IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2235-d1605294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

POI Data–Driven Identification and Representation of Production–Living–Ecological Spaces at the Urban and Peri–Urban Scale: A Case Study of the Hohhot–Baotou–Ordos–Yulin Urban Agglomeration

Author

Listed:
  • Shuai Zhang

    (College of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China)

  • Yixin Fang

    (College of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China)

  • Xiuqing Zhao

    (College of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China)

Abstract

The identification of the multifunctional combination of production–living–ecological spaces (PLES) in urban agglomerations, particularly in urban cores and peri–urban areas, is a critical issue in the urbanization process. This study, using the Hohhot–Baotou–Ordos–Yulin (HBOY) urban agglomeration, a key node in China’s “Two Horizontals and Three Verticals” urbanization strategy, proposes a hexagonal grid–based PLES quantification framework using POI data. A three–level POI classification system was developed, with functional element weights determined via the Analytic Hierarchy Process and public perception surveys. The framework quantifies PLES within hexagonal grids and analyzes its patterns and functional coupling mechanisms using spatial overlay, Average Nearest Neighbor Index (ANNI), kernel density analysis, and spatial autocorrelation analysis. The following results were obtained. (1) PLES classification accuracy reached 90.83%, confirming the reliability of the method. (2) The HBOY urban agglomeration exhibits a dominant production space (40.84%), balanced living and ecological spaces (29.37% and 29.36%, respectively), and a severe shortage of mixed spaces (0.43%). (3) Production and living spaces show significant clustering ( A N N I ≤ 0.581), mixed spaces follow ( A N N I = 0.660), and ecological spaces are relatively evenly distributed ( A N N I = 0.870). (4) The spatial distribution patterns show that production and living spaces exhibit “core concentration with peripheral dispersion”, ecological spaces show “block concentration with point–like distribution”, and mixed spaces show “point–like dispersion”. (5) Production and living spaces exhibit strong spatial autocorrelation ( M o r a n ’ s I > 0.7) and the highest spatial correlation ( B i v a r i a t e M o r a n ’ s I = 0.692), while the spatial correlation with ecological spaces is weakest ( B i v a r i a t e M o r a n ’ s I = 0.150). The proposed PLES identification framework, with its efficiency and dynamic updating potential, provides an innovative approach to urban spatial governance under the global Sustainable Development Goals. The findings offer integrated decision–making support for spatial diagnosis and functional regulation in the ecologically vulnerable areas of northwest China’s new urbanization.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuai Zhang & Yixin Fang & Xiuqing Zhao, 2025. "POI Data–Driven Identification and Representation of Production–Living–Ecological Spaces at the Urban and Peri–Urban Scale: A Case Study of the Hohhot–Baotou–Ordos–Yulin Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2235-:d:1605294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2235/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2235/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guglielmo Pristeri & Francesca Peroni & Salvatore Eugenio Pappalardo & Daniele Codato & Anna Giulia Castaldo & Antonio Masi & Massimo De Marchi, 2020. "Mapping and Assessing Soil Sealing in Padua Municipality through Biotope Area Factor Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Feng Li & Guangdong Li, 2018. "Agglomeration and Spatial Spillover Effects of Regional Economic Growth in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Rolf Jens Brunstad & Ivar Gaasland & Erling Vardal, 2005. "Multifunctionality of agriculture: an inquiry into the complementarity between landscape preservation and food security," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 32(4), pages 469-488, December.
    4. Yingkai Tang & Kun Wang & Xuanming Ji & He Xu & Yangqing Xiao, 2021. "Assessment and Spatial-Temporal Evolution Analysis of Urban Land Use Efficiency under Green Development Orientation: Case of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomerations," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Lijing Dong & Lingyu Zhang, 2022. "Spatial Coupling Coordination Evaluation of Mixed Land Use and Urban Vitality in Major Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Mohamed Gafsi & Geneviève Nguyen & Bruno Legagneux & Patrice Robin, 2006. "Sustainability and multifunctionality in French farms: Analysis of the implementation of Territorial Farming Contracts," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 23(4), pages 463-475, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qenani-Petrela, Eivis & Noel, Jay E. & Mastin, Thomas, 2007. "A Benefit Transfer Approach to the Estimation of Agro-Ecosystems Services Benefits: A Case Study of Kern County, California," Research Project Reports 121605, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California Institute for the Study of Specialty Crops.
