IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v155y2025ics0264837725001255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does the three rights separation of rural homestead (TRSRH) impact farmers’ sense of gain: Evidence from typical pilot areas for rural homestead reform in China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zhaolin
  • Wang, Yingying
  • Bi, Guohua

Abstract

The three rights separation of rural homestead (TRSRH) in China represents a pivotal policy innovation aimed at facilitating the transfer of rural homesteads and fostering their efficient utilization. Here, we developed a conceptual framework and combined empirical investigation from China’s 10 pilot areas for rural homestead reform, using the Coupling Coordination Degree Model (CCDM) and Propensity Score Matching-Difference in Differences (PSM-DID) to examine how the implementation of the TRSRH impacts the farmers’ senses of gain. Our findings uncover that: i) The TRSRH significantly improves farmers’ senses of gain and the Coupling Coordination Degree (CCD) of their senses of gain, this conclusion is still valid after a variety of robustness tests. ii) The impacts of the TRSRH on farmers’ multidimensional senses of gain exhibit significant differences. The policy has the strongest influence on their sense of economic gain and social security gain, followed by sense of social relationship gain, while its impact on their sense of production and life gain was comparatively weak. iii) The impacts of the TRSRH on the farmers’ sense of gain varies across locations. The most significant effects are observed in outer suburbs villages, while the impacts are weaker in suburban and remote villages. Additionally, the TRSRH might lead to farmers’ non-comprehensive development and exacerbate rural development imbalance across different locational villages. The findings can provide valuable insights for the formulation of the rural homestead reform policies in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zhaolin & Wang, Yingying & Bi, Guohua, 2025. "How does the three rights separation of rural homestead (TRSRH) impact farmers’ sense of gain: Evidence from typical pilot areas for rural homestead reform in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:155:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725001255
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725001255
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107591?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:155:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725001255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.