IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6053-d1692950.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Review of Integrating Technology for Sustainable Agricultural Transitions: Ecuador, a Country with Agroecological Potential

Author

Listed:
  • William Viera-Arroyo

    (Dirección de Investigaciones, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Amazonas, Quito 170518, Ecuador)

  • Liliane Binego

    (Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience (CAWR), Coventry University, Wolston Lane, Ryton-on-Dunsmore, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK)

  • Francis Ryans

    (Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience (CAWR), Coventry University, Wolston Lane, Ryton-on-Dunsmore, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK)

  • Duther López

    (Dirección de Investigaciones, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Amazonas, Quito 170518, Ecuador)

  • Martín Moya

    (Dirección de Investigaciones, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Amazonas, Quito 170518, Ecuador)

  • Lya Vera

    (Dirección de Investigaciones, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Amazonas, Quito 170518, Ecuador)

  • Carlos Caicedo

    (Dirección de Investigaciones, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Amazonas, Quito 170518, Ecuador)

Abstract

Agroecology has traditionally been implemented using conventional methods. However, the integration of precision equipment, advanced methodologies, and digital technologies (DT) is now essential for transitioning to a more modern and efficient approach. While agroecological principles remain fundamental for planning and managing sustainable food systems by optimizing natural resources, technological tools can significantly support their implementation and adoption by farmers. This transition, however, must also consider socioeconomic factors and policy frameworks to ensure that technological advancements lead to meaningful improvements in farms and agroecosystems. Across both industrialized and emerging economies, various initiatives, such as precision agriculture, digital platforms, and e-commerce, are driving the digitalization of agroecology. These innovations offer clear benefits, including enhanced knowledge generation and direct improvements to the food supply chain; however, several barriers remain, including limited understanding of digital tools, high-energy demands, insufficient financial resources, economical constrains, weak policy support, lack of infrastructure, low digital learning by framers, etc. to facilitate the transition. This review looks for the understanding of how digitalization can align or conflict with local agroecological dynamics across distinct political frameworks and reality contexts because the information about DT adoption in agroecological practices is limited and it remains unclear if digital agriculture for scaling agroecology can considerably change power dynamics within the productive systems in regions of Europe and Latin America. In South America, among countries like Ecuador, with strong potential for agroecological development, where 60% of farms are less than 1 ha, and where farmers have expressed interest in agroecological practices, 80% have reported lacking sufficient information to make the transition to digitalization, making slow the adoption progress of these DT. While agroecology is gaining global recognition, its modernization through DT requires further research in technical, social, economic, cultural, and political dimensions to more guide the adoption of DT in agroecology with more certainty.

