IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p5831-d813347.html

Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model of the Farmers’ Sense of Gain in the Provision of Rural Infrastructures: The Case of Tourism-Oriented Rural Areas of China

Author

Listed:
  • Hongtao Jia

    (Department of Construction and Real Estate, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, 2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Lei Zhu

    (Department of Construction and Real Estate, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, 2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Jing Du

    (Department of Construction and Real Estate, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, 2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, China)

Abstract

During the rapid development of rural infrastructures in China, many important issues such as the real wishes of farmers and the proper management of the infrastructure have been overlooked, resulting in a weak sense of gain among farmers. To propose effective improvement strategies, this research aimed to explore the influence mechanism of the farmers’ sense of gain and to build a comprehensive evaluation model of farmers’ sense of gain in the provision of rural infrastructure. To achieve the above aims, we first proposed hypotheses among four constructs and selected an evaluation index for each construct. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and a questionnaire survey, we then verified the proposed hypotheses and developed a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of the farmers’ sense of gain in the provision of rural infrastructure. The results first showed that the content of gain and the way of gain directly affect the farmers’ sense of gain, and the governance indirectly affects the farmers’ sense of gain. Moreover, the way of gain has the greatest impact on the sense of gain, followed by the governance and the content of gain. Furthermore, the analysis results demonstrate that the developed fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model is feasible and effective in evaluating farmers’ sense of gain in the provision of rural infrastructures. The findings of this study first enrich the relevant theories of farmers’ sense of gain in the provision of rural infrastructure. The findings also provide theoretical support for the government authorities to put forward effective governance strategies for rural infrastructure from the perspective of farmers’ sense of gain.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongtao Jia & Lei Zhu & Jing Du, 2022. "Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model of the Farmers’ Sense of Gain in the Provision of Rural Infrastructures: The Case of Tourism-Oriented Rural Areas of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5831-:d:813347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5831/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5831/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikaela Vasstrøm & Roger Normann, 2019. "The role of local government in rural communities: culture-based development strategies," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 848-868, November.
    2. Julia Kowalewski, 2011. "Specialization and employment development in Germany: An analysis at the regional level," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(4), pages 789-811, November.
    3. Li Gong & Chunling Jin, 2009. "Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation for Carrying Capacity of Regional Water Resources," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(12), pages 2505-2513, September.
    4. J. Ott, 2011. "Government and Happiness in 130 Nations: Good Governance Fosters Higher Level and More Equality of Happiness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 3-22, May.
    5. Marta Orviska & Anetta Caplanova & John Hudson, 2014. "The Impact of Democracy on Well-being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 493-508, January.
    6. Paul Selman, 2004. "Community participation in the planning and management of cultural landscapes," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 365-392.
    7. Małgorzata E. Górnik-Durose, 2020. "Materialism and Well-Being Revisited: The Impact of Personality," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 305-326, January.
    8. Ethan McMahan & David Estes, 2011. "Measuring Lay Conceptions of Well-Being: The Beliefs About Well-Being Scale," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 267-287, April.
    9. Chao Wei & Zuo Zhang & Sheng Ye & Mengxi Hong & Wenwen Wang, 2021. "Spatial-Temporal Divergence and Driving Mechanisms of Urban-Rural Sustainable Development: An Empirical Study Based on Provincial Panel Data in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fang Dong & Jiyao Yin & Jirubin Xiang & Zhangyu Chang & Tiantian Gu & Feihu Han, 2023. "EWM-FCE-ODM-Based Evaluation of Smart Community Construction: From the Perspective of Residents’ Sense of Gain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Dezhi Li & Wentao Wang & Guanying Huang & Shenghua Zhou & Shiyao Zhu & Haibo Feng, 2023. "How to Enhance Citizens’ Sense of Gain in Smart Cities? A SWOT-AHP-TOWS Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 787-820, February.
    3. Wang, Zhaolin & Wang, Yingying & Bi, Guohua, 2025. "How does the three rights separation of rural homestead (TRSRH) impact farmers’ sense of gain: Evidence from typical pilot areas for rural homestead reform in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Xiong Wang & Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Pengyu Yan, 2025. "A multi-objective optimization approach for integrated risk-based internal audit planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(2), pages 1811-1840, March.
