IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5986-d1690630.html

Research on the Carbon Reduction Effects of Industrial Structure Upgrading in the Context of a Unified National Market

Author

Listed:
  • Shun Han

    (College of Economics & Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Zefang Liao

    (College of Economics & Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)

Abstract

Facilitating industrial restructuring and modernization plays a pivotal role in realizing China’s dual-carbon objectives (carbon peaking and carbon neutrality) and advancing sustainable socioeconomic progress. Leveraging panel data from 30 provincial-level administrative units (2005–2022) and adopting the Spatial Durbin Model, this research investigates how industrial structure upgrading influences carbon emission intensity within the framework of a unified national market, while elucidating its operational mechanisms. The key findings include the following: (1) Provincial carbon emission intensity demonstrates pronounced “high-high” and “low-low” spatial agglomeration during the study period. Industrial restructuring exhibits marked carbon abatement effects, accompanied by discernible cross-regional spillover benefits. (2) Industrial structure upgrading can reduce carbon emission levels by promoting the technology diffusion effect, while the competitive demonstration effect of digitalization has not yet manifested. (3) The establishment of an integrated national market enhances the capacity of industrial upgrading to suppress carbon emission intensity. (4) The emission-reducing impacts of industrial restructuring manifest heterogeneous patterns across regions and temporal phases: In Eastern China, industrial upgrading paradoxically elevates emission intensity. Central-western regions experience significant emission reductions. Temporally, the relationship follows an inverted U-shaped trajectory. These insights underscore the necessity for policymakers to refine industrial modernization strategies, expedite nationwide market integration mechanisms, and cultivate region-specific green transition roadmaps.

Suggested Citation

  • Shun Han & Zefang Liao, 2025. "Research on the Carbon Reduction Effects of Industrial Structure Upgrading in the Context of a Unified National Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5986-:d:1690630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5986/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5986/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Ben & Du, Mingze & Wang, Dehui, 2024. "Carbon emissions trading, industrial structure upgrading and green development: Excess benefits of combined actions," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 480-501.
    2. Parsley, David C. & Wei, Shang-Jin, 2001. "Explaining the border effect: the role of exchange rate variability, shipping costs, and geography," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 87-105, October.
    3. Xie, Pinjie & Shu, Yalin & Sun, Feihu & Li, Pin, 2024. "Decoupling economic development from carbon emissions: Insights from Chinese provinces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    4. Timmer, Marcel P. & Szirmai, Adam, 2000. "Productivity growth in Asian manufacturing: the structural bonus hypothesis examined," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 371-392, December.
    5. Dongsheng Yan & Pingxing Li, 2023. "Can Regional Integration Reduce Urban Carbon Emission? An Empirical Study Based on the Yangtze River Delta, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Melania-Gabriela Ciot, 2021. "On European Green Deal and Sustainable Development Policy (the Case of Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Chen, Huanyu & Yi, Jizheng & Chen, Aibin & Peng, Duanxiang & Yang, Jieqiong, 2023. "Green technology innovation and CO2 emission in China: Evidence from a spatial-temporal analysis and a nonlinear spatial durbin model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Stephen Casler & Adam Rose, 1998. "Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the U.S. Economy: A Structural Decomposition Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(3), pages 349-363, April.
    9. Wang, Di & Liang, Y.F. & Dou, Wei, 2025. "How does urban industrial structure upgrading affect green productivity? The moderating role of smart city development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 133-149.
    10. Wang, Ruonan & Xiao, Yi & Huang, Huan & Chang, Ming, 2024. "Exploring the complex relationship between industrial upgrading and energy eco-efficiency in river basin cities: A case study of the Yellow River Basin in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    11. Li, Jianglong & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "Does energy and CO2 emissions performance of China benefit from regional integration?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 366-378.
    12. Yang, Zhijiu & Duan, Jiani & Fan, Niuniu, 2024. "Towards carbon neutrality: The decoupling effect of industrial restructuring and non-fossil energy substitution on carbon emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daiwei Zhang & Ming Jing & Weiwei Chen & Buhui Chang & Ting Li & Shuai Zhang & En Liu & Ziming Li & Chang Liu, 2025. "Unveiling the Intrinsic Linkages Between “Water–Carbon–Ecology” Footprints in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Qian Cheng & Yongqing Xiong & Jinghui Liu, 2025. "The impact of electric vehicle adoption on regional energy market integration in China," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 39(2), pages 217-244, June.
    3. Chen, Xu & Xu, Huilin & Zhang, Liang & Cao, Huiping, 2022. "Spatial functional division, infrastructure and carbon emissions: Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Li, Jianglong & Xie, Chunping & Long, Houyin, 2019. "The roles of inter-fuel substitution and inter-market contagion in driving energy prices: evidences from China’s coal market," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102540, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Kun Zheng & Hongbing Deng & Kangni Lyu & Shuang Yang & Yu Cao, 2022. "Market Integration, Industrial Structure, and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Shuang Guo & Xiaodong Yan, 2025. "Investigation of Industrial Structure Upgrading, Energy Consumption Transition, and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-30, May.
    7. Xu, Chen & Bin, Qiu & Shaoqin, Sun, 2021. "Polycentric spatial structure and energy efficiency: Evidence from China's provincial panel data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    8. Demet Yilmazkuday & Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2017. "The role of direct flights in trade costs," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 153(2), pages 249-270, May.
    9. Fethi Amri & Khaled Nasri, 2025. "Innovation technology and environmental sustainability: income is key," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 27(4), pages 727-739, October.
    10. Liu, Chang & Lin, Boqiang, 2020. "Is increasing-block electricity pricing effectively carried out in China? A case study in Shanghai and Shenzhen," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    11. Fan, Zhenqi & Cui, Jie & Wu, Wenjing, 2026. "Spatial spillover effect of green credit on carbon emission intensity in China: The role of high-quality productive forces," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Xinpeng Gao & Sufeng Li, 2025. "A Dynamic Evolution and Spatiotemporal Convergence Analysis of the Coordinated Development Between New Quality Productive Forces and China’s Carbon Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-28, April.
    13. Chunjie Jia & Meng Shang & Junwei Cao & Yu Liu, 2023. "Empirical analysis of the impact of the digital economy on the green transformation of manufacturing: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Liying Zheng & Fangjuan Zhan & Fangrong Ren, 2025. "Carbon Dioxide Emission-Reduction Efficiency in China’s New Energy Vehicle Sector Toward Sustainable Development: Evidence from a Three-Stage Super-Slacks Based-Measure Data Envelopment Analysis Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-26, August.
    15. Waights, Sevrin, 2018. "Does the law of one price hold for hedonic prices?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 55(15), pages 3299-3317.
    16. Pauline Grosjean & Claudia Senik, 2011. "Democracy, Market Liberalization, and Political Preferences," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(1), pages 365-381, February.
    17. Rumler, Fabio & Reiff, Adam, 2014. "Within- and cross-country price dispersion in the euro area," Working Paper Series 1742, European Central Bank.
    18. Erik Dietzenbacher & Jesper Stage, 2006. "Mixing oil and water? Using hybrid input-output tables in a Structural decomposition analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 85-95.
    19. Alam, Md. Rafayet & Morshed, A.K.M. Mahbub, 2021. "Price dispersion across U.S. cities: The role of Walmart," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 227-237.
    20. D. A. Izotov & K. I. Tochkov, 2020. "Interaction of the Russian Far East and Asia-Pacific Countries: Assessment of Institutional and Tariff Barriers to Trade," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 182-193, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5986-:d:1690630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.