Suggested Citation

  • William Viera-Arroyo & Liliane Binego & Francis Ryans & Duther López & Martín Moya & Lya Vera & Carlos Caicedo, 2025. "Systematic Review of Integrating Technology for Sustainable Agricultural Transitions: Ecuador, a Country with Agroecological Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6053-:d:1692950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6053/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6053/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madhu Khanna, 2021. "Digital Transformation of the Agricultural Sector: Pathways, Drivers and Policy Implications," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1221-1242, December.
    2. Alexander Wezel & Julia Goette & Elisabeth Lagneaux & Gloria Passuello & Erica Reisman & Christophe Rodier & Grégoire Turpin, 2018. "Agroecology in Europe: Research, Education, Collective Action Networks, and Alternative Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Sara Romagnoli & Claudia Tarabu' & Behzad Maleki Vishkaei & Pietro De Giovanni, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Technologies and Sustainable Practices on Circular Supply Chain Management," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Kenneth Pigg & Stephen P. Gasteyer & Kenneth E. Martin & Kari Keating & Godwin P. Apaliyah, 2013. "The Community Capitals Framework: an empirical examination of internal relationships," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 492-502, October.
    5. Estevan Felipe Pizarro Muñoz & Paulo André Niederle & Bernardo Corrado de Gennaro & Luigi Roselli, 2021. "Agri-Food Markets towards Agroecology: Tensions and Compromises Faced by Small-Scale Farmers in Brazil and Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Felipe Gallardo-López & Mario Alejandro Hernández-Chontal & Pedro Cisneros-Saguilán & Ariadna Linares-Gabriel, 2018. "Development of the Concept of Agroecology in Europe: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Eric Sabourin & Jean-François Le Coq & Sandrine Fréguin-Gresh & Jacques Marzin & Muriel Bonin & Maria Mercedes Patrouilleau & Luis Vázquez & Paulo Niederle, 2018. "Public policies to support agroecology in Latin America and the Caribbean [¿Qué políticas públicas promueven la agroecología en América Latina y el Caribe?]," Post-Print cirad-01825722, HAL.
    8. Yadira Vargas-Tierras & Alejandra Díaz & Carlos Caicedo & Julio Macas & Alfonso Suárez-Tapia & William Viera, 2021. "Benefits of Legume Species in an Agroforestry Production System of Yellow Pitahaya in the Ecuadorian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Luwen Cui & Weiwei Wang, 2023. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of Digital Technology by Farmers in China: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Barnes, A.P. & Soto, I. & Eory, V. & Beck, B. & Balafoutis, A. & Sánchez, B. & Vangeyte, J. & Fountas, S. & van der Wal, T. & Gómez-Barbero, M., 2019. "Exploring the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: A cross regional study of EU farmers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 163-174.
    11. Laura Calvet-Mir & Petra Benyei & Laura Aceituno-Mata & Manuel Pardo-de-Santayana & Daniel López-García & María Carrascosa-García & Antonio Perdomo-Molina & Victoria Reyes-García, 2018. "The Contribution of Traditional Agroecological Knowledge as a Digital Commons to Agroecological Transitions: The Case of the CONECT-e Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, September.
    12. Lange, Steffen & Pohl, Johanna & Santarius, Tilman, 2020. "Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    13. Mwehe Mathenge & Ben G. J. S. Sonneveld & Jacqueline E. W. Broerse, 2022. "Application of GIS in Agriculture in Promoting Evidence-Informed Decision Making for Improving Agriculture Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giagnocavo, Cynthia & Duque-Acevedo, Mónica & Terán-Yépez, Eduardo & Herforth-Rahmé, Joelle & Defossez, Emeline & Carlesi, Stefano & Delalieux, Stephanie & Gkisakis, Vasileios & Márton, Aliz & Molina-, 2025. "A multi-stakeholder perspective on the use of digital technologies in European organic and agroecological farming systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Margherita Masi & Marcello Rosa & Yari Vecchio & Luca Bartoli & Felice Adinolfi, 2022. "The long way to innovation adoption: insights from precision agriculture," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Schnebelin, Éléonore, 2022. "Linking the diversity of ecologisation models to farmers' digital use profiles," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Maria Markiewicz-Keszycka & Áine Macken-Walsh & Aileen Carter & Simon Mooney & Emma J. Devereux & Maeve Henchion & Paul Hynds, 2025. "Farmers’ Experiences of Transitioning Towards Agroecology: Narratives of Change in Western Europe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Rachel Opitz & Philippe De Smedt & Victorino Mayoral-Herrera & Stefano Campana & Marco Vieri & Eamonn Baldwin & Carolina Perna & Daniele Sarri & Jeroen Verhegge, 2023. "Practicing Critical Zone Observation in Agricultural Landscapes: Communities, Technology, Environment and Archaeology," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. MacPherson, Joseph & Rosman, Anna & Helming, Katharina & Burkhard, Benjamin, 2025. "A participatory impact assessment of digital agriculture: A Bayesian network-based case study in Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    7. Alexander Wezel & Stéphane Bellon, 2018. "Mapping Agroecology in Europe. New Developments and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-3, August.
    8. Xu, Ru-Yu & Wang, Ke-Liang & Miao, Zhuang, 2024. "The impact of digital technology innovation on green total-factor energy efficiency in China: Does economic development matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    9. Tianchu Feng & Andrea Appolloni & Jiayu Chen, 2024. "How does corporate digital transformation affect carbon productivity? Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 31425-31445, December.
    10. Junhong Qu & Xiaoli Hao, 2022. "Digital Economy, Financial Development, and Energy Poverty Based on Mediating Effects and a Spatial Autocorrelation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    11. Ren, Siyu & Hao, Yu & Xu, Lu & Wu, Haitao & Ba, Ning, 2021. "Digitalization and energy: How does internet development affect China's energy consumption?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    12. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Umlai, Mohamed, 2023. "ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    13. Jing, Peng & Li, Shuohan & Wang, Minglu, 2025. "Digital empowerment, industry chain integration and corporate energy efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    14. Bentivoglio, Deborah & Bucci, Giorgia & Belletti, Matteo & Finco, Adele, 2022. "A theoretical framework on network’s dynamics for precision agriculture technologies adoption," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(4), January.
    15. Chwiłkowska-Kubala, Anna & Cyfert, Szymon & Malewska, Kamila & Mierzejewska, Katarzyna & Szumowski, Witold, 2023. "The impact of resources on digital transformation in energy sector companies. The role of readiness for digital transformation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    16. Ahmad Ali Atieh & Alhareth Abu Hussein & Saheer Al-Jaghoub & Ahmad Fathi Alheet & Murad Attiany, 2025. "The Impact of Digital Technology, Automation, and Data Integration on Supply Chain Performance: Exploring the Moderating Role of Digital Transformation," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, January.
    17. Fuming Deng & Lu Cai & Xiaolei Ma, 2024. "Does digital transformation restrict the carbon emission intensity of enterprises? Evidence from listed manufacturing enterprises in China," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2), pages 364-384, May.
    18. Axenbeck, Janna & Niebel, Thomas, 2021. "Climate Protection Potentials of Digitalized Production Processes: Microeconometric Evidence," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238007, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    19. Shunbin Zhong & Huafu Shen & Ziheng Niu & Yang Yu & Lin Pan & Yaojun Fan & Atif Jahanger, 2022. "Moving towards Environmental Sustainability: Can Digital Economy Reduce Environmental Degradation in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-23, November.
    20. Ana Salomé García-Muñiz & María Rosalía Vicente, 2021. "The Effects of Informational Feedback on the Energy Consumption of Online Services: Some Evidence for the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6053-:d:1692950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.