    2. Huber, Robert & Lehmann, Bernard, 2010. "Economies of Scope in the Agricultural Provision of Ecosystem Services: An Application to a High Cost Production Region," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 59(02), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Weiping Zhang & Peiji Shi & Huali Tong, 2022. "Research on Construction Land Use Benefit and the Coupling Coordination Relationship Based on a Three-Dimensional Frame Model—A Case Study in the Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Xiaoli Shi & Ying Chen & Menghan Xia & Yongli Zhang, 2022. "Effects of the Talent War on Urban Innovation in China: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Guancen Wu & Dongqin Yang & Xing Niu & Zixuan Mi, 2024. "The Impact of Park Green Space Areas on Urban Vitality: A Case Study of 35 Large and Medium-Sized Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Blandford, David & Gaasland, Ivar & Vårdal, Erling, 2014. "GHG abatement welfare cost curves for Norwegian agriculture," 88th Annual Conference, April 9-11, 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France 169734, Agricultural Economics Society.
    7. Blandford, David & Gaasland, Ivar & Vardal, Erling, 2011. "Activity level, emission intensity, and optimal GHG abatement policy: An application to Norwegian agriculture," 85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 108780, Agricultural Economics Society.
    8. Xinhai Lu & Zhenxing Shi & Jia Li & Junhao Dong & Mingjie Song & Jiao Hou, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Factor Flow on Urban Land Use Efficiency from the Perspective of Urbanization," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Guoqing Cui & Wenlong Zheng & Siliang Chen & Yue Dong & Tingyu Huang, 2022. "Study on the Spatial Pattern Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Inefficient Urban Land Use in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Can Zhang & Tengfei Liu & Jixia Li & Mengzhi Xu & Xu Li & Huachun Wang, 2023. "Economic Growth Target, Government Expenditure Behavior, and Cities’ Ecological Efficiency—Evidence from 284 Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-30, January.
    11. Kopainsky, Birgit & Flury, Christian & Giuliani, Gianluca, 2008. "Agriculture’s contribution to rural viability: An approach to estimate regional economic impacts of agricultural policy in Swiss case study regions," 107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain 6483, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Hao Su & Shuo Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    13. Qi, Guanqiu & Shi, Wenming & Lin, Kun-Chin & Yuen, Kum Fai & Xiao, Yi, 2020. "Spatial spillover effects of logistics infrastructure on regional development: Evidence from China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 96-114.
    14. Silvia Croce & Elisa D’Agnolo & Mauro Caini & Rossana Paparella, 2021. "The Use of Cool Pavements for the Regeneration of Industrial Districts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, June.
    15. Blandford, David & Gaasland, Ivar & Vårdal, Erling, 2013. "Trade-Off Between Food Production And Greenhouse Gas Mitigation In Norwegian Agriculture," Working Papers in Economics 01/13, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
    16. Yangyang Wang & Yanjun Liu & Guolei Zhou & Zuopeng Ma & Hongri Sun & Hui Fu, 2022. "Coordinated Relationship between Compactness and Land-Use Efficiency in Shrinking Cities: A Case Study of Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Özkan Gülzari, Şeyda & Åby, Bente Aspeholen & Persson, Tomas & Höglind, Mats & Mittenzwei, Klaus, 2017. "Combining models to estimate the impacts of future climate scenarios on feed supply, greenhouse gas emissions and economic performance on dairy farms in Norway," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 157-169.
    18. Mara Ottoboni & Salvatore Eugenio Pappalardo & Massimo De Marchi & Fabrizio Ungaro, 2023. "Characterization and Mapping of Public and Private Green Areas in the Municipality of Forlì (NE Italy) Using High-Resolution Images," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Thilo W. Glebe & Uwe Latacz-Lohmann, 2008. "Assessing the production and welfare effects of agri-environmental policy: a conceptual analysis," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 1(1), pages 75-92.
    20. Mark V. Brady & Jordan Hristov & Fredrik Wilhelmsson & Katarina Hedlund, 2019. "Roadmap for Valuing Soil Ecosystem Services to Inform Multi-Level Decision-Making in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2235-:d:1605294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.