IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6019-d1691387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Interactive Coercive Relationship Between Urbanization and Eco-Environmental Quality in China

Author

Listed:
  • Mingxing Zhong

    (School of Tourism, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China)

Abstract

As China’s economy shifts from rapid development to high-quality development, exploring the harmony between human activities and the ecological environment has become the focus of many scholars. As the center of human activities, urbanized areas have complex and diverse impacts on the ecological environment. Previous studies have mainly focused on highly urbanized areas of importance in China, and there are fewer studies covering all prefecture-level cities across the country. Therefore, this study measured the spatial and temporal characteristics of urbanization and eco-environment quality (EEQ) in all prefecture-level cities in China from 2000 to 2020 and explored the coupling coordination degree (CCD) relationship between urbanization and EEQ through the CCD model. The results showed that the average EEQ showed a fluctuating upward trend, with the southern and northeastern regions scoring significantly higher than the western and northern regions. In terms of spatial evolution, most prefecture-level cities had small changes in EEQ, with changes ranging from −0.05 to 0.05 per decade. The average urbanization showed a rapid increasing trend, spatially distributed with high values in the east and low values in the west. In the North China Plain and along the southeast coast, urbanization was concentrated in high-value areas, showing a trend of rapid growth. From 2000 to 2020, the average CCD between urbanization and EEQ showed a continuous increasing trend, from 0.32 to 0.37, indicating a medium imbalance. However, the proportion of low-coordination and moderate-coordination prefecture-level cities increased continuously, from 31.5% and 1.0% in 2000 to 35.3% and 1.9% in 2020, respectively. This indicates that Chinese urbanization efforts are constantly being optimized and moving toward the goal of sustainable development. The results of the study provide a scientific reference basis for coordinating the relationship between urbanization development and EEQ, and they support the formulation of policies for urbanization planning and high-quality economic development in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingxing Zhong, 2025. "The Interactive Coercive Relationship Between Urbanization and Eco-Environmental Quality in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6019-:d:1691387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6019/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6019/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Sohail & Babar Nawaz Abbasi & Zahoor Ahmed, 2025. "New insights into the nexus between international trade, urbanization, nonrenewable energy consumption, and environmental quality in China: Evidence from Multivariate Threshold Regression," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(2), pages 1148-1167, May.
    2. Guo, Beibei & Fang, Yelin & Jin, Xiaobin & zhou, Yinkang, 2020. "Monitoring the effects of land consolidation on the ecological environmental quality based on remote sensing: A case study of Chaohu Lake Basin, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Yizhuo Liu & Tinggang Zhou & Wenping Yu, 2024. "Analysis of Changes in Ecological Environment Quality and Influencing Factors in Chongqing Based on a Remote-Sensing Ecological Index Mode," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Chong Ye & Jiawei Pi & Hanqi Chen, 2022. "Coupling Coordination Development of the Logistics Industry, New Urbanization and the Ecological Environment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    5. Anselin, Luc, 1988. "A test for spatial autocorrelation in seemingly unrelated regressions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 335-341.
    6. Ilhan Ozturk & Buket Savranlar & Alper Aslan & Usama Al-mulali & Seyfettin Artan, 2023. "The Dynamic Simulation Analysis of the Impact of Urbanization and Globalization on Environmental Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Irfan Khan & Fujun Hou & Abdulrasheed Zakari & Vincent Tawiah & Syed Ahtsham Ali, 2022. "Energy use and urbanization as determinants of China’s environmental quality: prospects of the Paris climate agreement," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(13), pages 2363-2386, October.
    8. Tianxiang Long & Zhuhui Bai & Bohong Zheng, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Forces of Ecological Environment Quality in Coastal Cities: A Remote Sensing and Land Use Perspective in Changle District, Fuzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    10. Jiachen Liu & Tao Xie & Du Lyu & Lu Cui & Qiuman Liu, 2024. "Analyzing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Forces of Ecological Environment Quality in the Qinling Mountains, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Zhiyu Shi & Yating Wang & Qing Zhao, 2023. "Analysis of Spatiotemporal Changes of Ecological Environment Quality and Its Coupling Coordination with Urbanization in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Shihe Zhang & Quanlin Zhong & Dongliang Cheng & Chaobin Xu & Yunni Chang & Yuying Lin & Baoyin Li, 2022. "Coupling Coordination Analysis and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Risks and Ecosystem