IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9218-d1773722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathways Through Which Digital Technology Use Facilitates Farmers’ Adoption of Green Agricultural Technologies: A Comprehensive Study Based on Grounded Theory and Empirical Testing

Author

Listed:
  • Xiyang Yin

    (College of Public Administration, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan 625014, China)

  • Wanyi Li

    (College of Public Administration, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan 625014, China)

  • Shuyu Tang

    (College of Public Administration, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan 625014, China)

  • Yanjiao Li

    (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Jianhua Zhao

    (Business and Communication, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia)

  • Pengpeng Tian

    (College of Public Administration, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan 625014, China)

Abstract

The use of digital technologies can break down information barriers in rural areas, thereby creating crucial conditions for the widespread adoption of green agricultural technologies (GATs) among farmers. To explore the relationship between digital technology use (DTU) and farmers’ adoption of GATs, this study draws on 18 in-depth interviews and 608 survey responses collected from rice farmers in Sichuan Province, China. By adopting a mixed-methods design, it offers a comprehensive examination of the mechanisms through which digital technology use (DTU) promotes the adoption of green agricultural technologies (GATs) among farmers. Grounded theory analysis reveals that the DTU–GATs adoption pathway can be conceptualized within a “condition–process–outcome” framework. Specifically, digital infrastructure, farmers’ capital endowment, and practical needs constitute the foundational conditions, while technology perception and the regional soft environment act as key mediating processes. The ultimate outcomes include improvements in economic performance, social well-being, and ecological sustainability. Empirical evidence confirms that DTU significantly promotes the adoption of GATs, primarily by enhancing farmers’ perceptions of technology and improving the agricultural soft environment at the regional level. Moreover, the effects of DTU display substantial heterogeneity across different types of green technologies and among various farmer groups. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening digital infrastructure in rural areas, enhancing farmers’ digital literacy and capacity, and leveraging digital tools to tailor the dissemination and guidance of GATs. Such efforts are essential to raise farmers’ awareness, foster a supportive soft environment for sustainable agriculture, and ultimately advance the adoption of GATs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiyang Yin & Wanyi Li & Shuyu Tang & Yanjiao Li & Jianhua Zhao & Pengpeng Tian, 2025. "Pathways Through Which Digital Technology Use Facilitates Farmers’ Adoption of Green Agricultural Technologies: A Comprehensive Study Based on Grounded Theory and Empirical Testing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9218-:d:1773722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9218/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9218/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soul‐kifouly G. Midingoyi & Menale Kassie & Beatrice Muriithi & Gracious Diiro & Sunday Ekesi, 2019. "Do Farmers and the Environment Benefit from Adopting Integrated Pest Management Practices? Evidence from Kenya," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 452-470, June.
    2. Xinhui Peng & Xiaohuan Yan & Hongmei Wang, 2024. "Study on the Effect of Digital Technology Adoption and Farmers’ Cognition on Fertilizer Reduction and Efficiency Improvement Behavior," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Xianpei Hong & Ying-Ju Chen & Yeming Gong & Hua Wang, 2024. "Farmers' green technology adoption : Implications from government subsidies and information sharing," Post-Print hal-04339466, HAL.
    4. Feder, Gershon & Just, Richard E & Zilberman, David, 1985. "Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(2), pages 255-298, January.
    5. Manu Goyal & Serguei Netessine, 2007. "Strategic Technology Choice and Capacity Investment Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 192-207, February.
    6. Foyuan Kuang & Jiatong Li & Jianjun Jin & Xin Qiu, 2023. "Do Green Production Technologies Improve Household Income? Evidence from Rice Farmers in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Guo, Zhangdong & Chen, Xiaoqi & Zhang, Yongwang, 2022. "Impact of environmental regulation perception on farmers' agricultural green production technology adoption: A new perspective of social capital," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Adnan, Nadia & Nordin, Shahrina Md & Ali, Murad, 2018. "A solution for the sunset industry: Adoption of Green Fertiliser Technology amongst Malaysian paddy farmers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 575-584.
    9. Shen, Zhiyang & Wang, Songkai & Boussemart, Jean-Philippe & Hao, Yu, 2022. "Digital transition and green growth in Chinese agriculture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    10. Yunlong Sui & Qiang Gao, 2023. "Farmers’ Endowments, Technology Perception and Green Production Technology Adoption Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Jenny C. Aker & Ishita Ghosh & Jenna Burrell, 2016. "The promise (and pitfalls) of ICT for agriculture initiatives," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(S1), pages 35-48, November.
    12. Harou, Aurélie P. & Madajewicz, Malgosia & Michelson, Hope & Palm, Cheryl A. & Amuri, Nyambilila & Magomba, Christopher & Semoka, Johnson M. & Tschirhart, Kevin & Weil, Ray, 2022. "The joint effects of information and financing constraints on technology adoption: Evidence from a field experiment in rural Tanzania," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Yanmei Yuan & Le Sun & Zongyun She & Shengwei Chen, 2025. "Influence of Digital Literacy on Farmers’ Adoption Behavior of Low-Carbon Agricultural Technology: Chain Intermediary Role Based on Capital Endowment and Adoption Willingness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Chai, Yuan & J. Pannell, David & G. Pardey, Philip, 2023. "Nudging farmers to reduce water pollution from nitrogen fertilizer," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Yu Du & Hui Feng & Qingsong Zhang & Shaofeng Zheng, 2025. "Influence of Information Literacy on Farmers’ Green Production Technology Adoption Behavior: The Moderating Role of Risk Attitude," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Unay-Gailhard, İlkay & Bojnec, Štefan, 2015. "Farm size and participation in agri-environmental measures: Farm-level evidence from Slovenia," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46, pages 273-282.
