IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p8077-d1744762.html

Driving Sustainable Mobility: Adoption and the Willingness to Participate in Electric Ride-Hailing Service Among Driver Groups in Less-Developed Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Miao Wang

    (College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Mingyang Du

    (College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Xuefeng Li

    (College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Jingzong Yang

    (School of Big Data, Baoshan University, Baoshan 678000, China)

  • Yuxi Shen

    (Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA)

Abstract

The decarbonization of urban transport is critical for achieving sustainable development goals, and the electrification of ride-hailing services offers one promising pathway. However, the acceptance of electric ride-hailing services (ERHS) in less-developed cities lags behind that in developed regions, and existing research lacks a systematic analysis. This study fills the gap by conducting a survey in Zhangzhou, China, and employing ordered and binary logit models to analyze the factors influencing the acceptance of ERHS and the willingness to participate in this sustainable program by drivers and potential drivers. The findings indicate the following: (1) For drivers, environmental awareness is an important driving factor for accepting ERHS. Drivers who worry about the potential health effects of EV radiation are less willing to adopt ERHS. Part-time drivers and those who receive operational subsidies are more likely to adopt ERHS. (2) Among potential drivers, males, individuals aged 36 to 45, and those who are insensitive to fuel price fluctuations show a lower willingness to adopt ERHS. Conversely, the perceived fairness of the commission rates of the platform, driving range, and driving experience significantly promote the acceptance. (3) For potential drivers, the willingness to participate in ERHS is significantly affected by recycling subsidies, education level, and the currently driven vehicle type. The results could provide a policy blueprint for accelerating the green transformation of the ride-hailing industry, and could also provide policymakers with the empirical evidence needed for differentiated intervention measures to promote sustainable and low-carbon urban transportation.

