IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1953-d1599137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological Innovations Shaping Sustainable Competitiveness—A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Muntaser Hamdouna

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznań, Poland)

  • Mariya Khmelyarchuk

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznań, Poland
    Faculty of Economics, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The concept of sustainable competitiveness is becoming increasingly relevant, as it combines the investigation of the factors that determine the competitive advantages of economic entities, as well as management strategies that ensure economic and environmental efficiency in the face of modern global requirements and challenges. The main hypothesis of the research is that technological innovations are key determinants of the sustainable competitiveness of economic entities, increase their resilience to various challenges and threats, and therefore contribute to sustainable competitiveness in the long run. Accordingly, the object of the research is a comprehensive science literature review at the intersection of the issues of competitiveness, technological innovations, and sustainable development using the Scopus database and PRISMA statement in order to substantiate the importance of technological innovation in ensuring sustainable competitiveness. The scientific research pinpoints three key questions shaping the scientific discussion: Are technological innovations key determinants of sustainable competitiveness? How do advanced technologies contribute across sectors? What strategies and measures stimulate sustainable competitiveness? By answering the research questions based on the methodology of nonempirical systematic scientific analysis, this review article provides scientific and practical insights for businesses and policymakers aiming to harness technological advancements to sustain their business in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Muntaser Hamdouna & Mariya Khmelyarchuk, 2025. "Technological Innovations Shaping Sustainable Competitiveness—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-45, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1953-:d:1599137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1953/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1953/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 109-123, February.
    2. Khalid Rasheed Memon & Say Keat Ooi & Heesup Han, 2024. "Responsible innovation and corporate sustainability performance: A structural equation modeling‐neural network approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2712-2730, May.
    3. Guilherme Luz Tortorella & Diego Fettermann, 2018. "Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(8), pages 2975-2987, April.
    4. Davide Antonioli & Claudia Ghisetti & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Francesco Nicolli, 2022. "Sustainable production: The economic returns of circular economy practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2603-2617, July.
    5. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    6. Olena Chygryn & Radoslaw Miskiewicz, 2022. "New Trends and Patterns in Green Competitiveness: A Bibliometric Analysis of Evolution," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 5(2), pages 24-42, September.
    7. Antonio Reinaldo Silva Neto & Miguel Gustavo Gomes da Silva & Fernando Henrique Taques & Thiago Poleto & Thyago Celso Cavalcante Nepomuceno & Victor Diogho Heuer de Carvalho & Madson Bruno da Silva Mo, 2024. "Multicriteria Analysis of Innovation Ecosystems and the Impact of Human Capital and Investments on Brazilian Industries," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, September.
    8. HERCIU Mihaela & OGREAN Claudia, 2018. "Business Sustainable Competitiveness – A Synergistic, Long-Run Approach Of A Company’S Resources And Results," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 13(3), pages 26-44, December.
    9. Broccardo, Laura & Zicari, Adrián & Jabeen, Fauzia & Bhatti, Zeeshan A., 2023. "How digitalization supports a sustainable business model: A literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Parrilli, M. Davide & Balavac-Orlić, Merima & Radicic, Dragana, 2023. "Environmental innovation across SMEs in Europe," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Marti, Luisa & Puertas, Rosa, 2023. "Analysis of European competitiveness based on its innovative capacity and digitalization level," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Dabbous, Amal & Barakat, Karine Aoun & Kraus, Sascha, 2023. "The impact of digitalization on entrepreneurial activity and sustainable competitiveness: A panel data analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    13. Jeremy Galbreath & Chia‐Yang Chang & Daniel Tisch, 2023. "The impact of a proactive environmental strategy on environmentally sustainable practices in service firms: The moderating effect of information use value," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5420-5434, December.
    14. Wu, WenTing & Chen, XiaoQian & Zvarych, Roman & Huang, WeiLun, 2024. "The Stackelberg duel between Central Bank Digital Currencies and private payment titans in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Kofi Mintah Oware & T. Mallikarjunappa, 2020. "Disability employment and financial performance: the effect of technological innovation of listed firms in India," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(3), pages 384-398, May.
