IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6970-d1714596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of Optimistic Green R&D in a Sustainable Supply Chain with Information Asymmetry

Author

Listed:
  • Shengzhong Huang

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yifeng Lei

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hongyong Fu

    (Research Center of Supply Chain Compliance Management, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)

Abstract

With consumers increasing in environmental awareness, manufacturers have integrated green R&D into their strategies, aiming to grasp the green market. However, manufacturers may be too bullish on the market potential of green products and maintain an optimistic attitude toward green R&D. Despite having an optimistic attitude, manufacturers often have no demand information advantage over downstream retailers due to their position in the supply chain, away from the market. It is worth exploring what impact optimistic green R&D in a sustainable supply chain with demand information asymmetry will have. Previous studies have not managed to reveal this. In this study, a stylized model is introduced to explore this question. The main findings are as follows: (1) optimistic green R&D increases the feasibility of the retailer sharing demand information, which facilitates information communication in the sustainable supply chain; (2) in most cases, optimistic green R&D does not bring higher profits for the manufacturer, yet is likely to allow the retailer to earn more, thereby resulting in a loss–win outcome; and (3) depending on the green R&D efficiency of the manufacturer and the consumer’s environmental awareness, optimistic green R&D may not generate higher environmental benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengzhong Huang & Yifeng Lei & Hongyong Fu, 2025. "Impacts of Optimistic Green R&D in a Sustainable Supply Chain with Information Asymmetry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-26, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6970-:d:1714596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6970/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6970/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin, Minyue & Zhang, Xueqing & Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu, 2021. "Implications of green optimism upon sustainable supply chain management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 131-139.
    2. Zhang, Shuguang & Dan, Bin & Zhou, Maosen, 2019. "After-sale service deployment and information sharing in a supply chain under demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 351-363.
    3. Simon, Mark & Shrader, Rodney C., 2012. "Entrepreneurial actions and optimistic overconfidence: The role of motivated reasoning in new product introductions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 291-309.
    4. Baozhuang Niu & Zifan Shen & Qiyang Li, 2023. "Information advantage and payment disadvantage when selling goods through a powerful retailer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 331(1), pages 417-446, December.
    5. Chen, Jen-Yi & Dimitrov, Stanko & Pun, Hubert, 2019. "The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 42-58.
    6. Baojun Jiang & Chang Liu, 2019. "Managerial Optimism in a Competitive Market," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 833-846, April.
    7. Panda, Shibaji, 2014. "Coordination of a socially responsible supply chain using revenue sharing contract," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 92-104.
    8. Hua, Jiawen & Lin, Jun & Wang, Kai & Liu, Guoquan, 2023. "Government interventions in new technology adoption to improve product greenness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    9. Kartick Dey & Sankhadip Roy & Subrata Saha, 2019. "The impact of strategic inventory and procurement strategies on green product design in a two-period supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 1915-1948, April.
    10. Yang Song & Tijun Fan & Yuewu Tang & Fengli Zou, 2021. "Quality information acquisition and ordering decisions with risk aversion," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(22), pages 6864-6880, November.
    11. Yanli Tang & Suresh P. Sethi & Yulan Wang, 2023. "Games of supplier encroachment channel selection and e‐tailer's information sharing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(11), pages 3650-3664, November.
    12. Yunjie Wang & Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong, 2022. "Sharing Manufacturer’s Demand Information in a Supply Chain with Price and Service Effort Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 1698-1713, May.
    13. Yanjie Wang & Qinpeng Wang & Jingao Shi, 2024. "Demand Forecast Information Sharing in Low-Carbon Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Mengfan & Hong, Zhaofu & Guo, Xiaolong & Yu, Yugang, 2025. "Green design and information sharing in a horizontally competitive supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Yong Liu & Wenwen Ren & Qian Xu & Zhi-yang Liu, 2022. "Decision analysis of supply chains considering corporate social responsibility and government subsidy under different channel power structures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1841-1869, August.
    3. Kopel, Michael & Ramani, Vinay, 2024. "The bright side of the planning fallacy in distribution channels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 540-551.
    4. Li Liu & Zhe Wang & Jiangtao Xu & Zaisheng Zhang, 2023. "Green baton: how government interventions advance green technological innovation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11121-11152, October.
    5. Yong Ma & Chunyu Li, 2023. "Optimal Strategies of Customization and Information Sharing in the Presence of Feature Creep," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-29, May.
    6. Feng, Lipan & Jin, Minyue, 2022. "Platform vs. Manufacturer: Who should implement innovation in e-commerce supply chains?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    7. Wang, Min & Huang, Hongfu & Liu, Feng, 2023. "To adapt or to standardize? Cross-market green product design under parallel importation impact," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    8. Sani Majumder & Izabela Nielsen & Susanta Maity & Subrata Saha, 2022. "Effect of Product Distribution Structures and Government Subsidy Measures on Product Quality and Consumption under Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    9. Jin, Wei & Yang, Jun & Wang, Chengfu, 2024. "Cost subsidy or environmental regulation? The effects of government interventions on environmental quality and 3BL performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    10. Zhang, Ting & Su, Yina & Wang, Ningning, 2023. "Product quality improvement under retailer-direct financing: Effects of attitudes toward extreme weather," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    11. Xia, Jing & Niu, Wenju, 2021. "Carbon-reducing contract design for a supply chain with environmental responsibility under asymmetric information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Bertini, Marco & Halbheer, Daniel & Koenigsberg, Oded, 2020. "Price and quality decisions by self-serving managers," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 236-257.
    13. Fakheri, Sajjad & Bahrami-Bidoni, Zeynab & Makui, Ahmad & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto DR., 2022. "A sustainable competitive supply chain network design for a green product under uncertainty: A case study of Iranian leather industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    14. Chen, Zhenjiang & Dan, Bin & Lei, Ting & Ma, Songxuan, 2025. "Demand information disclosure in fresh produce supply chain considering competition between geographical indication and local suppliers," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bosung, 2024. "Is green optimism good for the environment but bad for firms?—A study on green optimism in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Wenqian Zhang & Haiyan Wang, 2023. "Optimal contract design for live streaming platforms under dual asymmetric information considering corporate social responsibility," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 3537-3555, September.
    17. Jin, Minyue & Zhang, Xueqing & Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu, 2021. "Implications of green optimism upon sustainable supply chain management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 131-139.
    18. Liang, Yuting & Zhang, Qingyu, 2025. "ESG equity or green credit: Financing strategies for green transformation in the supply chain under consumption subsidies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    19. Guo, Xiaolong & Su, Zenghui & Zhou, Fangkezi, 2025. "Supplier encroachment with decision biases," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(1), pages 129-141.
    20. Chang, Shuhua & Li, Jiajing & Sethi, Suresh P. & Wang, Xinyu, 2024. "Risk hedging for VaR-constrained newsvendors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6970-:d:1714596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.