IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9217-d1773744.html

Research on the Cultivation of Sustainable Innovation Dynamics in Private Technology Enterprises Based on Tripartite Evolution Game in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Liu

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Renyong Hou

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Jinwei Wang

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Weihua Peng

    (Business School, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China)

  • Zhijie Liao

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of intensifying global technological competition and the deepening of the national innovation-driven strategy, private technology enterprises, as the core entities of technological innovation, have their sustainable innovation dynamics profoundly influenced by the strategic interactions among multiple parties such as the government, enterprises, and users. Based on evolutionary game theory, this paper constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model involving the government, private technology enterprises, and market users in the Chinese context. Through theoretical deduction and multi-scenario numerical simulation using Matlab, it systematically analyzes the logic of strategic choices and the laws of dynamic equilibrium of the three parties in the process of sustainable innovation. The research shows that the strategic evolution of multiple entities presents multiple equilibrium states. There exist critical thresholds for the intensity of policy support, the concentration of market competition, and users’ willingness to choose innovative products; beyond these thresholds, the marginal impact on sustainable innovation dynamics increases significantly. Further research finds that the government and enterprises need to compensate for the profit gap between users’ choice of innovative products and traditional products through a subsidy mechanism to form a positive cycle of “active innovation–market recognition–profit improvement”. This study enriches the theoretical system of multi-entity innovation dynamics by incorporating user behavior and provides a decision-making reference for optimizing innovation governance and fostering the development of sustainable innovation dynamics in private enterprises in China and other similar economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Liu & Renyong Hou & Jinwei Wang & Weihua Peng & Zhijie Liao, 2025. "Research on the Cultivation of Sustainable Innovation Dynamics in Private Technology Enterprises Based on Tripartite Evolution Game in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9217-:d:1773744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9217/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9217/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinhua Guo & Ying Zhang & Cuizhen Cao & Hasan Dinçer, 2022. "Research on the Driven Path of Ambidextrous Innovation of Science and Technology Enterprises: An Exploration Based on Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-13, November.
    2. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    3. Zhang, Xi & Zhu, Qingyuan & Li, Xingchen & Pan, Yinghao, 2023. "The impact of government subsidy on photovoltaic enterprises independent innovation based on the evolutionary game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    4. Nan Xie & Yezi Tong & Haitao He, 2023. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of SME Social Responsibility Performance under Public Health Emergencies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-31, April.
    5. Liang, Xin & Yu, Tao & Hong, Jingke & Shen, Geoffrey Qiping, 2019. "Making incentive policies more effective: An agent-based model for energy-efficiency retrofit in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 177-189.
    6. Li, Na & Zhang, Xianhua, 2025. "Digital empowered business environment and enterprise innovation: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Yuan, Ning & Li, Meijuan, 2024. "Research on collaborative innovation behavior of enterprise innovation ecosystem under evolutionary game," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    3. Insoo Cho & Peter F. Orazem, 2021. "How endogenous risk preferences and sample selection affect analysis of firm survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1309-1332, April.
    4. Tomasz Helbin & Amy Van Looy, 2021. "Is Business Process Management (BPM) Ready for Ambidexterity? Conceptualization, Implementation Guidelines and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Son K. Lam & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Ashish Sharma, 2019. "Salesperson ambidexterity in customer engagement: do customer base characteristics matter?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 659-680, July.
    6. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    7. Alan Hevner & Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau & Jacky Akoka & Nicolas Prat, 2018. "A pragmatic approach for identifying and managing design science research goals and evaluation criteria," Post-Print hal-02283783, HAL.
    8. Felipe A. Csaszar & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2010. "How Much to Copy? Determinants of Effective Imitation Breadth," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 661-676, June.
    9. Bruneel, Johan & Clarysse, Bart & Bobelyn, Annelies & Wright, Mike, 2020. "Liquidity events and VC-backed academic spin-offs: The role of search alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).
    10. Sylvie Héroux & Mélanie Roussy, 2020. "Three cases of compliance with governance regulation: an organizational learning perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(2), pages 449-479, June.
    11. Anne Corcos & Yorgos Rizopoulos, 2011. "Is prosocial behavior egocentric? The “invisible hand” of emotions," Post-Print halshs-01968213, HAL.
    12. Wang, Feng & Chen, Zhiyuan, 2025. "Comparison of county-level rooftop photovoltaic development models in China's electricity spot market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    13. Freeman, Steven F., 1997. "Good decisions : reconciling human rationality, evolution, and ethics," Working papers WP 3962-97., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    14. Zhang, Feng & Jiang, Guohua & Cantwell, John A., 2015. "Subsidiary exploration and the innovative performance of large multinational corporations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 224-234.
    15. Avimanyu Datta, 2016. "Antecedents To Radical Innovations: A Longitudinal Look At Firms In The Information Technology Industry By Aggregation Of Patents," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(07), pages 1-31, October.
    16. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.
    17. Nicolai J. Foss, 1996. "Firms, Incomplete Contracts and Organizational Learning," DRUID Working Papers 96-2, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    18. Deng, Yumiao & Ding, Yongling & Li, Chen & Ma, Sichao, 2025. "Shareholding by industry peers, firm size, and innovation quality," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    19. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    20. Campbell, Robert J. & Short, Cole E. & Graffin, Scott D., 2025. "Balancing the radical and the incremental: CEO affiliative humor and organizational ambidexterity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9217-:d:1773744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.