IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7754-d1736610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geological Time Perspective and Pro-Environmental Decision-Making: A Structural Equation Model Exploring Temporal Construal Level as a Cognitive Mediator

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Li

    (College of Earth and Planetary Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
    Geological Resources and Geological Engineering Postdoctoral Workstation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Yaming Tian

    (College of Earth and Planetary Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Jie Gan

    (Geological Resources and Geological Engineering Postdoctoral Workstation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
    College of Geophysical, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

Abstract

This study employs a sequential mediation model to investigate the cognitive mechanisms linking Earth science education to sustainable behavior. Grounded in construal level theory and temporal cognition research, we hypothesize that geological time perception mediates the relationship between Earth science education and temporal construal level, which in turn affects sustainable behavior. Structural equation modeling, based on data from 280 participants, validated the proposed model. It confirmed geological time perception as a second-order construct with four dimensions: time span perception, understanding of geological processes, time depth perception, and continuity of geological change. The results indicated significant indirect pathways. Earth science education influenced the temporal construal level via geological time perception (β = 0.325), and the temporal construal level mediated the relationship between geological time perception and sustainable behavior (β = 0.306). The sequential mediation path (β = 0.215) suggests that Earth science education promotes sustainable behavior by recalibrating temporal cognition and construal processes. This finding illuminates how educational interventions can address the temporal asymmetry in environmental decision-making by developing specific cognitive capacities rather than simply imparting knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Li & Yaming Tian & Jie Gan, 2025. "Geological Time Perspective and Pro-Environmental Decision-Making: A Structural Equation Model Exploring Temporal Construal Level as a Cognitive Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7754-:d:1736610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7754/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7754/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grzegorz Maciejewski & Dawid Lesznik, 2022. "Consumers Towards the Goals of Sustainable Development: Attitudes and Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Clara Vasconcelos & Nir Orion, 2021. "Earth Science Education as a Key Component of Education for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Andrew Dobson, 2007. "Environmental citizenship: towards sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 276-285.
    4. Roberts, James A., 1996. "Green Consumers in the 1990s: Profile and Implications for Advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 217-231, July.
    5. Shipp, Abbie J. & Edwards, Jeffrey R. & Lambert, Lisa Schurer, 2009. "Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Chaofan Chen & Qi An & Lijuan Zheng & Chenghua Guan, 2022. "Sustainability Literacy: Assessment of Knowingness, Attitude and Behavior Regarding Sustainable Development among Students in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Boschetti, Fabio & Walker, Iain & Price, Jennifer, 2016. "Modelling and attitudes towards the future," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 322(C), pages 71-81.
    8. Balderjahn, Ingo & Peyer, Mathias & Seegebarth, Barbara & Wiedmann, Klaus-Peter & Weber, Anja, 2018. "The many faces of sustainability-conscious consumers: A category-independent typology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 83-93.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. K. Eastman & P. Modi & S. Gordon-Wilson, 2020. "The Impact of Future Time Perspective and Personality on the Sustainable Behaviours of Seniors," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 275-294, June.
    2. Kristia Kristia & Sándor Kovács & Zoltán Bács & Mohammad Fazle Rabbi, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Food Consumption: Historical Evolution, Dominant Topics and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Friederike Paetz, 2021. "Recommendations for Sustainable Brand Personalities: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Andreas Niedermeier & Agnes Emberger‐Klein & Klaus Menrad, 2021. "Which factors distinguish the different consumer segments of green fast‐moving consumer goods in Germany?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1823-1838, May.
    5. Matteo Migheli, 2021. "Green purchasing: the effect of parenthood and gender," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10576-10600, July.
    6. Yi He & Qimei Chen & Dana L. Alden, 2016. "Time will tell: managing post-purchase changes in brand attitude," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 791-805, November.
    7. Hsu, Chia-Lin & Chang, Chi-Ya & Yansritakul, Chutinart, 2017. "Exploring purchase intention of green skincare products using the theory of planned behavior: Testing the moderating effects of country of origin and price sensitivity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 145-152.
    8. Zou, Lili Wenli & Chan, Ricky Y.K., 2019. "Why and when do consumers perform green behaviors? An examination of regulatory focus and ethical ideology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 113-127.
    9. Sirola, Nina, 2023. "Going beyond the call of duty under conditions of economic threat: Integrating life history and temporal dilemma perspectives," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Niklas Harring & Sverker C. Jagers, 2013. "Should We Trust in Values? Explaining Public Support for Pro-Environmental Taxes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Dong, Xianjing & Zhang, Xiaojuan & Zhang, Congcong & Bi, Chunyu, 2023. "Building sustainability education for green recovery in the energy resource sector: A cross country analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Gonçalves, Helena Martins & Lourenço, Tiago Ferreira & Silva, Graça Miranda, 2016. "Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1484-1491.
    13. Gaston Fornes & Abel Monfort & Camelia Ilie & Chun Kwong (Tony) Koo & Guillermo Cardoza, 2019. "Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability in MBAs. Understanding the Motivations for the Incorporation of ERS in Less Traditional Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Jaiswal, Deepak & Kant, Rishi, 2018. "Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 60-69.
    15. Pakvalit Kurkoon & Daranee Pimchangthong & Veera Boonjing, 2015. "A Conceptual Framework for Individual Green Information Technology Consumption and its Impact," Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM), , vol. 3(3), pages 388-396, July.
    16. Maria Rodrigues & João F. Proença & Rita Macedo, 2023. "Determinants of the Purchase of Secondhand Products: An Approach by the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Nenita B. Nagarit, DBA & Susana C. Bautista, EdD & Ferdinand C. Somido, PhD & Pedrito Jose V. Bermudo, PhD & Antonio D.Yango, PhD & Leomar S. Galicia, PhD, 2018. "Transforming Online Negative Blogs in the Use of Credit Cards in Electronics Transactions into Constructive Action: Basis of Creating Business Spend Analyzer Model," Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM), , vol. 6(1), pages 66-83, January.
    18. Daniel Baier & Theresa Maria Rausch & Timm F. Wagner, 2020. "The Drivers of Sustainable Apparel and Sportswear Consumption: A Segmented Kano Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    19. Jinsoo Hwang & Hyunjoon Kim, 2019. "Consequences of a green image of drone food delivery services: The moderating role of gender and age," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 872-884, July.
    20. Van de Velde, Liesbeth & Verbeke, Wim & Popp, Michael & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2010. "The importance of message framing for providing information about sustainability and environmental aspects of energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5541-5549, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7754-:d:1736610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.