Services in the Min River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Yingchao Song & Yisheng Gao & Shuxin Zhang & Huizhong Dong & Xuefeng Liu, 2024. "Research on the Coupling Coordination and Driving Mechanisms of New-Type Urbanization and the Ecological Environment in China’s Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Lusheng Che & Shuyan Yin & Junfang Jin & Weijian Wu, 2024. "Assessment and Simulation of Urban Ecological Environment Quality Based on Geographic Information System Ecological Index," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fangfang Sun & Chengcheng Dong & Longlong Zhao & Jinsong Chen & Li Wang & Ruixia Jiang & Hongzhong Li, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Variation and Influencing Factors of Ecological Quality in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Based on the Unified Remote Sensing Ecological Index over the Past 30 Years," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Zhongwu Zhang & Huimin Li & Yongjian Cao, 2022. "Research on the Coordinated Development of Economic Development and Ecological Environment of Nine Provinces (Regions) in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Xiaoqing Lin & Chunyan Lu & Kaishan Song & Ying Su & Yifan Lei & Lianxiu Zhong & Yibin Gao, 2020. "Analysis of Coupling Coordination Variance between Urbanization Quality and Eco-Environment Pressure: A Case Study of the West Taiwan Strait Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Michael Greenstone & Rema Hanna, 2014. "Environmental Regulations, Air and Water Pollution, and Infant Mortality in India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(10), pages 3038-3072, October.
    5. Dongqing Han & Dayong Zhang & Peng Yue & Zhengxu Cao, 2024. "Toward Sustainable Development: Can Digital Transformation of Industrial Enterprise Drive Carbon Reduction?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Fatima Zahra Moussaid & Hikma Bachegour & Mounir Jerry & Ahlam Qafas, 2025. "Probing the asymmetric impact of clean energy technologies on environmental quality: testing load capacity curve hypothesis in Spain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4425-4444, February.
    7. Fujii, Hidemichi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2013. "Which industry is greener? An empirical study of nine industries in OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 381-388.
    8. Pantelis Kalaitzidakis & Theofanis P. Mamuneas & Thanasis Stengos, 2008. "The Contribution of Pollution to Productivity Growth," Working Paper series 06_08, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    9. Muhammad Shahbaz & Vassilios G. Papavassiliou & Amine Lahiani & David Roubaud, 2023. "Are we moving towards decarbonisation of the global economy? Lessons from the distant past to the present," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2620-2634, July.
    10. Song, Tao & Zheng, Tingguo & Tong, Lianjun, 2008. "An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A panel cointegration approach," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 381-392, September.
    11. Giedrė Lapinskienė & Kęstutis Peleckis & Neringa Slavinskaitė, 2017. "Energy consumption, economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union countries," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 1082-1097, November.
    12. Emrah Kocak & Hayriye Hilal Baglitas, 2022. "The path to sustainable municipal solid waste management: Do human development, energy efficiency, and income inequality matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1947-1962, December.
    13. Halldén, Filip & Hultberg, Anna & Ahmed, Ali & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Yahya, Muhammad & Troster, Victor, 2025. "The role of institutional quality on public renewable energy investments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    14. Paul Welfens & Jens Perret & Deniz Erdem, 2010. "Global economic sustainability indicator: analysis and policy options for the Copenhagen process," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 153-185, August.
    15. Nicole Grunewald & Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso, 2009. "Driving Factors of Carbon Dioxide Emissions and the Impact from Kyoto Protocol," Ibero America Institute for Econ. Research (IAI) Discussion Papers 190, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.
    16. Bradford David F. & Fender Rebecca A & Shore Stephen H. & Wagner Martin, 2005. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Exploring a Fresh Specification," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-28, June.
    17. Lei Gao & Taowu Pei & Jingran Zhang & Yu Tian, 2022. "The “Pollution Halo” Effect of FDI: Evidence from the Chinese Sichuan–Chongqing Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Ghimire, Narishwar & Woodward, Richard T., 2013. "Under- and over-use of pesticides: An international analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 73-81.
    19. Yan, Bingqian & Xia, Yan & Jiang, Xuemei, 2023. "Carbon productivity and value-added generations: Regional heterogeneity along global value chain," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 111-125.
    20. Elbert Dijkgraaf & Herman Vollebergh, 2005. "A Test for Parameter Homogeneity in CO 2 Panel EKC Estimations," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 32(2), pages 229-239, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6019-:d:1691387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.