IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9301-d1775230.html

A Systemic Evaluation of Energy Digital Transformation Policies for the G20 Group of Countries: A Four-Dimensional Framework and Cross-National Quantitative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Wang

    (School of Law, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Baomin Wang

    (School of Law, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

Abstract

The global integration of digital technologies into energy systems constitutes a critical pathway for achieving sustainable and intelligent energy governance. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the energy digital transformation policies across eighteen major economies through a comprehensive four-dimensional framework, which encompasses policy objectives, intensity, instruments, and stakeholder engagement. Through the application of the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method, our comparative analysis identifies a distinct hierarchy in national policy performance. The first tier, including the United Kingdom, the United States, South Korea, Australia, China, and Germany, demonstrates high coherence, enforceable mechanisms, and multi-actor coordination. The second tier, comprising Saudi Arabia, France, Turkey, Russia, Canada, and India, exhibits partial alignment with notable strengths in selected dimensions yet significant gaps in enforceability or stakeholder integration. The third tier, featuring Italy, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Japan, and Indonesia, is characterized by fragmented approaches and aspirational goals lacking implementation specificity. Stakeholder inclusiveness emerges as the most influential dimension, accounting for 38.3% of total weighting and substantially accounting for variations in efficacy. Moreover, nonlinear threshold effects are identified, indicating that subcritical performance in any dimension leads to disproportionate declines in overall outcomes. These findings underscore that synergistic policy design, which entails balancing objectives, governance capacity, instruments, and actors, is indispensable for effective energy digitalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Wang & Baomin Wang, 2025. "A Systemic Evaluation of Energy Digital Transformation Policies for the G20 Group of Countries: A Four-Dimensional Framework and Cross-National Quantitative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9301-:d:1775230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9301/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9301/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kanellakis, M. & Martinopoulos, G. & Zachariadis, T., 2013. "European energy policy—A review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1020-1030.
    2. Sareen, Siddharth & Haarstad, Håvard, 2018. "Bridging socio-technical and justice aspects of sustainable energy transitions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 624-632.
    3. Ajagekar, Akshay & You, Fengqi, 2022. "Quantum computing and quantum artificial intelligence for renewable and sustainable energy: A emerging prospect towards climate neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Ferdaus, Md Meftahul & Dam, Tanmoy & Anavatti, Sreenatha & Das, Sarobi, 2024. "Digital technologies for a net-zero energy future: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Sanya Carley, 2011. "The Era of State Energy Policy Innovation: A Review of Policy Instruments," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 28(3), pages 265-294, May.
    6. Patlitzianas, Konstantinos D. & Doukas, Haris & Kagiannas, Argyris G. & Psarras, John, 2008. "Sustainable energy policy indicators: Review and recommendations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 966-973.
    7. Maroufkhani, Parisa & Desouza, Kevin C. & Perrons, Robert K. & Iranmanesh, Mohammad, 2022. "Digital transformation in the resource and energy sectors: A systematic review," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Sandra Giraldo & David la Rotta & César Nieto-Londoño & Rafael E. Vásquez & Ana Escudero-Atehortúa, 2021. "Digital Transformation of Energy Companies: A Colombian Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Hua, Weiqi & Jiang, Jing & Sun, Hongjian & Wu, Jianzhong, 2020. "A blockchain based peer-to-peer trading framework integrating energy and carbon markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    10. Sławomira Hajduk & Dorota Jelonek, 2021. "A Decision-Making Approach Based on TOPSIS Method for Ranking Smart Cities in the Context of Urban Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Solomon, Barry D. & Krishna, Karthik, 2011. "The coming sustainable energy transition: History, strategies, and outlook," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 7422-7431.