    17. Haoyuan Liu & Zhe Chen & Suyue Wen & Jizhou Zhang & Xianli Xia, 2025. "Impact of Digital Literacy on Farmers’ Adoption Behaviors of Green Production Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    18. Martey, Edward & Etwire, Prince Maxwell & Abdoulaye, Tahirou, 2020. "Welfare impacts of climate-smart agriculture in Ghana: Does row planting and drought-tolerant maize varieties matter?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    19. Bo Liu & Na Li & Cairong Liao, 2024. "Effects of Social Capital on the Adoption of Green Production Technologies by Rice Farmers: Moderation Effects Based on Risk Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Frederik von Briel & Per Davidsson & Jan Recker, 2018. "Digital Technologies as External Enablers of New Venture Creation in the IT Hardware Sector," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(1), pages 47-69, January.
    21. Chengmin Li & Haoyu Deng & Guoxin Yu & Rong Kong & Jian Liu, 2024. "Impact Effects of Cooperative Participation on the Adoption Behavior of Green Production Technologies by Cotton Farmers and the Driving Mechanisms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dalin Zhang & Feng Dong & Zhicheng Li & Sulan Xu, 2025. "How Can Farmers’ Green Production Behavior Be Promoted? A Literature Review of Drivers and Incentives for Behavioral Change," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Haoyuan Liu & Zhe Chen & Suyue Wen & Jizhou Zhang & Xianli Xia, 2025. "Impact of Digital Literacy on Farmers’ Adoption Behaviors of Green Production Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Jiaxi Zhou & Guoxiong Zhao & Liuyang Yao, 2025. "Peer Effects and Rural Households’ Online Shopping Behavior: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Mao, Hui & Zhou, Li & Ying, RuiYao & Pan, Dan, 2021. "Time Preferences and green agricultural technology adoption: Field evidence from rice farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Xu, Dingde & Liu, Yi & Li, Yichao & Liu, Shaoquan & Liu, Guihua, 2024. "Effect of farmland scale on agricultural green production technology adoption: Evidence from rice farmers in Jiangsu Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    6. Nguyen Duc Kien & Truong Quang Dung & Dinh Thi Kim Oanh & Le Thanh An & Nguyen Cong Dinh & Nguyen Thai Phan & Le Thi Thanh Nga, 2023. "Climate‐resilient practices and welfare impacts on rice‐cultivating households in Vietnam: Does joint adoption of multiple practices matter?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(2), pages 263-284, April.
    7. Yuyang Li & Jiahui Li & Xinjie Li & Qian Lu, 2024. "Does Participation in Digital Supply and Marketing Promote Smallholder Farmers’ Adoption of Green Agricultural Production Technologies?," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Usman Alhassan & Emmanuel Umoru Haruna, 2024. "Rural farmers’ perceptions of and adaptations to climate change in Sub-Saharan Africa: Does climate-smart agriculture (CSA) matter in Nigeria and Ethiopia?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 26(3), pages 613-652, July.
    9. Michelson, Hope & Fairbairn, Anna & Ellison, Brenna & Maertens, Annemie & Manyong, Victor, 2021. "Misperceived quality: Fertilizer in Tanzania," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Michelson, Hope & Gourlay, Sydney & Lybbert, Travis & Wollburg, Philip, 2023. "Review: Purchased agricultural input quality and small farms," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Beata Michaliszyn-Gabryś & Joachim Bronder & Janusz Krupanek, 2024. "Social Life Cycle Assessment of Laser Weed Control System: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Xinyue Qu & Wenfeng Zhou & Jia He & Dingde Xu, 2023. "Land Certification, Adjustment Experience, and Green Production Technology Acceptance of Farmers: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Tesei, Andrea & Ponticelli, Jacopo & Gupta, Apoorv, 2019. "Technology Adoption and Access to Credit via Mobile Phones," CEPR Discussion Papers 13956, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Varshney, Deepak & Joshi, P.K. & Roy, Devesh & Kumar, Anjani, 2021. "Understanding the Adoption of Modern Cultivars in India: Adoption probability and use intensity," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(01), January.
    15. Yi Cai & Wene Qi & Famin Yi, 2023. "Smartphone use and willingness to adopt digital pest and disease management: Evidence from litchi growers in rural China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 131-147, January.
    16. Ali Sher & Saman Mazhar & Iman Islami & Yenny Katherine Parra Acosta & Ramona Balc & Hossein Azadi & Hongping Yuan, 2025. "Land Use Practices: Sustainability Impacts on Smallholder Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Luo, Yuke & Liu, Shiyuan & Zhang, Yang & Zeng, Miao & Zhao, Dandi, 2025. "Digital pathways to resilience: Assessing the impact of digitalization on agricultural production resilience in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    18. Xiaoyu Liu & Junlan Xiang & Ling Qiu & Xinhong Fu & Yuying Liu, 2025. "Research on cooperative's information services, farmers' cognition, and fertilizer reduction behavior: evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4513-4539, February.
    19. Lasdun, Violet & Harou, Aurelie P. & Magomba, Christopher & Guerena, David, 2022. "Peer Learning in a Digital Farmer-to-Farmer Network: Effects on Technology Adoption and Self-Efficacy Beliefs," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 322561, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Wu Zhao & Zhiye Liang & Binrong Li, 2022. "Realizing a Rural Sustainable Development through a Digital Village Construction: Experiences from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9218-:d:1773722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.