IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6181-d1695495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Hydrogen Supply Chain Decision-Making and Contract Optimization Under Uncertainty: A Pessimistic-Based Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Hou

    (School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China
    Inner Mongolia Modern Logistics and Supply Chain Management Research Center, Hohhot 010051, China)

  • Chong Xu

    (School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China
    Inner Mongolia Modern Logistics and Supply Chain Management Research Center, Hohhot 010051, China)

  • Junhua Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China
    Inner Mongolia Modern Logistics and Supply Chain Management Research Center, Hohhot 010051, China)

  • Zongchuan Wen

    (School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China)

Abstract

To address the issue of excessive pessimism caused by demand and supply uncertainties in the green hydrogen supply chain, this study develops a two-tier green hydrogen supply chain model comprising upstream hydrogen production stations and downstream hydrogen refueling stations. This research work investigates optimal ordering and production strategies under stochastic demand and supply conditions. Additionally, option contracts are introduced to share the risks associated with the stochastic output of green hydrogen. This study shows the following: (1) Under decentralized decision-making, the optimal ordering quantity when the hydrogen refueling station is excessively pessimistic is not necessarily lower than the optimal ordering quantity when it is in a rational state, and hydrogen production stations will only operate when the degree of excessive pessimism is relatively low. (2) The initial option ordering quantity is always larger than the minimum execution quantity under the option contract; higher first-order option prices and lower second-order option prices can help to increase the initial option ordering quantity. (3) The option contract is effective in circumventing the negative impact of excessive pessimism at hydrogen production stations on planned production quantities. This study addresses the gap in the existing research regarding excessively pessimistic behaviors and the application of option contracts within the green hydrogen supply chain, providing both theoretical insights and practical guidance for decision-making optimization. This advancement further promotes the sustainable development of the green hydrogen industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Hou & Chong Xu & Junhua Liu & Zongchuan Wen, 2025. "Green Hydrogen Supply Chain Decision-Making and Contract Optimization Under Uncertainty: A Pessimistic-Based Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-32, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6181-:d:1695495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6181/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6181/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hu, Benyong & Qu, Jiali & Meng, Chao, 2018. "Supply chain coordination under option contracts with joint pricing under price-dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 74-86.
    2. Webb, Jeremy & Longden, Thomas & Boulaire, Fanny & Gono, Marcel & Wilson, Clevo, 2023. "The application of green finance to the production of blue and green hydrogen: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    3. Rui Song & Zhongming Wu, 2023. "Centralized Decision Making in an Omnichannel Supply Chain with Stochastic Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Du, Xianjin & Zhan, Huimin & Zhu, Xiaoxuan & He, Xiuli, 2021. "The upstream innovation with an overconfident manufacturer in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Zare, Marjan & Esmaeili, Maryam & He, Yuanjie, 2019. "Implications of risk-sharing strategies on supply chains with multiple retailers and under random yield," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 413-424.
    6. Alexandrou, Stathis & Khatiwada, Dilip, 2025. "Strategies for decarbonizing the aviation sector: Evaluating economic competitiveness of green hydrogen value chains - A case study in France," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    7. Hosoda, Takamichi & Disney, Stephen M. & Gavirneni, Srinagesh, 2015. "The impact of information sharing, random yield, correlation, and lead times in closed loop supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 827-836.
    8. Kebing Chen & Tiaojun Xiao, 2015. "Production planning and backup sourcing strategy of a buyer-dominant supply chain with random yield and demand," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(15), pages 2799-2817, November.
    9. Ayiguzhali Tuluhong & Qingpu Chang & Lirong Xie & Zhisen Xu & Tengfei Song, 2024. "Current Status of Green Hydrogen Production Technology: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-47, October.
    10. Wang, Lingling & Wu, Yong & Hu, Shengqiang, 2021. "Make-to-order supply chain coordination through option contract with random yields and overconfidence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    11. Zhao, Yingxue & Ma, Lijun & Xie, Gang & Cheng, T.C.E., 2013. "Coordination of supply chains with bidirectional option contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 375-381.
