IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1658-d1592874.html

Coal Mines and Multi-Faceted Risks in the United States: On a Path Toward a Sustainable Future or Emptying Out?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael R. Greenberg

    (Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA)

  • Dona Schneider

    (Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA)

Abstract

Coal is a major source of fuel in many countries, but its mining and use increase the impacts on human and environmental health. Given the wide variation in coal use by nation, we focused on one—the United States. Specifically, we examined the public health, community, and demographic characteristics of 130 U.S. counties with underground and/or surface coal mines that exemplify a land use that leads to a combination of natural and anthropogenic risks. We compared these 130 to other U.S. counties, finding that the coal counties had poorer health outcomes and behaviors, fewer community assets, lower socioeconomic status, and higher population losses compared to the remaining counties in their host states and other U.S. counties. Next, we looked for differences within the 130 coal counties. Counties with the most coal mines and production had the worst outcomes, especially when located in rural areas. We then examined federal programs to assist these coal communities, observing that the largest federal government programs appear to be sending more resources to the most distressed coal counties compared to the less distressed ones. The daunting challenge for the most heavily coal-dependent counties, their state governments, and federal government supporters is to jointly develop plans that are realistic and affordable, take advantage of local natural and human resources, and offer a path to sustainable existence. If the efforts do not succeed, these places run the risk of becoming politically invisible and their populations are likely to empty out.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael R. Greenberg & Dona Schneider, 2025. "Coal Mines and Multi-Faceted Risks in the United States: On a Path Toward a Sustainable Future or Emptying Out?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1658-:d:1592874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1658/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1658/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Stephen & Alexandroff, Alan, 2019. "Current and future struggles to eliminate coal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 511-520.
    2. Yuan, Jiahai & Lei, Qi & Xiong, Minpeng & Guo, Jingsheng & Hu, Zheng, 2016. "The prospective of coal power in China: Will it reach a plateau in the coming decade?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 495-504.
    3. Haggerty, Julia H. & Haggerty, Mark N. & Roemer, Kelli & Rose, Jackson, 2018. "Planning for the local impacts of coal facility closure: Emerging strategies in the U.S. West," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 69-80.
    4. Sanya Carley & Tom P. Evans & Michelle Graff & David M. Konisky, 2018. "A framework for evaluating geographic disparities in energy transition vulnerability," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 621-627, August.
    5. Benjamin K. Sovacool & Raphael J. Heffron & Darren McCauley & Andreas Goldthau, 2016. "Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(5), pages 1-6, May.
    6. Squalli, Jay, 2017. "Renewable energy, coal as a baseload power source, and greenhouse gas emissions: Evidence from U.S. state-level data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 479-488.
    7. Peter Roberts, 2006. "Evaluating regional sustainable development: Approaches, methods and the politics of analysis," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 515-532.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qian, Yu & Xu, Zeshui & Qin, Yong & Gou, Xunjie, 2025. "A critical review on the multidimensional complexity of sustainable energy development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 394(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roemer, Kelli F. & Haggerty, Julia H., 2021. "Coal communities and the U.S. energy transition: A policy corridors assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Helmke-Long, Laura & Carley, Sanya & Konisky, David M., 2022. "Municipal government adaptive capacity programs for vulnerable populations during the U.S. energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Delina, Laurence L. & Afable, Sanny D. & Chan, Chloe, 2025. "Bridging the rural–urban energy transition divide: Place-specific challenges in renewable energy transitions for vulnerable communities in the Philippines," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    4. Raimi, Daniel, 2021. "Mapping County-Level Exposure and Vulnerability to the US Energy Transition," RFF Working Paper Series 21-36, Resources for the Future.
    5. Forrester, Sydney P. & Reames, Tony G., 2020. "Understanding the residential energy efficiency financing coverage gap and market potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. Anggi Putri Kurniadi & Hasdi Aimon & Zamroni Salim & Ragimun Ragimun & Adang Sonjaya & Sigit Setiawan & Viktor Siagian & Lokot Zein Nasution & R Nurhidajat & Mutaqin Mutaqin & Joko Sabtohadi, 2024. "Analysis of Existing and Forecasting for Coal and Solar Energy Consumption on Climate Change in Asia Pacific: New Evidence for Sustainable Development Goals," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 352-359, July.
    7. Nathalie Spittler & Ganna Gladkykh & Arnaud Diemer & Brynhildur Davidsdottir, 2019. "Understanding the Current Energy Paradigm and Energy System Models for More Sustainable Energy System Development," Post-Print hal-02127724, HAL.
    8. Hogan, Jessica L. & Warren, Charles R. & Simpson, Michael & McCauley, Darren, 2022. "What makes local energy projects acceptable? Probing the connection between ownership structures and community acceptance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    9. Wan, Qilong & Qian, Jine & Baghirli, Araz & Aghayev, Aligul, 2022. "Green finance and carbon reduction: Implications for green recovery," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 901-913.
    10. Dong, Kangyin & Sun, Renjin & Li, Hui & Liao, Hua, 2018. "Does natural gas consumption mitigate CO2 emissions: Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for 14 Asia-Pacific countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 419-429.
    11. Ploy Achakulwisut & Peter Erickson & Céline Guivarch & Roberto Schaeffer & Elina Brutschin & Steve Pye, 2023. "Global fossil fuel reduction pathways under different climate mitigation strategies and ambitions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Mouter, Niek & de Geest, Auke & Doorn, Neelke, 2018. "A values-based approach to energy controversies: Value-sensitive design applied to the Groningen gas controversy in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 639-648.
    13. Zhao, Changhong & Zhang, Weirong & Wang, Yang & Liu, Qilin & Guo, Jingsheng & Xiong, Minpeng & Yuan, Jiahai, 2017. "The economics of coal power generation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-9.
    14. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Lipson, Matthew M. & Chard, Rose, 2019. "Temporality, vulnerability, and energy justice in household low carbon innovations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 495-504.
    15. Sarah Mittlefehldt & Erin Bunting & Emily Huff & Joseph Welsh & Robert Goodwin, 2021. "New Methods for Assessing Sustainability of Wood-Burning Energy Facilities: Combining Historical and Spatial Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Zhang, Yali & Li, Wenqi & Wu, Feng, 2020. "Does energy transition improve air quality? Evidence derived from China’s Winter Clean Heating Pilot (WCHP) project," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    17. Peterson K. Ozili & Paul Terhemba Iorember, 2024. "Financial stability and sustainable development," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 2620-2646, July.
    18. Frate, Cláudio Albuquerque & Brannstrom, Christian & de Morais, Marcus Vinícius Girão & Caldeira-Pires, Armando de Azevedo, 2019. "Procedural and distributive justice inform subjectivity regarding wind power: A case from Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 185-195.
    19. Lan, Haifeng & Gou, Zhonghua & Lu, Yi, 2021. "Machine learning approach to understand regional disparity of residential solar adoption in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    20. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela, 2024. "Demonstrating the need for a just transition: Socioeconomic diagnosis of polish cities living on hard coal mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1658-:d:1592874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.