IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7328-d1723845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Process and Mechanisms of Rural Governance Network Transformation: A Case Study of Tianlong Tunpu in Anshun City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Yin

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Xiangqian Chen

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Effective rural governance is essential for fully advancing rural revitalization and achieving sustainable development in rural areas. The construction and operation of rural governance networks are intrinsically tied to governance effectiveness. Focusing on the Tianlong Tunpu community in Guizhou Province, China, this research applies Actor–Network Theory (ANT) to analyze the transformation of rural governance networks. It introduces the “administrative–social–market” threefold empowerment mechanism to explain the underlying mechanism of this process. The findings indicate that the successful construction and operation of a stable rural governance network hinge on the ability of key actors to continuously mobilize administrative, social, and market resources during translation processes, thereby achieving stable “administrative–social–economic” threefold empowerment. This mechanism is dynamic, adapting through reallocation and adjustment to meet the changing realities of rural development. The study also highlights the combined influence of human and non-human actors in the rural governance network. Among non-human factors, Tunpu culture stands out for its cultural and economic value, serving as a shared foundation for collaboration between local governments, rural elites, villagers, and businesses. This cultural element acts as a cornerstone, ensuring the network’s stability and adaptability over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Yin & Xiangqian Chen, 2025. "The Process and Mechanisms of Rural Governance Network Transformation: A Case Study of Tianlong Tunpu in Anshun City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7328-:d:1723845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7328/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7328/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikaela Vasstrøm & Roger Normann, 2019. "The role of local government in rural communities: culture-based development strategies," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 848-868, November.
    2. Niamh Hardiman, 2006. "Politics and Social Partnership - Flexible Network Governance," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 37(3), pages 343-374.
    3. Yanbo Qu & Weiying Zhao & Lijun Zhao & Yanfeng Zheng & Zhiwei Xu & Huailong Jiang, 2022. "Research on Hollow Village Governance Based on Action Network: Mode, Mechanism and Countermeasures—Comparison of Different Patterns in Plain Agricultural Areas of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Yang Yu & Desmond Appiah & Bernard Zulu & Kofi Asamoah Adu-Poku, 2024. "Integrating Rural Development, Education, and Management: Challenges and Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Giuseppe Gargano, 2021. "The Bottom-Up Development Model as a Governance Instrument for the Rural Areas. The Cases of Four Local Action Groups (LAGs) in the United Kingdom and in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-47, August.
    6. Yu Peng & Xiaobing Peng & Xu Li & Mingyue Lu & Mingze Yin, 2023. "Effectiveness in Rural Governance: Influencing Factors and Driving Pathways—Based on 20 Typical Cases of Rural Governance in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Jieming Zhu, 1999. "Local Growth Coalition: The Context and Implications of China’s Gradualist Urban Land Reforms," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 534-548, September.
    8. Kuo-Wei Lin & Kai-Ping Huang, 2014. "Moral judgment and ethical leadership in Chinese management: the role of Confucianism and collectivism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 37-47, January.
    9. Jie Yin & Ju Rui, 2023. "Sustainable Endogenous Development Path Based on Rural Local Elite Governance Model: A Case Study of Xiamen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, May.
    10. Yitian Ren, 2023. "Rural China Staggering towards the Digital Era: Evolution and Restructuring," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, July.
    11. Lujun Lv & Danni Shi, 2023. "Innovative Development and Practice of Digital Rural Governance Model Based on Green Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siu Wai Wong & Bo-sin Tang & Jinlong Liu & Ming Liang & Winky K.O. Ho, 2021. "From “decentralization of governance†to “governance of decentralization†: Reassessing income inequality in periurban China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1473-1489, September.
    2. Ciara Brown & Colin Scott, 2010. "Regulation in Ireland: History, Structure, Style and Reform," Working Papers 201044, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    3. Michael Doherty, 2011. "It must have been love ... but it’s over now: the crisis and collapse of social partnership in Ireland," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(3), pages 371-385, August.
    4. Siyi Chen & Zhigang Chen & Yan Shen, 2021. "Can improving law enforcement effectively curb illegal land use in China?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Lu, Shenghua & Wang, Hui, 2023. "How revolving-door recruitment makes firms stand out in land market: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Hongtao Jia & Lei Zhu & Jing Du, 2022. "Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model of the Farmers’ Sense of Gain in the Provision of Rural Infrastructures: The Case of Tourism-Oriented Rural Areas of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Jingchen You & Zhiqiang Pang & Xijuan Niu & Yize Zhang, 2025. "Measurement of the Modernization of Rural Governance Capacity: A Systematic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-33, August.
    8. Yongshen Liu & Yung Yau, 2020. "Urban Entrepreneurialism Vs Market Society: The Geography of China's Neoliberal Urbanism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 266-288, March.
    9. Yanjun Wang & Yanjun Chen & Wang Zhang & I-Chen Chao & Hang Li, 2024. "The Impact of Rural Tourism on Rural Culture Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Yakut, Aykut Mert & de Bruin, Kelly, 2023. "The importance of having a more realistic welfare transfer determination rule: A CGE analysis for Ireland," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1310-1325.
    11. Somayeh Ahani & Hashem Dadashpoor, 2021. "Urban growth containment policies for the guidance and control of peri-urbanization: a review and proposed framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14215-14244, October.
    12. Xiaqun Liu & Xiaoyue Qiu & Yaming Zhuang, 2025. "Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Rural Revitalization in China: A Perspective on Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Li, Shuqi & Xu, Nuo, 2024. "Fair Competition Review System and cross-regional capital flow: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Hao Chen & Yaying Xu & Evelyn Agba Tackie & Isaac Ahakwa, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Asset-Based Community Development Approach on Rural Poverty Alleviation in Ghana: The Moderating Role of Government Policies," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440231, January.
    15. Danielle Labbé & Clement Musil, 2014. "Periurban Land Redevelopment in Vietnam under Market Socialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(6), pages 1146-1161, May.
    16. Olivier Bargain & Tim Callan & Karina Doorley & Claire Keane, 2017. "Changes in Income Distributions and the Role of Tax‐Benefit Policy During the Great Recession: An International Perspective," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 38, pages 559-585, December.
    17. Yichi Zhang & Kai Xue & Huimin Cao & Yingen Hu, 2023. "The Non-Linear Relationship between the Number of Permanent Residents and the Willingness of Rural Residential Land Transfer: The Threshold Effect of per Capita Net Income," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    18. MacCarthaigh Muiris, 2020. "The role of the ‘centre’ in public service reform," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 68(4), pages 27-40, December.
    19. Monica Elena Crunțeanu & Mircea Comșa & Gina Fîntîneru, 2024. "The Impact of LEADER Funding in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Anne Haila, 2009. "Chinese Alternatives," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 572-575, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7328-:d:1723845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.