Suggested Citation

  • Miao Wang & Mingyang Du & Xuefeng Li & Jingzong Yang & Yuxi Shen, 2025. "Driving Sustainable Mobility: Adoption and the Willingness to Participate in Electric Ride-Hailing Service Among Driver Groups in Less-Developed Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-26, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8077-:d:1744762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8077/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8077/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simoiu, Mircea Stefan & Fagarasan, Ioana & Ploix, Stéphane & Calofir, Vasile, 2022. "Modeling the energy community members’ willingness to change their behaviour with multi-agent systems: A stochastic approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1233-1246.
    2. Timmons, D. & Dhunny, A.Z. & Elahee, K. & Havumaki, B. & Howells, M. & Khoodaruth, A. & Lema-Driscoll, A.K. & Lollchund, M.R. & Ramgolam, Y.K. & Rughooputh, S.D.D.V. & Surroop, D., 2019. "Cost minimization for fully renewable electricity systems: A Mauritius case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Sardianou, E. & Genoudi, P., 2013. "Which factors affect the willingness of consumers to adopt renewable energies?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-4.
    4. Qiao, Si & Zhang, Mengzhu & Yeh, Anthony Gar-On, 2023. "Mind the gender gap in ride-hailing from the demand side," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Jiang, Liangyu & Xuan, Ye & Zhang, Kerong, 2025. "Dynamic interaction and evolution analysis of the resource-environment-economy-society complex system in China under the advancement of smart cities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    6. Taiebat, Morteza & Stolper, Samuel & Xu, Ming, 2022. "Widespread range suitability and cost competitiveness of electric vehicles for ride-hailing drivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    7. Zhuge, Chengxiang & Wei, Binru & Shao, Chunfu & Shan, Yuli & Dong, Chunjiao, 2020. "The role of the license plate lottery policy in the adoption of Electric Vehicles: A case study of Beijing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    8. Liu, Qiyang & Lucas, Karen & Marsden, Greg & Liu, Yang, 2019. "Egalitarianism and public perception of social inequities: A case study of Beijing congestion charge," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 47-62.
    9. Huang, Kai & Zhou, Peng & Liu, Zhiyuan & Tang, Tianli & Zhang, Honggang & Jiang, Wei, 2024. "The calculation and distribution of CAV carbon emissions on urban transportation systems: A comparative analysis of renewable and non-renewable energy sources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Degirmenci, Tunahan & Yavuz, Hakan, 2024. "Environmental taxes, R&D expenditures and renewable energy consumption in EU countries: Are fiscal instruments effective in the expansion of clean energy?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    2. Briguglio, Marie & Formosa, Glenn, 2017. "When households go solar: Determinants of uptake of a Photovoltaic Scheme and policy insights," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 154-162.
    3. L. Mundaca & H. Moncreiff, 2021. "New Perspectives on Green Energy Defaults," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 357-383, September.
    4. Lan, Haifeng & Gou, Zhonghua & Yang, Linchuan, 2020. "House price premium associated with residential solar photovoltaics and the effect from feed-in tariffs: A case study of Southport in Queensland, Australia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 907-916.
    5. Eurich, Marina, 2025. "Not in my postcode? Wind turbines and U.S. presidential approval," HWWI Working Paper Series 2/2025, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    6. Baharoon, Dhyia Aidroos & Rahman, Hasimah Abdul & Fadhl, Saeed Obaid, 2016. "Publics׳ knowledge, attitudes and behavioral toward the use of solar energy in Yemen power sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 498-515.
    7. Sward, Jeffrey A. & Nilson, Roberta S. & Katkar, Venktesh V. & Stedman, Richard C. & Kay, David L. & Ifft, Jennifer E. & Zhang, K. Max, 2021. "Integrating social considerations in multicriteria decision analysis for utility-scale solar photovoltaic siting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    8. Akan, Taner & Gündüz, Halil İbrahim & Emirmahmutoğlu, Furkan & Işık, Ali Haydar, 2023. "Disaggregating renewable energy-growth nexus: W-ARDL and W-Toda-Yamamoto approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Constantino Dário Justo & José Eduardo Tafula & Pedro Moura, 2022. "Planning Sustainable Energy Systems in the Southern African Development Community: A Review of Power Systems Planning Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Melita Steenberghe & Aislinn D’hulster & Johannes Weytjens & Marten Ovaere & Koen Schoors, 2025. "Tracking demographic and financial trends in renewable energy cooperative membership in Belgium using survey and bank transaction data," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Prudence Dato, 2018. "Investment in Energy Efficiency, Adoption of Renewable Energy and Household Behavior: Evidence from OECD Countries," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(3), pages 213-244, May.
    12. Yao, Xusheng & Shao, Zhiqi & Wang, Ze & Zhu, Zhu & Chen, Zuanxu & Wu, Qingyang, 2025. "Policy incentives and market mechanisms dual-driven framework for new energy vehicles promotion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Lan, Haifeng & Gou, Zhonghua & Lu, Yi, 2021. "Machine learning approach to understand regional disparity of residential solar adoption in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    14. Szabolcs Nagy & Laszlo Molnar & Noemi Hajdu, 2023. "Understanding the Human Dimensions of the Intention to Use Renewable Energy in Hungary Applying an Extended Model of Theory of Planned Behaviour," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(64), pages 830-830, August.
    15. Serena Y. Kim & Koushik Ganesan & Princess Dickens & Soumya Panda, 2021. "Public Sentiment toward Solar Energy—Opinion Mining of Twitter Using a Transformer-Based Language Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Chaikumbung, Mayula, 2025. "The influence of national cultures on preferences and willingness to pay for renewable energy in Developing countries: A meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    17. He, Pan & Veronesi, Marcella, 2017. "Personality traits and renewable energy technology adoption: A policy case study from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 472-479.
    18. Xu, Weiping & Gu, Tianqi & Chung, Hyungchul & Jiang, Zhuonan & Li, Han & Huang, Kai & Zhu, Wenbo, 2025. "The multimodal dynamics of “ride-pooling” and metro: Spatial-temporal patterns from East Asia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    19. Kamil Lubiński & Magdalena Grębosz-Krawczyk, 2024. "Economical, Innovative, or Ecological? What Are the Green Energy Users?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Xian, Shi & Zhang, Huiying & Wang, Jiamin & Chen, Yu, 2025. "Gender differences in mobility: Exploring the non-linear relationship in multiple contexts using decision tree algorithms," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8077-:d:1744762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.