and systems by providing examples of partial implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • David Rehak & Martin Hromada & Simona Jemelkova & Lenka Brumarova & Ivo Haring, 2025. "Strengthening the Sustainability of Energy Critical Entities Through a Business Continuity Management System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2766-:d:1616597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2766/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2766/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed Elkhatat & Shaheen Al-Muhtaseb, 2024. "Climate Change and Energy Security: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Energy Policies in Advancing Environmental Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-31, June.
    2. Julia Eichholz & Nicole Hoffmann & Anja Schwering, 2024. "The role of risk management orientation and the planning function of budgeting in enhancing organizational resilience and its effect on competitive advantages during times of crises," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 17-58, March.
    3. Lazar Gitelman & Mikhail Kozhevnikov, 2023. "New Business Models in the Energy Sector in the Context of Revolutionary Transformations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Torabi, S.A. & Mansouri, S.A., 2015. "Integrated business continuity and disaster recovery planning: Towards organizational resilienceAuthor-Name: Sahebjamnia, N," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 261-273.
    5. Rafael Ninno Muniz & Carlos Tavares da Costa Júnior & William Gouvêa Buratto & Ademir Nied & Gabriel Villarrubia González, 2023. "The Sustainability Concept: A Review Focusing on Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Marja Ylönen & Terje Aven, 2023. "A framework for understanding risk based on the concepts of ontology and epistemology," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 581-593, June.
    7. Hall, Stephen & Roelich, Katy, 2016. "Business model innovation in electricity supply markets: The role of complex value in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 286-298.
    8. Mohamed Wael Ben Khaled & Nadia Ouertani Abaoub, 2024. "Energy Sector Evolution: Perspectives on Energy Platforms and Energy Transition," Post-Print hal-04612503, HAL.
    9. Stanley Kaplan & B. John Garrick, 1981. "On The Quantitative Definition of Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 11-27, March.
    10. Iwona Gorzeń-Mitka & Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala, 2023. "Mapping the Energy Sector from a Risk Management Research Perspective: A Bibliometric and Scientific Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-32, February.
    11. Carracedo, Patricia & Puertas, Rosa & Marti, Luisa, 2021. "Research lines on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on business. A text mining analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 586-593.
    12. Bockius, Heike & Gatzert, Nadine, 2024. "Organizational risk culture: A literature review on dimensions, assessment, value relevance, and improvement levers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 539-564.
    13. Marten Ovaere and Stef Proost, 2018. "Optimal Electricity Transmission Reliability: Going Beyond the N-1 Criterion," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    2. Ningshan Hao & Voicu D. Dragomir, 2025. "Renewable Energy, Sustainable Business Models, and Decarbonization in the European Union: Comparative Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Joanna Staszewska & Lilla Knop, 2025. "Identifying Resilience Factors of Power Company Business Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-35, February.
    4. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    5. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    6. Mehdi Hajilo & Mojtaba Ghadiri Masoom & Seyed Hassan Motiee Langroudi & Hassanali Faraji Sabokbar & Lori Pennington-Gray, 2017. "Spatial Analysis of the Distribution of Small Businesses in the Eastern Villages of Gilan Province with Emphasis on the Tourism Sector in Mountainous Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Ozgur Satici & Esra Satici, 2024. "Theoretical semi-quantitative risk assessment methodology for tunnel design and construction processes," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(7), pages 3385-3405, July.
    8. Chen, Fuzhong & Hsu, Chien-Lung & Lin, Arthur J. & Li, Haifeng, 2020. "Holding risky financial assets and subjective wellbeing: Empirical evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    9. Niël Almero Krüger & Natanya Meyer, 2021. "The Development of a Small and Medium-Sized Business Risk Management Intervention Tool," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Johnson, Caroline A. & Flage, Roger & Guikema, Seth D., 2021. "Feasibility study of PRA for critical infrastructure risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    11. Kasai, Naoya & Matsuhashi, Shigemi & Sekine, Kazuyoshi, 2013. "Accident occurrence model for the risk analysis of industrialfacilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 71-74.
    12. J. C. Helton & F. J. Davis, 2002. "Illustration of Sampling‐Based Methods for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 591-622, June.
    13. Michael Greenberg & Paul Lioy & Birnur Ozbas & Nancy Mantell & Sastry Isukapalli & Michael Lahr & Tayfur Altiok & Joseph Bober & Clifton Lacy & Karen Lowrie & Henry Mayer & Jennifer Rovito, 2013. "Passenger Rail Security, Planning, and Resilience: Application of Network, Plume, and Economic Simulation Models as Decision Support Tools," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(11), pages 1969-1986, November.
    14. Chia-Lee Yang & Benjamin J. C. Yuan & Chi-Yo Huang, 2015. "Key Determinant Derivations for Information Technology Disaster Recovery Site Selection by the Multi-Criterion Decision Making Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-40, May.
    15. Felipe Aguirre & Mohamed Sallak & Walter Schön & Fabien Belmonte, 2013. "Application of evidential networks in quantitative analysis of railway accidents," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(4), pages 368-384, August.
    16. Giulietti, Monica & Le Coq, Chloé & Willems, Bert & Anaya, Karim, 2019. "Smart Consumers in the Internet of Energy : Flexibility Markets & Services from Distributed Energy Resources," Other publications TiSEM 2edb43b5-bbd6-487d-abdf-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Yacov Y. Haimes, 2012. "Systems‐Based Guiding Principles for Risk Modeling, Planning, Assessment, Management, and Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(9), pages 1451-1467, September.
    18. Diaz, Rafael & Behr, Joshua G. & Acero, Beatriz, 2022. "Coastal housing recovery in a postdisaster environment: A supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    19. Chun Xia-Bauer & Florin Vondung & Stefan Thomas & Raphael Moser, 2022. "Business Model Innovations for Renewable Energy Prosumer Development in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Julie E. Shortridge & Benjamin F. Zaitchik, 2018. "Characterizing climate change risks by linking robust decision frameworks and uncertain probabilistic projections," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 525-539, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2766-:d:1616597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.