Author
Listed:
- Jennifer L. Choi
(Department of Economics, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea)
- Jungsuk Kim
(Department of Economics, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea)
Abstract
Climate change has intensified in recent years, with one of its notable consequences being an increased frequency of extreme temperature events—manifesting as both excessively hot and cold days driven by temperature anomalies. In this study, we examine how daily temperature anomalies affect the market valuation of climate-aligned firms in the United States, relative to broader market trends. Using economic valuations of 33 publicly traded U.S. firms associated with renewable energy, electric vehicles, hydrogen fuel, and other sustainability-focused sectors from 2010 to 2024, we assess the effect of temperature anomalies aggregated at the national level, weighted by population, real gross state product, and gross domestic product. Our findings reveal that temperature anomalies—whether unusually warm or cold—are associated with a same-day increase in the financial performance of environmentally friendly firms, followed by a reversal the next day. This short-lived effect is driven primarily by days when temperatures deviate from historical norms but remain within the usual comfort range. When anomalies are large enough to create extreme conditions—pushing already hot days hotter or cold days colder—the pattern reverses: returns decline on the day of the anomaly and rebound the following day. These results are robust to controls for macroeconomic conditions, including the 10-year Treasury–Federal Funds Rate spread, 3-month Treasury–Federal Funds Rate spread, and crude oil prices. Together, the findings highlight the transitory nature of climate-related investor responses and show that market reactions depend on whether temperature shocks merely depart from historical norms or push conditions into genuinely extreme territory.
Suggested Citation
Jennifer L. Choi & Jungsuk Kim, 2025.
"Temperature Anomalies and Green Asset Market Responses,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-17, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8585-:d:1757381
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8585-:d:1757381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.