Author
Listed:
- Bianka Plüschke-Altof
(School of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia
Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 51003 Tartu, Estonia)
- Bradley Loewen
(Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7049 Trondheim, Norway
School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, 51009 Tartu, Estonia)
- Camilo Calderon
(Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden)
- Mariia Chebotareva
(School of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia
School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, 51009 Tartu, Estonia)
- Reeda Tuula-Fjodorov
(School of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia)
- Julia Gäckle
(Institute of Landscape Architecture, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany)
Abstract
Securing the acceptance of nature-based solutions (NbS) in urban greening is central for addressing current social, environmental, and climate-related challenges. To achieve this, participatory planning processes are increasingly encouraged in NbS projects. However, challenges often arise, as NbS and public participation are not always seamlessly compatible. Based on a cross-case, qualitative content analysis of project organizers’ experiences in seven urban NbS planning projects in Northern Europe, we unpack three social tensions that can limit the role of participatory NbS: (1) tensions between the openness or “closedness” of environmental and participatory objectives; (2) tensions between the increasing time demands for participatory NbS processes and limitations for largely project-based NbS delivery; and (3) tensions between the roles of expert and lay knowledge. We illustrate these tensions through our cases, showing the challenges that they create for project organizers, both in terms of implementing NbS projects, as well as the risks that they have for broader NbS and participatory goals. We use the experiences and learnings from our cases to suggest paths that can help planners balance these tensions and potentially lead to more inclusive and transformative NbS planning models.
Suggested Citation
Bianka Plüschke-Altof & Bradley Loewen & Camilo Calderon & Mariia Chebotareva & Reeda Tuula-Fjodorov & Julia Gäckle, 2025.
"Nature-Based Solutions and Public Participation: Unpacking Tensions in Sustainable City Development in Northern Europe,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1649-:d:1725149
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1649-:d:1725149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.