IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6054-d1692952.html

Do Agricultural Production Services Improve Farmers’ Grain Production Efficiency?—Empirical Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Liu

    (College of Economics and Management, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Lili Gu

    (College of Economics and Management, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Cai Liao

    (College of Economics and Management, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Wei Xue

    (College of Economics and Management, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

Abstract

(1) Background: Global grain production faces challenges such as increasing demands due to population growth, limited arable land resources, and climate change, with natural resource and environmental constraints becoming increasingly stringent. Traditional smallholder economies struggle to meet the increasing demand for grain, resulting in a tight balance between grain supply and demand. Therefore, to improve grain production efficiency (GPE), clarifying the specific effects of agricultural production services (APS), a new driving force on farmers’ GPE, is critical for ensuring grain security and achieving sustainable grain production. (2) Methods: Through the super-efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Tobit models, and utilizing microdata from 747 farmers from the China Rural Revitalization Survey (CRRS), we analyzed the differences in farmers’ operating scales and types of agricultural production services to determine the extent and specific implementation effects of agricultural production services on the farmers’ GPE. (3) Results: agricultural production services enhanced the farmers’ GPE. Specifically, labor-intensive services (LIS) markedly improved the GPE of smallholder farmers but not large-scale farmers; technology-intensive services (TIS) did not have a substantial influence on either the smallholder farmers or large-scale farmers. There were significant regional differences in the threshold effect of agricultural production services on the GPE of the farmers. (4) Conclusions: Providers of agricultural production services should enhance their service capabilities to meet farmers’ diverse service needs. Government departments should establish uniform service standards and regulate industry development. Village and community organizations should leverage their grassroots coordination functions to facilitate the efficient operation of services. In addition, tailored development models should be developed for farmers of different scales, and they should be provided with financial and technical support as well as institutional guarantees.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Liu & Lili Gu & Cai Liao & Wei Xue, 2025. "Do Agricultural Production Services Improve Farmers’ Grain Production Efficiency?—Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6054-:d:1692952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6054/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6054/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Per Andersen & Niels Christian Petersen, 1993. "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1261-1264, October.
    2. Qian Liu & Yongmu Jiang & Carl‐Johan Lagerkvist & Wei Huang, 2023. "Extension services and the technical efficiency of crop‐specific farms in China," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 436-459, March.
    3. Hansen, Bruce E., 1999. "Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 345-368, December.
    4. Young, Allyn A., 1928. "Increasing Returns and Economic Progress," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 38, pages 527-542.
    5. Zhu, Joe, 2001. "Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 443-455, March.
    6. Tao Chen & Muhammad Rizwan & Azhar Abbas, 2022. "Exploring the Role of Agricultural Services in Production Efficiency in Chinese Agriculture: A Case of the Socialized Agricultural Service System," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruofan Liao & Zhengtao Chen & Jirakom Sirisrisakulchai & Jianxu Liu, 2025. "Enhancing Rural Economic Sustainability in China Through Agricultural Socialization Services: A Novel Perspective on Spatial-Temporal Dynamics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, January.
    2. Yichi Zhang & Yingen Hu & Min Wang & Hongyu Luo, 2025. "Does the “Three Rights Separation” System Improve the Economic Efficiency of Rural Residential Land Use?—Evidence from Yujiang and Deqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Nuri Ozgur DOGAN & Can Tansel TUGCU, 2015. "Energy Efficiency in Electricity Production: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach for the G-20 Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 5(1), pages 246-252.
    4. Heng Zhang & Xiangyu Guo, 2024. "Farmland Rental Market, Outsourcing Services Market and Agricultural Green Productivity: Implications for Multiple Forms of Large-Scale Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Jahanshahloo, Gholam Reza & Junior, Helcio Vieira & Lotfi, Farhad Hosseinzadeh & Akbarian, Darush, 2007. "A new DEA ranking system based on changing the reference set," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 331-337, August.
    6. Afsharian, Mohsen & Ahn, Heinz & Thanassoulis, Emmanuel, 2017. "A DEA-based incentives system for centrally managed multi-unit organisations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 587-598.
    7. Afsharian, Mohsen & Kamali, Sara & Ahn, Heinz & Bogetoft, Peter, 2024. "Individualized second stage corrections in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 563-577.
    8. Constantino J. Garcia Martin & Amparo Medal-Bartual & Marta Peris-Ortiz, 2014. "Analysis of efficiency and profitability of franchise services," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9-10), pages 796-810, July.
    9. Chen, Chun-Mei, 2019. "Evaluating the efficiency change and productivity progress of the top global telecom operators since OTT's prevalence," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1-1.
    10. Nie, Song & Zeng, Gang & Zhang, Xu & Guo, Qiaozhe, 2024. "Does local government debt pressure hamper green transition? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1185-1201.
    11. Mushtaq Taleb & Ruzelan Khalid & Ali Emrouznejad & Razamin Ramli, 2023. "Environmental efficiency under weak disposability: an improved super efficiency data envelopment analysis model with application for assessment of port operations considering NetZero," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6627-6656, July.
    12. Hanxiao Wei & Huiqin Yao, 2022. "Environmental Regulation, Roundabout Production, and Industrial Structure Transformation and Upgrading: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Stange, Henriette & Lissitsa, Alexej, 2003. "Russischer Agrarsektor Im Aufschwung? Eine Analyse Der Technischen Und Skaleneffizienz Der Agrarunternehmen," IAMO Discussion Papers 14913, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    14. Xingle Long & Yusen Luo & Huaping Sun & Gang Tian, 2018. "Fertilizer using intensity and environmental efficiency for China’s agriculture sector from 1997 to 2014," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1573-1591, July.
    15. Jahanshahloo, G.R. & Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F. & Shahverdi, R. & Adabitabar, M. & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. & Sohraiee, S., 2009. "Ranking DMUs by l1-norm with fuzzy data in DEA," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2294-2302.
    16. Haiying Liu & Wenqi Guo & Yu Wang & Dianwu Wang, 2022. "Impact of Resource on Green Growth and Threshold Effect of International Trade Levels: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Feng Dong & Ruyin Long & Zhengfu Bian & Xihui Xu & Bolin Yu & Ying Wang, 2017. "Applying a Ruggiero three-stage super-efficiency DEA model to gauge regional carbon emission efficiency: evidence from China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(3), pages 1453-1468, July.
    18. Kadziński, Miłosz & Labijak, Anna & Napieraj, Małgorzata, 2017. "Integrated framework for robustness analysis using ratio-based efficiency model with application to evaluation of Polish airports," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1-18.
    19. Ziming Bai & Xiaochen Zhang & Jiabin Xu & Cuixia Li, 2024. "Can Farmland Transfer Reduce Fertilizer Nonpoint Source Pollution? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Huyen Nguyen-Thi-Thanh, 2006. "On the Use of Data Envelopment Analysis in Hedge Fund Performance Appraisal," Working Papers halshs-00120292, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6054-:d:1692952. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.