IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5794-d1686020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hydropower Reservoir Greenhouse Gas Emissions: State of the Science and Roadmap for Further Research to Improve Emission Accounting and Mitigation

Author

Listed:
  • Surabhi Karambelkar

    (Low Impact Hydropower Institute, Boston, MA 02111, USA)

  • Maryalice Fischer

    (Low Impact Hydropower Institute, Boston, MA 02111, USA)

  • Shannon Ames

    (Low Impact Hydropower Institute, Boston, MA 02111, USA)

Abstract

Rapidly decarbonizing the electricity grid is crucial for achieving net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by mid-century and mitigating climate change impacts. Hydropower facilities can directly support grid decarbonization; however, like all energy systems, they emit GHGs throughout their lifecycle, with reservoirs being an important source. Further research is urgently needed to improve the accounting and mitigation of hydropower reservoir GHG emissions to ensure that this technology is accurately considered in decarbonization policies and to allow project owners and energy buyers to make credible emission claims regarding this energy source. To this end, this paper reviews over seven dozen studies and emerging research to synthesize the current state of the science on reservoir GHG emission pathways as well as advancements in emission measurement tools to identify areas where further research is needed. This paper presents a research roadmap for government agencies, research institutions, and funding organizations covering four action areas: understanding and reducing uncertainties in reservoir GHG estimation and associated publicly accessible estimation tools; reducing the technical and economic barriers for reservoir managers to use GHG estimation tools; setting common standards to enable consistent monitoring, allocation, and reporting of reservoir GHG emissions; and supporting work on reservoir GHG emission mitigation strategies, including watershed-scale strategies. Progress in these areas will enable robust accounting of hydropower reservoir GHG emissions and targeted mitigation efforts to advance grid decarbonization.

Suggested Citation

  • Surabhi Karambelkar & Maryalice Fischer & Shannon Ames, 2025. "Hydropower Reservoir Greenhouse Gas Emissions: State of the Science and Roadmap for Further Research to Improve Emission Accounting and Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5794-:d:1686020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5794/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5794/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimanchev, Emil G. & Hodge, Joshua L. & Parsons, John E., 2021. "The role of hydropower reservoirs in deep decarbonization policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Raadal, Hanne Lerche & Gagnon, Luc & Modahl, Ingunn Saur & Hanssen, Ole Jørgen, 2011. "Life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the generation of wind and hydro power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(7), pages 3417-3422, September.
    3. Levasseur, A. & Mercier-Blais, S. & Prairie, Y.T. & Tremblay, A. & Turpin, C., 2021. "Improving the accuracy of electricity carbon footprint: Estimation of hydroelectric reservoir greenhouse gas emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Ion V. Ion & Antoaneta Ene, 2021. "Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Reservoirs: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gemechu, Eskinder & Kumar, Amit, 2022. "A review of how life cycle assessment has been used to assess the environmental impacts of hydropower energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Fangyi Li & Zhaoyang Ye & Xilin Xiao & Dawei Ma, 2019. "Environmental Benefits of Stock Evolution of Coal-Fired Power Generators in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Abolhosseini, Shahrouz & Heshmati, Almas & Altmann, Jörn, 2014. "A Review of Renewable Energy Supply and Energy Efficiency Technologies," IZA Discussion Papers 8145, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Emblemsvåg, Jan, 2022. "Wind energy is not sustainable when balanced by fossil energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    5. Ge, Zewen & Geng, Yong & Wei, Wendong & Jiang, Mingkun & Chen, Bin & Li, Jiashuo, 2023. "Embodied carbon emissions induced by the construction of hydropower infrastructure in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Michels-Brito, Adriane & Rodriguez, Daniel Andrés & Cruz Junior, Wellington Luís & Nildo de Souza Vianna, João, 2021. "The climate change potential effects on the run-of-river plant and the environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Ortega, Margarita & del Río, Pablo & Montero, Eduardo A., 2013. "Assessing the benefits and costs of renewable electricity. The Spanish case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 294-304.
    8. Kim, Jaden & Jaumotte, Florence & Panton, Augustus J. & Schwerhoff, Gregor, 2025. "Energy security and the green transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    9. Ludin, Norasikin Ahmad & Mustafa, Nur Ifthitah & Hanafiah, Marlia M. & Ibrahim, Mohd Adib & Asri Mat Teridi, Mohd & Sepeai, Suhaila & Zaharim, Azami & Sopian, Kamaruzzaman, 2018. "Prospects of life cycle assessment of renewable energy from solar photovoltaic technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 11-28.
    10. Dolter, Brett & Fellows, G. Kent & Rivers, Nicholas, 2022. "The cost effectiveness of new reservoir hydroelectricity: British Columbia’s Site C project," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Sokka, L. & Sinkko, T. & Holma, A. & Manninen, K. & Pasanen, K. & Rantala, M. & Leskinen, P., 2016. "Environmental impacts of the national renewable energy targets – A case study from Finland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1599-1610.
    12. Dong, Shihao & Yu, Yuelong & Li, Bingxue & Ni, Long, 2025. "Thermal analysis of medium-depth borehole heat exchanger coupled layered stratum thermal conductivity," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    13. Lyu, Chen & Liu, Xiaoman & Wang, Zhen & Yang, Lu & Liu, Hao & Yang, Nan & Xu, Shaodong & Cao, Libin & Zhang, Zhe & Pang, Lingyun & Zhang, Li & Cai, Bofeng, 2023. "An emissions inventory using flight information reveals the long-term changes of aviation CO2 emissions in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    14. Gao, Cheng-kang & Na, Hong-ming & Song, Kai-hui & Dyer, Noel & Tian, Fan & Xu, Qing-jiang & Xing, Yu-hong, 2019. "Environmental impact analysis of power generation from biomass and wind farms in different locations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 307-317.
    15. Song, Cuihong & Gardner, Kevin H. & Klein, Sharon J.W. & Souza, Simone Pereira & Mo, Weiwei, 2018. "Cradle-to-grave greenhouse gas emissions from dams in the United States of America," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 945-956.
    16. Zhou, Bin & Li, Wentao & Chan, Ka Wing & Cao, Yijia & Kuang, Yonghong & Liu, Xi & Wang, Xiong, 2016. "Smart home energy management systems: Concept, configurations, and scheduling strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 30-40.
    17. Paul E. Hardisty & Tom S. Clark & Robert G. Hynes, 2012. "Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Electricity Generation: A Comparative Analysis of Australian Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-26, March.
    18. Karunathilake, Hirushie & Hewage, Kasun & Mérida, Walter & Sadiq, Rehan, 2019. "Renewable energy selection for net-zero energy communities: Life cycle based decision making under uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 558-573.
    19. Turconi, Roberto & Boldrin, Alessio & Astrup, Thomas, 2013. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 555-565.
    20. Schmitt, Rafael Jan Pablo & Rosa, Lorenzo, 2024. "Dams for hydropower and irrigation: Trends, challenges, and alternatives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5794-:d:1686020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.