IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5517-d1679616.html

The Impact of Quarantine on Food Consumption During Public Health Emergencies

Author

Listed:
  • Shan Jin

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

  • Yan Yang

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

  • Junyan Zhang

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

  • Fengjie Jing

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

Abstract

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted scholars to investigate the consumption phenomena during public health emergencies. Nonetheless, there remains a limited understanding of how quarantine measures influence consumer behavior, particularly in relation to food consumption. This study employed five studies to examine the impact of quarantine on consumers’ food consumption choices (hedonic consumption) through the lens of emotion regulation and attribution theories. The findings revealed the following: (1) Quarantine measures during public health emergencies encourage consumers’ hedonic consumption. (2) Quarantined individuals exhibit heightened deservingness compared with those who are not quarantined, leading to an increased willingness for hedonic consumption; (3) Furthermore, individuals in voluntary quarantine demonstrated stronger deservingness than those in mandatory quarantine, resulting in a greater propensity for hedonic consumption; (4) Resilience moderated the effect of quarantine on hedonic consumption. Individuals with low resilience exhibited stronger deservingness and were more inclined to indulge during quarantine than their high-resilience counterparts, who showed no significant differences between quarantine and non-quarantine conditions during public health emergencies; (5) The interactive effect of deservingness and self-control influenced consumers’ hedonic consumption choices during quarantine events. Specifically, individuals with high self-control abilities mitigate the impact of quarantine on unhealthy consumption, providing insights for developing interventions to improve mental health and sustainable allocation of consumption resources during public health crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Shan Jin & Yan Yang & Junyan Zhang & Fengjie Jing, 2025. "The Impact of Quarantine on Food Consumption During Public Health Emergencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5517-:d:1679616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Das, Gopal & Mukherjee, Amaradri & Smith, Ronn J., 2018. "The Perfect Fit: The Moderating Role of Selling Cues on Hedonic and Utilitarian Product Types," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 203-216.
    2. Xun (Irene) Huang & Zhongqiang (Tak) Huang & Robert S WyerJr & Darren DahlEditor & JoAndrea HoeggAssociate Editor, 2018. "The Influence of Social Crowding on Brand Attachment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 1068-1084.
    3. Adel Nikjoo & Bardia Shabani & Ana Beatriz Hernández-Lara, 2021. "What do people share from quarantine?," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(14), pages 1965-1969, July.
    4. Michael K. Lindell & Ronald W. Perry, 2012. "The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 616-632, April.
    5. Weinberg, Peter & Gottwald, Wolfgang, 1982. "Impulsive consumer buying as a result of emotions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 43-57, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annabelle Workman & Penelope J. Jones & Amanda J. Wheeler & Sharon L. Campbell & Grant J. Williamson & Chris Lucani & David M.J.S. Bowman & Nick Cooling & Fay H. Johnston, 2021. "Environmental Hazards and Behavior Change: User Perspectives on the Usability and Effectiveness of the AirRater Smartphone App," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Zha, Wenbin & Li, Jian, 2025. "Understanding commuters' perceived accessibility and travel intentions under rainstorm warnings in Shanghai, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 276-294.
    3. Pozharliev, Rumen & De Angelis, Matteo & Rossi, Dario & Bagozzi, Richard & Amatulli, Cesare, 2023. "I might try it: Marketing actions to reduce consumer disgust toward insect-based food," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 149-167.
    4. Julia S. Becker & Sally H. Potter & Lauren J. Vinnell & Kazuya Nakayachi & Sara K. McBride & David M. Johnston, 2020. "Earthquake early warning in Aotearoa New Zealand: a survey of public perspectives to guide warning system development," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. David V. Pynadath & Bistra Dilkina & David C. Jeong & Richard S. John & Stacy C. Marsella & Chirag Merchant & Lynn C. Miller & Stephen J. Read, 2023. "Disaster world," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 84-117, March.
    6. Yue Huang & Lu Suo, 2021. "Factors Affecting Chinese Consumers’ Impulse Buying Decision of Live Streaming E-Commerce," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(5), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Jinjing Yang & Cong Cao & Chensang Ye & Yangyan Shi, 2022. "Effects of Interface Design and Live Atmosphere on Consumers’ Impulse-Buying Behaviour from the Perspective of Human–Computer Interaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Anwar Sadat Shimul, 2022. "Brand attachment: a review and future research," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 400-419, July.
    9. Choi, Sunkyung & Maharjan, Rajali & Hong, Tran Thi Nhat & Hanaoka, Shinya, 2024. "Impact of information provision on tsunami evacuation behavior of residents and international tourists in Japan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 264-273.
    10. Tan, Fuqiang & Li, Xi & Agarwal, Reeti & Joshi, Yatish & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar, 2024. "Does multilingual packaging influence purchasing in retail segment? Evidence from multiple experiments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Joaquin Gómez-Miñambres & Eric Schniter, 2017. "Emotions and Behavior Regulation in Decision Dilemmas," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-25, May.
    12. Sinha, Piyush Kumar & Mishra, Hari Govind & Kaul, Surabhi & Singh, Sarabjot, 2014. "Buying Impulsive Trait: An effective moderator for shopping emotions and perceived risk," IIMA Working Papers WP2014-03-17, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    13. Manqing Wu & Guochun Wu, 2020. "An Analysis of Rural Households’ Earthquake-Resistant Construction Behavior: Evidence from Pingliang and Yuxi, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Lingxin Min & Zhiyuan Yu, 2025. "Intergenerational Information-Sharing Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: From Protective Action Decision Model Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-25, August.
    15. Ji Yun Lee & Fangjiao Ma & Yue Li, 2022. "Understanding homeowner proactive actions for managing wildfire risks," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1525-1547, November.
    16. Li, You & Chang, Yaping & Liang, Zhehao, 2022. "Attracting more meaningful interactions: The impact of question and product types on comments on social media advertisings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 89-101.
    17. Michael R. Greenberg & Marc D. Weiner & Robert Noland & Jeanne Herb & Marjorie Kaplan & Anthony J. Broccoli, 2014. "Public Support for Policies to Reduce Risk After Hurricane Sandy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(6), pages 997-1012, June.
    18. Jiaqi Liu & Xiaodan Yu, 2025. "Social Media as a Catalyst for Sustainable Public Health Practices: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis of Protective Behaviors in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Graf, Julia & Renner, Renate & Klebel, Thomas, 2025. "Bridging Warning and Adaptation Addressing Risk Communication Strategies for Short-Term Natural Hazard Warnings and Long-Term Risk Adaptation – A Scoping Review," SocArXiv tmwrv_v1, Center for Open Science.
    20. Andrea Cerase & Lorenzo Cugliari, 2023. "Something Still Remains: Factors Affecting Tsunami Risk Perception on the Coasts Hit by the Reggio Calabria-Messina 1908 Event (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5517-:d:1679616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.