    16. Shuai Shao & Zhigao Hu & Jianhua Cao & Lili Yang & Dabo Guan, 2020. "Environmental Regulation and Enterprise Innovation: A Review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1465-1478, March.
    17. Răzvan-Andrei Corboș & Ovidiu-Iulian Bunea & Daniel-Constantin Jiroveanu, 2023. "The Effects of Strategic Procurement 4.0 Performance on Organizational Competitiveness in the Circular Economy," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Yuliya Zaloznova & Nataliia Trushkina, 2019. "Management of logistic activities as a mechanism for providing sustainable development of enterprises in the digital economy," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 2(1), pages 64-81, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emanuela Todeva & Ruslan Rakhmatullin, 2016. "Industry Global Value Chains, Connectivity and Regional Smart Specialisation in Europe. An Overview of Theoretical Approaches and Mapping Methodologies," JRC Research Reports JRC102801, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Serrano García, Jakeline & Acevedo Álvarez, Carlos Alberto & Castelblanco Gómez, Johnatan Mauricio & Arbeláez Toro, Juan José, 2017. "Measuring organizational capabilities for technological innovation through a fuzzy inference system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 93-109.
    3. Kapetaniou, Chrystalla & Lee, Soo Hee, 2017. "A framework for assessing the performance of universities: The case of Cyprus," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 169-180.
    4. Marvello Yang & Norizan Jaafar & Abdullah Al Mamun & Anas A. Salameh & Noorshella Che Nawi, 2022. "Modelling the significance of strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid SEM–neural network analysis," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    5. Helge Svare & Anne Haugen Gausdal, 2017. "Dynamic capabilities and network benefits," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(1), pages 117-146.
    6. Sjoerd Hardeman, 2013. "Organization level research in scientometrics: a plea for an explicit pragmatic approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(3), pages 1175-1194, March.
    7. Alessandra Neri & Marta Negri & Enrico Cagno & Vikas Kumar & Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes, 2023. "What digital‐enabled dynamic capabilities support the circular economy? A multiple case study approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 5083-5101, November.
    8. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    9. Zhang, Ruihan & Li, Xiaodong & Yan, Xin & Bian, Yiwen, 2024. "Does customer concentration matter in business model value: Threshold effects of carbon emissions and dynamic capabilities?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    10. Dietlmeier, Simon Frederic & Urmetzer, Florian, 2023. "Policy-Driven Industrial Ecosystems," MPRA Paper 120559, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Clement R. Mumba Jr, 2024. "Factors Influencing Sustainable Entrepreneurship Development in Zambia: A Case Study of Chingola Town," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 4019-4084, September.
    12. van Rijnsoever, Frank J. & Kempkes, Sander N. & Chappin, Maryse M.H., 2017. "Seduced into collaboration: A resource-based choice experiment to explain make, buy or ally strategies of SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 284-297.
    13. Buenstorf, Guido & Schacht, Alexander, 2013. "We need to talk – or do we? Geographic distance and the commercialization of technologies from public research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 465-480.
    14. Margit Kirs & Veiko Lember & Erkki Karo, 2021. "Technology transfer in economic periphery: Emerging patterns and policy challenges," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(6), pages 677-706, November.
    15. María Alejandra Molina, 2011. "A Sectoral System of Innovation Analysis of Technological Upgrading in the Food Processing Sector in Argentina, Brazil and Chile," Institutions and Economies (formerly known as International Journal of Institutions and Economies), Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, vol. 3(2), pages 287-325, July.
    16. Liu, Yanping & Farooque, Muhammad & Lee, Chang-Hun & Gong, Yu & Zhang, Abraham, 2023. "Antecedents of circular manufacturing and its effect on environmental and financial performance: A practice-based view," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    17. Oliveira-Dias, Diéssica de & Maqueira-Marin, Juan Manuel & Moyano-Fuentes, José & Carvalho, Helena, 2023. "Implications of using Industry 4.0 base technologies for lean and agile supply chains and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    18. Bingqin Dai & Wenquan Liang, 2022. "The Impact of Big Data Technical Skills on Novel Business Model Innovation Based on the Role of Resource Integration and Environmental Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2021. "Innovation Systems and Income Inequality: In Search of Causal Mechanisms," Working Papers 56, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Nov 2021.
    20. Fernandes, Cristina & Ferreira, João, 2011. "Knowledge Spillovers and Knowledge Intensive Business Services: An Empirical Study," MPRA Paper 34751, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1953-:d:1599137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.