    12. Roy Rothwell & Walter Zegveld, 1984. "An Assessment Of Government Innovation Policies," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 3(3‐4), pages 436-444, May.
    13. Kingsley Ukoba & Kehinde O. Olatunji & Eyitayo Adeoye & Tien-Chien Jen & Daniel M. Madyira, 2024. "Optimizing renewable energy systems through artificial intelligence: Review and future prospects," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(7), pages 3833-3879, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferdaus, Md Meftahul & Dam, Tanmoy & Anavatti, Sreenatha & Das, Sarobi, 2024. "Digital technologies for a net-zero energy future: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Xiaoling Wang & Jatin Nathwani & Chunyou Wu, 2016. "Visualization of International Energy Policy Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Irina Georgescu & Ayşe Meriç Yazıcı & Vildan Bayram & Mesut Öztırak & Ayşegül Toy & Mesut Dogan, 2025. "Governing the Green Transition: The Role of Artificial Intelligence, Green Finance, and Institutional Governance in Achieving the SDGs Through Renewable Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Le, Thai-Ha & Chang, Youngho & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Yoshino, Naoyuki, 2019. "Energy insecurity in Asia: A multi-dimensional analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 84-95.
    5. Janel Jett & Leigh Raymond, 2021. "Issue Framing and U.S. State Energy and Climate Policy Choice," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(3), pages 278-299, May.
    6. Rohan Best & Paul J. Burke, 2020. "Energy mix persistence and the effect of carbon pricing," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 555-574, July.
    7. Wang, Dongxue & Fan, Ruguo & Yang, Peiwen & Du, Kang & Xu, Xiaoxia & Chen, Rongkai, 2024. "Research on floating real-time pricing strategy for microgrid operator in local energy market considering shared energy storage leasing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    8. Upham, Dr Paul & Sovacool, Prof Benjamin & Ghosh, Dr Bipashyee, 2022. "Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Doukas, Haris & Papadopoulou, Alexandra & Savvakis, Nikolaos & Tsoutsos, Theocharis & Psarras, John, 2012. "Assessing energy sustainability of rural communities using Principal Component Analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 1949-1957.
    10. Pashakolaie, Vahid Ghorbani & Gudlaugsson, Bjarnhedinn & Ahmed, Tariq G., 2026. "From investment to impact: Exploring socio-economic prospect of hydrogen investment in Tees Valley, UK," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. P.W.J. de Bijl & Helanya Fourie, 2019. "The energy transition: Does ownership matter for realizing public interest objectives?," Working Papers 19-24, Utrecht School of Economics.
    12. Knopf, Brigitte & Nahmmacher, Paul & Schmid, Eva, 2015. "The European renewable energy target for 2030 – An impact assessment of the electricity sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 50-60.
    13. Boyao Zhang & Liping Xu, 2025. "Research on Policy Optimization for Coordinated Development of Digital Content Industry in China’s Yangtze River Delta Region—Based on the PMC-Index Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    14. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Li, Jiangnan & Yan, Jingyang, 2025. "Can artificial intelligence contribute to the new energy system? Based on the perspective of labor supply," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Luigi Romano & Marcello Ruberti, 2019. "Focus on the Performances of the Most Advanced Italian Thermoelectric Power Plants," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 264-273.
    16. David Gattie & Michael Hewitt, 2023. "National Security as a Value-Added Proposition for Advanced Nuclear Reactors: A U.S. Focus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-26, August.
    17. Büttgen, Marion & al.,, 2021. "Blockchain in Service Management and Service Research - Developing a Research Agenda and Managerial Implications," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 5(2), pages 71-102.
    18. Black, Geoffrey & Holley, Donald & Solan, David & Bergloff, Michael, 2014. "Fiscal and economic impacts of state incentives for wind energy development in the Western United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 136-144.
    19. He, Yugang, 2026. "Rewiring industrial futures: The role of AI-enabled digital twins in energy productivity transitions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    20. Paweł Brusiło & Andrzej Tomski, 2026. "The dynamic panel gravity model of trade in photovoltaic cell panels in the Asia–Pacific region," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 857-885, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9301-:d:1775230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.