    12. Jialu Li, 2025. "Demand Forecast Investment by Overconfident Retailer in Supply Chains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Wei Lu & Yu Jiang & Panpan Xia & Zhimin Huang, 2023. "How retailer overconfidence affects supply chain transparency with manufacturer encroachment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 329(1), pages 1149-1174, October.
    14. Lei Yang & Shuning Wang & Zhihu Zhang & Kai Lin & Minggang Zheng, 2023. "Current Development Status, Policy Support and Promotion Path of China’s Green Hydrogen Industries under the Target of Carbon Emission Peaking and Carbon Neutrality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Yangang Feng & Rui Chen & Lin He & Osnat Mokryn, 2022. "Decision Model of Contract-Farming Supply Chain Considering Producer’s Fairness Concerns under Random Yield," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-8, May.
    16. Shuyi Wang & S.H. Choi & Jianhua Xiao & George Q. Huang, 2024. "Low-carbon supply chain coordination through dual contracts considering pareto-efficiency," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(18), pages 6627-6648, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinhan Yu & Licheng Sun, 2022. "Supply Chain Emission Reduction Decisions, Considering Overconfidence under Conditions of Carbon Trading Price Volatility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Shengqiang Hu & Lou Liu & Xing Liu, 2024. "Wholesale Price Contract or Mixed Wholesale-Option-Contract? Procurement Strategy for a Contract Farming Supply Chain under Flexible Supply," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Biswas, Indranil & Avittathur, Balram, 2019. "Channel coordination using options contract under simultaneous price and inventory competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 45-60.
    4. Ajay Philip & Rahul R. Marathe, 2022. "A New Green Labeling Scheme for Agri-Food Supply Chains: Equilibrium and Information Sharing under Uncertainties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-34, November.
    5. Alireza Bakhshi & Jafar Heydari, 2023. "An optimal put option contract for a reverse supply chain: case of remanufacturing capacity uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 37-60, May.
    6. Hongbo Tu & Mo Pang & Lin Chen, 2023. "Freshness-Keeping Strategy of Logistics Service Providers: The Role of the Interaction between Blockchain and Overconfidence," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-35, August.
    7. Wang, Lingling & Wu, Yong & Hu, Shengqiang, 2021. "Make-to-order supply chain coordination through option contract with random yields and overconfidence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    8. Zhao, Yingxue & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, Shouyang, 2018. "Supply option contracts with spot market and demand information updating," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 1062-1071.
    9. Deng Jia & Chong Wang, 2022. "Option Contracts in Fresh Produce Supply Chain with Freshness-Keeping Effort," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Yang, Honglin & Zhuo, Wenyan & Shao, Lusheng & Talluri, Srinivas, 2021. "Mean-variance analysis of wholesale price contracts with a capital-constrained retailer: Trade credit financing vs. bank credit financing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 525-542.
    11. He, Haonan & Wang, Shanyong, 2019. "Cost-benefit associations in consumer inventory problem with uncertain benefit," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 271-284.
    12. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Jie Gao & Qingmei Tan & Bo Cui, 2024. "Reducing Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants: An Analysis Using Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Konstantinos Liagkouras & Konstantinos Metaxiotis, 2023. "Sources of Uncertainty and Risk Quantification Methods in Supply Chain Management: A Literature Study," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 1-42, December.
    15. Chengli Wei & Hongzhuan Chen & Yuanfei Kang, 2023. "Effects of Revenue-Sharing Contracts and Overconfidence on Innovation for Key Components," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Georgios Giakoumakis & Dimitrios Sidiras, 2025. "Production and Storage of Hydrogen from Biomass and Other Sources: Technologies and Policies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-41, January.
    17. Lin, Junyi & Zhou, Li & Spiegler, Virginia L.M. & Naim, Mohamed M. & Syntetos, Aris, 2022. "Push or Pull? The impact of ordering policy choice on the dynamics of a hybrid closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 282-295.
    18. Guo, Yi & Tang, Yuming & Wang, Lingzi & Wang, Yuli & Peng, Xueyuan, 2024. "Optimal design of operating frequency for the ionic liquid compressor applied in hydrogen storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    19. Juan Pedro Sepúlveda-Rojas & Rodrigo Ternero, 2020. "Analysis of the Value of Information and Coordination in a Dyadic Closed Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Hosoda, Takamichi & Disney, Stephen M., 2018. "A unified theory of the dynamics of closed-loop supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 313-326.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6181-:d:1695495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.