IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9302-d1775270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Environmental Expenditure, Signaling Mechanism, and Green Innovation Behavior: Evidence from Chinese A-Share Listed Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Jingya Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xilong Yao

    (School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The environmental protection expenditure of enterprises is an important investment in the process of developing green innovation. Although a large number of researchers have evaluated the factors promoting green innovation, few have studied the impact of environmental protection expenditure of enterprises on green innovation, and signal transmission is an important mechanism. This paper selects the data of China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2012 to 2023, obtains the data of enterprise environmental protection investment through a manual collection and keyword screening method, and analyzes the micro impact of enterprise environmental protection investment on green innovation output by using a two-way fixed corresponding method. The empirical results show that the environmental protection expenditure of enterprises will significantly promote green innovation. At the same time, the green innovation effect of enterprise environmental protection expenditure is also different due to enterprise scale, financing constraints, and life cycle. At the same time, this paper verifies the signal transmission mechanism of enterprises’ environmental protection expenditure, that is, enterprises’ investment in environmental protection which will release positive signals to the outside so as to strive for more social resources. Further empirical analysis verifies the promotion effect of enterprise environmental protection expenditure on performance. This paper asserts that enterprises should play a positive role in environmental protection investment, and government departments should increase support for enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingya Wang & Xilong Yao, 2025. "Corporate Environmental Expenditure, Signaling Mechanism, and Green Innovation Behavior: Evidence from Chinese A-Share Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9302-:d:1775270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9302/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9302/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Xiaoran & Ran, Rong & Chen, Yejing & Zhang, Jie, 2024. "Does digital government transformation drive regional green innovation? Evidence from cities in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Rennings, Klaus, 2000. "Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 319-332, February.
    3. Wenjing Li & Xiaoyan Lu, 2016. "Institutional Interest, Ownership Type, and Environmental Capital Expenditures: Evidence from the Most Polluting Chinese Listed Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 459-476, October.
    4. Sandra A. Waddock & Samuel B. Graves, 1997. "The Corporate Social Performance–Financial Performance Link," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 303-319, April.
    5. Usama Awan & Marlen Gabriele Arnold & Ismail Gölgeci, 2021. "Enhancing green product and process innovation: Towards an integrative framework of knowledge acquisition and environmental investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1283-1295, February.
    6. Lee Fleming & Olav Sorenson, 2004. "Science as a map in technological search," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(8‐9), pages 909-928, August.
    7. Jiang, Li & Bai, Yu, 2022. "Strategic or substantive innovation? -The impact of institutional investors' site visits on green innovation evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Zhang, Dongyang, 2023. "Subsidy expiration and greenwashing decision: Is there a role of bankruptcy risk?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liao, Zhongju & Liu, Xiaodie & Sun, Yang, 2023. "Can corporate background characteristics predict environmental innovation? Evidence from a meta-analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1047-1055.
    2. Zheng, Suyi & Wen, Jiandong, 2024. "Green public procurement and corporate environmental performance: An empirical analysis based on data from green procurement contracts," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    3. Quatraro, Francesco & Scandura, Alessandra, 2019. "Academic Inventors and the Antecedents of Green Technologies. A Regional Analysis of Italian Patent Data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 247-263.
    4. Pereira, Vijay & Nair, Asha KS. & Bhattacharyya, Som Sekhar, 2025. "Exploring and investigating the complementarity and multidimensionality of innovation for sustainability research: Past present and future," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    5. Albino, Vito & Ardito, Lorenzo & Dangelico, Rosa Maria & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2014. "Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: A patent analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 836-854.
    6. Liu, Liqian & Feng, Amei & Liu, Mingxia, 2024. "The effect of green innovation on corporate financial performance: Does quality matter?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    7. Qiuqin He & Samuel Ribeiro-Navarrete & Dolores Botella-Carrubi, 2024. "A matter of motivation: the impact of enterprise digital transformation on green innovation," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 1489-1518, May.
    8. Arnaldo Coelho & Jorge Ferreira & Catarina Proença, 2024. "The impact of green entrepreneurial orientation on sustainability performance through the effects of green product and process innovation: The moderating role of ambidexterity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3184-3202, May.
    9. Di Luan & Hongjun Cao & Tongkun Qu, 2023. "How Does Corporate Green Innovation Strategy Translate into Green Innovation Performance Based on Chain Mediation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Xie, Ronghui & Teo, Thompson S.H., 2022. "Green technology innovation, environmental externality, and the cleaner upgrading of industrial structure in China — Considering the moderating effect of environmental regulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Iulia Siedschlag & Stefano Meneto & Manuel Tong Koecklin, 2022. "Enabling Green Innovations for the Circular Economy: What Factors Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Wagner, Marcus, 2008. "Links between sustainability-related innovation and sustainability management," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2008-046, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    13. Yufei Wang & Xiufan Zhang & Yan Wang & Xueli Chen & Malin Song, 2024. "The road to sustainable development: Results of the differentiated choice of corporate environmental strategy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 2990-3003, August.
    14. Ouidad Yousfi & Nadia Loukil, 2021. "Why should firms achieve strategic CSR?," Post-Print hal-03145064, HAL.
    15. Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2019. "A Framework to Explicate the Relationship Between CSER and Financial Performance: an Intellectual Capital-Based Approach and Knowledge-Based View of Firm," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(4), pages 1427-1446, December.
    16. Liao, Zhongju & Chen, Jie & Chen, Xueli & Song, Malin, 2024. "Digital platform capability, environmental innovation quality, and firms’ competitive advantage: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    17. Banerjee, Rajabrata & Gupta, Kartick, 2019. "The effect of environmentally sustainable practices on firm R&D: International evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 262-274.
    18. Sara Walton & Annie Zhang & Conor O'Kane, 2020. "Energy eco‐innovations for sustainable development: Exploring organizational strategic capabilities through an energy cultures framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 812-826, March.
    19. Beata Bal-Domańska & Elżbieta Stańczyk & Mirosława Szewczyk, 2025. "Empirical Evidence on Pro-Environmental Activities of Companies in Times of Energy Transformation: A Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Fen Zhang & Xiaonan Qin & Lina Liu, 2020. "The Interaction Effect between ESG and Green Innovation and Its Impact on Firm Value from the Perspective of Information Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9302-:d:1775270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.