    5. Lei Zhu & Hui Xiong & Yan Ning & Miaomiao Lv, 2023. "Addressing Individual Perception: Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to the Interim Payment Method in Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Puiu Nistoreanu & Alina-Cerasela Aluculesei & George-Cornel Dumitrescu, 2024. "A Bibliometric Study of the Importance of Tourism in Salt Landscapes for the Sustainable Development of Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Puwei Zhang & Li Wu & Rui Li, 2023. "Development Drivers of Rural Summer Health Tourism for the Urban Elderly: A Demand- and Supply-Based Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Ting Shao & Peiting Yang & Hongbo Jiang & Qigan Shao, 2023. "An Analysis of Public Service Satisfaction of Tourists at Scenic Spots: The Case of Xiamen City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Runqiu Tu & Ajun Wan & Hongling Chen & Yixuan Liu & Xiaolei Qi, 2026. "Rural landscape comprehensive evaluation system and case study based on environmental value-added," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 1181-1200, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesús Peiró-Palomino & Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo, 2018. "Assessing well-being in European regions. Does government quality matter?," Working Papers 2018/06, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    2. João Leitão & Helena Alves & Dina Pereira, 2016. "Open innovative governance, transparency and citizens´ quality of life: An application to Portuguese municipalities," Working Papers. Collection B: Regional and sectoral economics 1606, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.
    3. Gabriele Prati, 2023. "The Relationship Between Democracy and Subjective Well-Being as a Function of Anti-Democratic Attitudes: a Multilevel Analysis of 78 Countries Worldwide," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(5), pages 2605-2618, October.
    4. Mengting Liu & Yueqing Ji, 2020. "Determinants of Agricultural Infrastructure Construction in China: Based on the “Participation of Beneficiary Groups” Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Pilar Campoy-Muñoz & Manuel Alejandro Cardenete & M. Carmen Delgado, 2015. "Employment trends in the key sectors of the Andalusian economy," ERSA conference papers ersa15p91, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Luis Miguel Moctezuma Teresa & José Luis Aparicio López & Columba Rodríguez Alviso & Herlinda Gervacio Jiménez & Rosa María Brito Carmona, 2022. "Environmental Competencies for Sustainability: A Training Experience with High School Teachers in a Rural Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Kowalewski, Julia, 2012. "Inter-industrial relations and sectoral employment development in German regions," HWWI Research Papers 127, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    8. O'Donnell, Gus & Oswald, Andrew J., 2015. "National well-being policy and a weighted approach to human feelings," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 59-70.
    9. Donghyun Kim & Up Lim, 2016. "Urban Resilience in Climate Change Adaptation: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Andreas T. Schmidt & Daan Juijn, 2024. "Economic inequality and the long-term future," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 23(1), pages 67-99, February.
    11. Ayça Soygür & Naciye Doratlı, 2025. "Rethinking Local Development in Small-Scale Mediterranean Cities: Challenges, Gaps and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-28, September.
    12. Badunenko, Oleg & Cordero, Jose M. & Kumbhakar, Subal C., 2021. "Are you slacking? Where do you and your country stand in the happiness pursuit?," MPRA Paper 108316, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Weilun Feng & Yurui Li, 2021. "Measuring the Ecological Safety Effects of Land Use Transitions Promoted by Land Consolidation Projects: The Case of Yan’an City on the Loess Plateau of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Yanjun Wang & Yanjun Chen & Wang Zhang & I-Chen Chao & Hang Li, 2024. "The Impact of Rural Tourism on Rural Culture Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Yew-Kwang Ng, 2011. "Happiness Is Absolute, Universal, Ultimate, Unidimensional, Cardinally Measurable and Interpersonally Comparable: A Basis for the Environmentally Responsible Happy Nation Index," Monash Economics Working Papers 16-11, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    16. Bodo Knoll & Hans Pitlik, 2014. "Who Benefits from Big Government? A Life Satisfaction Approach. WWWforEurope Policy Paper No. 14," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47495.
    17. Hao Chen & Yaying Xu & Evelyn Agba Tackie & Isaac Ahakwa, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Asset-Based Community Development Approach on Rural Poverty Alleviation in Ghana: The Moderating Role of Government Policies," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440231, January.
    18. Henri Njangang, 2019. "Governance and Happiness in African countries," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(2), pages 1546-1555.
    19. Hoolda Kim & Baeyong Lee, 2026. "Exploring the Determinants of Subjective Well-Being in Older Adults: A Cross-National Analysis of Social, Political, Economic, and Demographic Factors," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 1-35, February.
    20. Antonio Santoro & Martina Venturi & Mauro Agnoletti, 2021. "Landscape Perception and Public Participation for the Conservation and Valorization of Cultural Landscapes: The Case of the Cinque Terre and Porto Venere UNESCO Site," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5831-:d:813347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.