IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6159-d1695087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply Chain Dynamics of Moving from Peat-Based to Peat-Free Horticulture

Author

Listed:
  • M. Nazli Koseoglu

    (The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland, UK)

  • Michaela Roberts

    (The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland, UK)

Abstract

Healthy peatlands provide valuable ecosystem services. Peat extraction damages peatlands, leading to carbon emissions. One of the main reasons for peat extraction is for use in horticulture. Replacing peat with recycled organic materials in horticulture is critical to preserve the valuable ecosystems provided by peatlands and to establish more circular supply chains that are reliant on recycling rather than extraction. Despite the strong policy commitment and budget allocation to restore peatlands, the demand for peat-based growing media remains high and drives most of the peat demand. In our research, we mapped the growing media supply chain, held semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders representing different interests, and surveyed amateur gardeners in the UK to understand the bottlenecks experienced by each profile in ending peat use and how to overcome them. We employed semi-structured key expert surveys to understand the supply chain dynamics and consumer demand, informed by these early interviews and the previous literature, we prepared and distributed an online consumer survey and interviewed supply-side stakeholders to understand their perspectives. The findings indicate that the barriers of availability, cost, and performance are shared between the supply-and-demand-side stakeholders. A portfolio of financial, educational and logistic interventions is required to simultaneously support the supply side to accelerate the transformation of production and supply patterns and to aid the demand side to adapt to growing with compost of recycled organic materials. The policies promoting recycled organic material use in horticulture must be coordinated within the UK and with other parts of Europe focusing on the elimination of the peat content in products rather than peat extraction to avoid extraction and the associated destruction of peat stocks elsewhere.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Nazli Koseoglu & Michaela Roberts, 2025. "Supply Chain Dynamics of Moving from Peat-Based to Peat-Free Horticulture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6159-:d:1695087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6159/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6159/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dahlin, Johannes & Herbes, Carsten & Nelles, Michael, 2015. "Biogas digestate marketing: Qualitative insights into the supply side," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 152-161.
    2. Probert, E.J. & Dawson, G.F. & Cockrill, A., 2005. "Evaluating preferences within the composting industry in Wales using a conjoint analysis approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 128-141.
    3. Johannes Dahlin & Verena Halbherr & Peter Kurz & Michael Nelles & Carsten Herbes, 2016. "Marketing Green Fertilizers: Insights into Consumer Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dahlin, Johannes & Nelles, Michael & Herbes, Carsten, 2017. "Biogas digestate management: Evaluating the attitudes and perceptions of German gardeners towards digestate-based soil amendments," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 27-38.
    2. repec:zib:zbmbmj:v:2:y:2023:i:2:p:114-123 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Luo, Erga & Yan, Ru & He, Yaping & Han, Zhen & Feng, Yiyu & Qian, Wenrong & Li, Jinkai, 2024. "Does biogas industrial policy promote the industrial transformation?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Ricardo Situmeang & Jana Mazancová & Hynek Roubík, 2022. "Technological, Economic, Social and Environmental Barriers to Adoption of Small-Scale Biogas Plants: Case of Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Zhang, Weishi & Xu, Ying & Wang, Can & Streets, David G., 2022. "Assessment of the driving factors of CO2 mitigation costs of household biogas systems in China: A LMDI decomposition with cost analysis model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 978-989.
    6. Faubert, Patrick & Barnabé, Simon & Bouchard, Sylvie & Côté, Richard & Villeneuve, Claude, 2016. "Pulp and paper mill sludge management practices: What are the challenges to assess the impacts on greenhouse gas emissions?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 107-133.
    7. Dávid Nagy & Péter Balogh & Zoltán Gabnai & József Popp & Judit Oláh & Attila Bai, 2018. "Economic Analysis of Pellet Production in Co-Digestion Biogas Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Carsten Herbes & Johannes Dahlin & Peter Kurz, 2020. "Consumer Willingness To Pay for Proenvironmental Attributes of Biogas Digestate-Based Potting Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Peng, Wei & Beggio, Giovanni & Pivato, Alberto & Zhang, Hua & Lü, Fan & He, Pinjing, 2022. "Applications of near infrared spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging techniques in anaerobic digestion of bio-wastes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    10. Małgorzata Wilk & Marcin Gajek & Maciej Śliz & Klaudia Czerwińska & Lidia Lombardi, 2022. "Hydrothermal Carbonization Process of Digestate from Sewage Sludge: Chemical and Physical Properties of Hydrochar in Terms of Energy Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Mosleh Uddin, Md & Wen, Zhiyou & Mba Wright, Mark, 2022. "Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of using corn stover biochar for manure derived renewable natural gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    12. Yao Jiao & Yu Yang & Hongshan Zhang, 2019. "An integration model for generating and selecting product configuration plans," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1291-1302, March.
    13. Nina Tsydenova & Alethia Vázquez Morillas & Álvaro Martínez Hernández & Diana Rodríguez Soria & Camilo Wilches & Alexandra Pehlken, 2019. "Feasibility and Barriers for Anaerobic Digestion in Mexico City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Yanhu Bai & Yuchao Wang & Jianli Luo & Luyao Chang, 2025. "Can the Development of Green Fertilizers by Science and Technology Backyards Promote Green Production by Farmers? An Evolutionary Game Analysis of a Tripartite Interaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-30, June.
    15. Zhang, Xumin & Khachatryan, Hayk, "undated". "Monetary Incentives And Eco-Friendly Residential Landscape Preferences For Florida Friendly Landscaping," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266684, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    16. Rilling, Benedikt & Kurz, Peter & Herbes, Carsten, 2024. "Renewable gases in the heating market: Identifying consumer preferences through a Discrete Choice Experiment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Dahlin, Johannes & Herbes, Carsten & Nelles, Michael, 2015. "Biogas digestate marketing: Qualitative insights into the supply side," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 152-161.
    18. Vondra, Marek & Máša, Vítězslav & Bobák, Petr, 2018. "The energy performance of vacuum evaporators for liquid digestate treatment in biogas plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 141-155.
    19. Malhotra, Milan & Aboudi, Kaoutar & Pisharody, Lakshmi & Singh, Ayush & Banu, J. Rajesh & Bhatia, Shashi Kant & Varjani, Sunita & Kumar, Sunil & González-Fernández, Cristina & Kumar, Sumant & Singh, R, 2022. "Biorefinery of anaerobic digestate in a circular bioeconomy: Opportunities, challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6159-:d:1695087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.