IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5907-d1688458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Academic Entrepreneurship Research: The Cases of Bulgaria, Malta, and Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Mina Nikolaeva Angelova

    (Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, University of Plovdiv Paisii Hilendarski, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

  • Daniela Dobreva Pastarmadzhieva

    (Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, University of Plovdiv Paisii Hilendarski, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

  • Milosh Raykov

    (Faculty of Education, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta)

  • Mustafa Yunus Eryaman

    (Faculty of Education, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale 17100, Turkey)

  • Martina Riedler

    (Faculty of Education, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale 17100, Turkey)

Abstract

Entrepreneurship development strategies are crucial for translating academic potential into economic and societal value. To achieve this, educational institutions must understand the factors influencing students’ entrepreneurial intentions. While research on academic entrepreneurship exists, comparative studies that explore these factors across different national contexts are scarce. This study addresses this gap through a comparative analysis of student entrepreneurship in Bulgaria, Malta, and Turkey, investigating key factors, such as attitudes toward entrepreneurship (ATE), the role of entrepreneurship education (EEdu), and entrepreneurial inspirations. Based on 415 survey responses collected between April and June 2024, hypothesized relationships were tested using appropriate bivariate statistical analyses. The results indicate that a positive evaluation of running one’s own business significantly increases entrepreneurial intentions, particularly when the business is perceived as safe, realistic, pleasant, and strong. The university’s role is pivotal: students largely relied on institutional support for their business initiatives; showed a strong preference for practical, hands-on educational methods; and identified a lack of entrepreneurship education as a key obstacle. A family background with entrepreneurial parents also positively influenced students’ preference for running their own businesses. Interestingly, the findings challenge a simple dichotomy between employment and entrepreneurship. A preference for full-time employment did not diminish entrepreneurial intentions, suggesting students may view these career paths as complementary or sequential. Conversely, preferences for part-time or self-employment did not have a significant positive impact on entrepreneurial initiatives. These findings underscore the need for universities to provide tailored, practical support and to recognize the complex and non-linear career trajectories envisioned by modern students.

Suggested Citation

  • Mina Nikolaeva Angelova & Daniela Dobreva Pastarmadzhieva & Milosh Raykov & Mustafa Yunus Eryaman & Martina Riedler, 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of Academic Entrepreneurship Research: The Cases of Bulgaria, Malta, and Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-34, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5907-:d:1688458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5907/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5907/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5907-:d:1688458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.