IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6857-d1711814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thinking Green: A Place Lab Approach to Citizen Engagement and Indicators for Nature-Based Solutions in a Case Study from Katowice

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Samborska-Goik

    (Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, 40-844 Katowice, Poland)

  • Anna Starzewska-Sikorska

    (Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, 40-844 Katowice, Poland)

  • Patrycja Obłój

    (Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, 40-844 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

Urban areas are at the forefront in addressing global challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss. Among the key responses are nature-based solutions, which are increasingly being integrated into policy frameworks but which require strong community engagement for their effective implementation. This paper presents the findings of surveys conducted within the Place Lab in Katowice, Poland, an initiative developed as part of an international project and used as a participatory tool for co-creating and implementing green infrastructure. The project applies both place-based and people-centred approaches to support European cities in their transition towards regenerative urbanism. Place Lab activities encourage collaboration between local authorities and residents, enhancing awareness and fostering participation in environmental initiatives. The survey data collected during the project allowed for the evaluation of changes in public attitudes and levels of engagement and for the identification of broader societal phenomena that may influence the implementation of nature-based solutions. The findings revealed, for instance, that more women were interested in supporting the project, that residents tended to be sceptical of governmental actions on climate change, and that views were divided on the trade-off between urban infrastructure such as parking and roads and the presence of green areas. Furthermore, questions of responsibility, awareness, and long-term commitment were frequently raised. Building on the survey results and the existing literature, the study proposes a set of indicators to assess the contribution of citizen participation to the adoption of nature-based solutions. While the effectiveness of nature-based solutions in mitigating climate change impacts can be assessed relatively directly, evaluating civic engagement is more complex. Nevertheless, when conducted transparently and interpreted by experts, indicator-based assessment can offer valuable insights. This study introduces a novel perspective by considering not only drivers of engagement but also the obstacles. The proposed indicators provide a foundation for evaluating community readiness and commitment to nature-based approaches and may be adapted for application in other urban settings and in future research on climate resilience strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Samborska-Goik & Anna Starzewska-Sikorska & Patrycja Obłój, 2025. "Thinking Green: A Place Lab Approach to Citizen Engagement and Indicators for Nature-Based Solutions in a Case Study from Katowice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-38, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6857-:d:1711814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6857/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6857/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mihaela Constantinescu & Andreea Orîndaru & Ștefan-Claudiu Căescu & Andreea Pachițanu, 2019. "Sustainable Development of Urban Green Areas for Quality of Life Improvement—Argument for Increased Citizen Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Haneen Ahmad & Yuxin Cao & Ayat Almomani & Lama Akmeel & Lijun Wang, 2025. "Exploring Safety Perceptions Among Women Using Factor and Cluster Analysis: A Case Study of Neighborhood Parks in Jordan," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Alina Pancewicz & Wiktoria Anczykowska & Natalia Żak, 2023. "Climate change adaptation activities planning and implementation in large cities: results of research carried out in Poland and selected European cities," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(8), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Ben Harman & Anne Leitch & Darryl Low Choy, 2015. "Public engagement and climate adaptation: insights from three local governments in Australia," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(7), pages 1196-1216, July.
    5. Davies, Clive & Lafortezza, Raffaele, 2019. "Transitional path to the adoption of nature-based solutions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 406-409.
    6. Hai-Ying Liu & Marion Jay & Xianwen Chen, 2021. "The Role of Nature-Based Solutions for Improving Environmental Quality, Health and Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-56, October.
    7. Nancy Andrea Ramírez-Agudelo & Roger Porcar Anento & Miriam Villares & Elisabet Roca, 2020. "Nature-Based Solutions for Water Management in Peri-Urban Areas: Barriers and Lessons Learned from Implementation Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-36, November.
    8. Giachino, Chiara & Pattanaro, Giulio & Bertoldi, Bernardo & Bollani, Luigi & Bonadonna, Alessandro, 2021. "Nature-based solutions and their potential to attract the young generations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Federico Caprotti, 2018. "Future cities: moving from technical to human needs," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-4, December.
    10. C. Wamsler & J. Alkan-Olsson & H. Björn & H. Falck & H. Hanson & T. Oskarsson & E. Simonsson & F. Zelmerlow, 2020. "Beyond participation: when citizen engagement leads to undesirable outcomes for nature-based solutions and climate change adaptation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 235-254, January.
    11. Bridget Thodesen & Berit Time & Tore Kvande, 2022. "Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems: Themes of Public Perception—A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 109-123, February.
    13. Denis Michalina & Peter Mederly & Hans Diefenbacher & Benjamin Held, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Development: A Review of Urban Sustainability Indicator Frameworks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Rodolfo Sapiains & Gabriela Azócar & Pilar Moraga & Catalina Valenzuela & Paulina Aldunce & Camilo Cornejo & Maisa Rojas & Antonio Pulgar & Loreto Medina & Deniz Bozkurt, 2022. "Are Citizens Ready for Active Climate Engagement or Stuck in a Game of Blame? Local Perceptions of Climate Action and Citizen Participation in Chilean Patagonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Vera Ferreira & Ana Paula Barreira & Luís Loures & Dulce Antunes & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Engagement on Nature-Based Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, January.
