IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7839-d1738692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Awareness to Action: A UK-Based Study on Public Perceptions of Digital Pollution

Author

Listed:
  • Zohar Barnett-Itzhaki

    (Ruppin Research Group in Environmental and Social Sustainability, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer 4025000, Israel
    Faculty of Engineering, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer 4025000, Israel
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Arava Tsoury

    (Ruppin Research Group in Environmental and Social Sustainability, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer 4025000, Israel
    Faculty of Management & Economics, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer 4025000, Israel
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Digital pollution, encompassing energy consumption, e-waste, and the environmental impact of digital technologies, poses a significant and increasingly pressing environmental challenge that has received insufficient research attention. This study explores public perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors related to digital pollution, focusing on both individuals’ willingness to pay for environmentally friendly digital solutions and their actions to reduce digital environmental impact. Through a comprehensive survey of 300 UK participants, we examined the associations between demographic factors, knowledge levels, perceptions, and environmental actions. While traditional demographic factors such as age and income showed no significant correlation with willingness to pay, we found strong positive correlations with the frequency of environmental consideration (r = 0.47), willingness to act (r = 0.42), and perceived importance of digital pollution (r = 0.40). Notably, knowledge of digital pollution was not correlated with willingness to pay, while self-assessed tech-savviness and environmental knowledge had positive correlations with both willingness to pay and actions taken. Based on a robust cluster analysis, we identified four distinct participant groups: ’Engaged Eco-Tech Enthusiasts’ (youngest, most tech-savvy, and with the highest willingness to act), ‘Knowledgeable Traditionalists’ (oldest, highest knowledge scores, and moderate action), ‘Unengaged Pragmatists’ (lowest engagement), and ‘Affluent Moderates’ (wealthiest and with moderate engagement). These findings provide valuable insights for developing targeted interventions and communication strategies to address this emerging environmental challenge.

Suggested Citation

  • Zohar Barnett-Itzhaki & Arava Tsoury, 2025. "From Awareness to Action: A UK-Based Study on Public Perceptions of Digital Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7839-:d:1738692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7839/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7839/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mira Hajj-Hassan & Rawad Chaker & Anne-Marie Cederqvist, 2024. "Environmental Education: A Systematic Review on the Use of Digital Tools for Fostering Sustainability Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Pothitou, Mary & Hanna, Richard F. & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J., 2016. "Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: An empirical study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1217-1229.
    3. Rita Góralska-Walczak & Ewa Rembiałkowska & Klaudia Kopczyńska & Dominika Średnicka-Tober & Hubert Dobrowolski & Renata Kazimierczak, 2023. "Initial Insight into the Environmental Awareness of Employees in the Catering Sector in the City of Rybnik, Silesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Jelle Boeve-de Pauw & Niklas Gericke & Daniel Olsson & Teresa Berglund, 2015. "The Effectiveness of Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Céline Péréa & Jessica Gérard & Julien de Benedittis, 2023. "Digital sobriety: From awareness of the negative impacts of IT usages to degrowth technology at work," Post-Print emse-04116949, HAL.
    6. Shizheng Tan & Wei Li & Xiaoguang Liu & Chen Liang & Yaqi Wang & Naa Adjeley Sackey, 2025. "Social trust, past behavior, and willingness to pay for environmental protection: evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 20071-20099, August.
    7. Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. & Sinkovics, Rudolf R. & Bohlen, Greg M., 2003. "Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 465-480, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arava Tsoury & Zohar Barnett-Itzhaki, 2025. "Exploring the Associations Between Socioeconomic and Demographic Factors and Literacy in Environmental and Digital Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Sari Verachtert, 2023. "Family congruence in sustainability attitudes and behaviour; an analysis of a household survey in Belgium," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12467-12493, November.
    3. Hassan Harajli & Ali Chalak, 2019. "Willingness to Pay for Energy Efficient Appliances: The Case of Lebanese Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Guomin Li & Wei Li & Zihan Jin & Zhihao Wang, 2019. "Influence of Environmental Concern and Knowledge on Households’ Willingness to Purchase Energy-Efficient Appliances: A Case Study in Shanxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Muhammad Yaseen Bhutto & Xiaohui Liu & Yasir Ali Soomro & Myriam Ertz & Yasser Baeshen, 2020. "Adoption of Energy-Efficient Home Appliances: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Matteo Migheli, 2021. "Green purchasing: the effect of parenthood and gender," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10576-10600, July.
    7. Ming, Yaxin & Deng, Huixin & Wu, Xiaoyue, 2022. "The negative effect of air pollution on people's pro-environmental behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 72-87.
    8. Ishmael Tingbani & Lyton Chithambo & Venancio Tauringana & Nikolaos Papanikolaou, 2020. "Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2194-2210, September.
    9. Zou, Lili Wenli & Chan, Ricky Y.K., 2019. "Why and when do consumers perform green behaviors? An examination of regulatory focus and ethical ideology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 113-127.
    10. Long Niu & Chuntian Lu & Lijuan Fan, 2023. "Social Class and Private-Sphere Green Behavior in China: The Mediating Effects of Perceived Status and Environmental Concern," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Elena Kossmann & Mónica Gómez-Suárez, 2018. "Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 353-370, September.
    12. Chen, Liang & Guo, Yirong, 2023. "The drivers of sustainable development: Natural resources extraction and education for low-middle- and high-income countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    13. Gonçalves, Helena Martins & Lourenço, Tiago Ferreira & Silva, Graça Miranda, 2016. "Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1484-1491.
    14. Ascione, Fabrizio & De Masi, Rosa Francesca & de Rossi, Filippo & Ruggiero, Silvia & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2016. "Optimization of building envelope design for nZEBs in Mediterranean climate: Performance analysis of residential case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 938-957.
    15. Li, Zhengtao & Hu, Bin, 2018. "Perceived health risk, environmental knowledge, and contingent valuation for improving air quality: New evidence from the Jinchuan mining area in China," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 54-68.
    16. Peschel, Anne O. & Grebitus, Carola & Steiner, Bodo & Veeman, Michele, 2015. "A Behavioral Approach to Understanding Green Consumerism Using Latent Class Choice Analysis," 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, March 25-27, 2015, Naples, Italy 202727, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Jianping Huang & Yuheng Tao & Minghong Shi & Jun Wu, 2022. "Empirical Study on Design Trend of Taiwan (1960s–2020): The Evolution of Theme, Diversity and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    18. Galbreath, Jeremy, 2017. "Drivers Of Environmental Sustainability In Wine Firms: The Role And Effect Of Women In Leadership," Working Papers 253851, American Association of Wine Economists.
    19. Eva M. Murgado-Armenteros & María Gutierrez-Salcedo & Francisco José Torres-Ruiz, 2020. "The Concern about Biodiversity as a Criterion for the Classification of the Sustainable Consumer: A Cross-Cultural Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Nhat Minh Tran & Thu Thuy Nguyen & Thi Phuong Linh Nguyen & Anh Trong Vu & Thi Thanh Hoa Phan & Thi Hong Tham Nguyen & Ngoc Diep Do & Anh Tuan Phan, 2022. "Female Managers and Corruption in SMEs: A Comparison Between Family and Nonfamily SMEs in Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7839-:d:1738692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.