    16. Viniece Jennings & Omoshalewa Bamkole, 2019. "The Relationship between Social Cohesion and Urban Green Space: An Avenue for Health Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Moreno-Monroy, Ana I. & Schiavina, Marcello & Veneri, Paolo, 2021. "Metropolitan areas in the world. Delineation and population trends," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    18. Jarosław Kulpa & Paweł Kamiński & Kinga Stecuła & Dariusz Prostański & Piotr Matusiak & Daniel Kowol & Michał Kopacz & Piotr Olczak, 2021. "Technical and Economic Aspects of Electric Energy Storage in a Mine Shaft—Budryk Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Akira S. Mori & Laura E. Dee & Andrew Gonzalez & Haruka Ohashi & Jane Cowles & Alexandra J. Wright & Michel Loreau & Yann Hautier & Tim Newbold & Peter B. Reich & Tetsuya Matsui & Wataru Takeuchi & Ke, 2021. "Biodiversity–productivity relationships are key to nature-based climate solutions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(6), pages 543-550, June.
    20. Dijkstra, Lewis & Florczyk, Aneta J. & Freire, Sergio & Kemper, Thomas & Melchiorri, Michele & Pesaresi, Martino & Schiavina, Marcello, 2021. "Applying the Degree of Urbanisation to the globe: A new harmonised definition reveals a different picture of global urbanisation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    21. Sverker C. Jagers & Simon Matti, 2010. "Ecological Citizens: Identifying Values and Beliefs that Support Individual Environmental Responsibility among Swedes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-25, April.
    22. Monika Janiszek & Robert Krzysztofik, 2023. "Green Infrastructure as an Effective Tool for Urban Adaptation—Solutions from a Big City in a Postindustrial Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lei Li & Ali Cheshmehzangi & Faith Ka Shun Chan & Christopher D. Ives, 2021. "Mapping the Research Landscape of Nature-Based Solutions in Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-41, April.
    2. Maria Stella Righettini, 2021. "Framing Sustainability. Evidence from Participatory Forums to Taylor the Regional 2030 Agenda to Local Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Rosenthal, Stuart S. & Strange, William C., 2024. "JUE 2007–2023: Rising impact," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Soini, Katriina & Anderson, Carl Cyrus & Polderman, Annemarie & Teresa, Carlone & Sisay, Debele & Kumar, Prashant & Mannocchi, Matteo & Mickovski, Slobodan & Panga, Depy & Pilla, Francesco & Preuschma, 2023. "Context matters: Co-creating nature-based solutions in rural living labs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Bianka Plüschke-Altof & Bradley Loewen & Camilo Calderon & Mariia Chebotareva & Reeda Tuula-Fjodorov & Julia Gäckle, 2025. "Nature-Based Solutions and Public Participation: Unpacking Tensions in Sustainable City Development in Northern Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Shohei Nakamura & Pierre-Philippe Combes & Robin Moellerherm & Charlotte Robert & Mark Roberts & Benjamin Stewart & Slava Yakubenko, 2023. "Where Is Poverty Concentrated? New Evidence Based on Internationally Consistent Urban and Poverty Measurements," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-04345458, HAL.
    7. Xiaoping Zhou & Duanshuai Shen & Xiaokun Gu, 2022. "Influences of Land Policy on Urban Ecological Corridors Governance: A Case Study from Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Céline Van Migerode & Ate Poorthuis & Ben Derudder, 2024. "Flexurba: An open-source R package to flexibly reconstruct the Degree of Urbanisation classification," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1706-1714, September.
    9. Nadirah Hazwani Najib & Syuhaida Ismail & Rohayah Che Amat & Serdar Durdyev & Zdeňka Konečná & Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh Chofreh & Feybi Ariani Goni & Chitdrakantan Subramaniam & Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, 2022. "Stakeholders’ Impact Factors of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Sustainable Mixed Development Projects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Ilse M. Voskamp & Claudia de Luca & Monserrat Budding Polo-Ballinas & Helena Hulsman & Reinder Brolsma, 2021. "Nature-Based Solutions Tools for Planning Urban Climate Adaptation: State of the Art," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    12. Marius Băban & Călin Florin Băban & Tudor Mitran, 2023. "Universities as an External Knowledge Source for Industry: Investigating the Antecedents’ Impact on the Importance Perception of Their Collaboration in Open Innovation Using an Ordinal Regression-Neur," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Edurne Magro Montero & Mari Jose Aranguren & Mikel Navarro, 2011. "Smart Specialisation Strategies: The Case of the Basque Country," Working Papers 2011R07, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
    14. Constantinos A. Balaras & Andreas I. Theodoropoulos & Elena G. Dascalaki, 2023. "Geographic Information Systems for Facilitating Audits of the Urban Built Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, May.
    15. Agnieszka Kuś & Dorota Grego-Planer, 2021. "A Model of Innovation Activity in Small Enterprises in the Context of Selected Financial Factors: The Example of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Reis, Anabela & Heitor, Manuel & Amaral, Miguel & Mendonça, Joana, 2016. "Revisiting industrial policy: Lessons learned from the establishment of an automotive OEM in Portugal," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 195-205.
    17. Roberto Iorio & Sandrine Labory & Francesco Rentocchini, 2014. "Academics’ Motivations and Depth and Breadth of Knowledge Transfer Activities," Working Papers 1401, c.MET-05 - Centro Interuniversitario di Economia Applicata alle Politiche per L'industria, lo Sviluppo locale e l'Internazionalizzazione.
    18. Su, Hsin-Ning & Moaniba, Igam M., 2017. "Investigating the dynamics of interdisciplinary evolution in technology developments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 12-23.
    19. Filippova, Irina & Unknown, Unknown, 2013. "Кластерные Стратегии И Кластерные Инициативы: Перспективы И Факторы Эффективной Кластеризации [Cluster strategy and cluster initiatives: prospects and factors of effective clustering]," MPRA Paper 49949, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Petersen, Alexander M. & Rotolo, Daniele & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2016. "A triple helix model of medical innovation: Supply, demand, and technological capabilities in terms of Medical Subject Headings," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 666-681.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6857-:d:1711814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.