IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5495-d1678976.html

Parks and People: Spatial and Social Equity Inquiry in Shanghai, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xi Peng

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Xiang Yin

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

Urban parks are essential public resources that contribute significantly to residents’ well-being. However, disparities in the spatial distribution and social benefits of urban parks remain a pressing issue. This study focuses on the central urban area of Shanghai, a representative high-density megacity, and its findings hold significant reference value for similar cities, systematically evaluating urban park services from the perspectives of accessibility, spatial equity, and social equity. Leveraging multi-source big data and enhanced analytical methods, this study examines disparities and spatial mismatches in park services. By incorporating dynamic data, such as actual visitor attendance and residents’ travel preferences, and improving analytical models, such as an enhanced Gaussian two-step floating catchment area method and spatial lag regression models, this research significantly improves the accuracy and reliability of its findings. Key findings include (1) significant variations in accessibility exist across different types of parks, with regional and city parks offering better accessibility compared to pocket parks and community parks. (2) Park resources are unevenly distributed, with neighborhoods within the inner ring exhibiting relatively low overall accessibility. (3) A spatial mismatch is observed between park accessibility and housing prices, highlighting equity concerns. The dual spatial-social imbalance phenomenon reveals the prevalent contradiction in rapidly urbanizing areas where public service provision lags behind land development. Based on these results, this study proposes targeted recommendations for optimizing urban park layouts, including increasing the supply of small parks in inner-ring areas, enhancing the multifunctionality of parks, and strengthening policy support for disadvantaged communities. These findings contribute new theoretical insights into urban park equity and fine-grained governance while offering valuable references for urban planning and policymaking.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi Peng & Xiang Yin, 2025. "Parks and People: Spatial and Social Equity Inquiry in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5495-:d:1678976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5495/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5495/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Getis, Arthur, 2007. "Reflections on spatial autocorrelation," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 491-496, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shengnan Zhao & Xirui Wen & Yuhang Ge & Xuning Qiao & Yu Wang & Jing Zhang & Wenfei Luan, 2025. "Assessment and Layout Optimization of Urban Parks Based on Accessibility and Green Space Justice: A Case Study of Zhengzhou City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arturo Bujanda & Thomas M. Fullerton, 2017. "Impacts of transportation infrastructure on single-family property values," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(51), pages 5183-5199, November.
    2. Peng, Ruoqing & Tang, Justin Hayse Chiwing G. & Yang, Xiong & Meng, Meng & Zhang, Jie & Zhuge, Chengxiang, 2024. "Investigating the factors influencing the electric vehicle market share: A comparative study of the European Union and United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    3. Janka Lengyel & Seraphim Alvanides & Jan Friedrich, 2023. "Modelling the interdependence of spatial scales in urban systems," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(1), pages 182-197, January.
    4. Kim, Jinwon & Jang, Seongsoo & Kang, Sanghoon & Kim, SeungHyun (James), 2020. "Why are hotel room prices different? Exploring spatially varying relationships between room price and hotel attributes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 118-129.
    5. Shahnazi, Rouhollah & Dehghan Shabani, Zahra, 2021. "The effects of renewable energy, spatial spillover of CO2 emissions and economic freedom on CO2 emissions in the EU," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 293-307.
    6. Jiaxing Pang & Hengji Li & Chengpeng Lu & Chenyu Lu & Xingpeng Chen, 2020. "Regional Differences and Dynamic Evolution of Carbon Emission Intensity of Agriculture Production in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Ge, Tao & Li, Chunying & Li, Jinye & Hao, Xionglei, 2023. "Does neighboring green development benefit or suffer from local economic growth targets? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Ousmane Traoré, 2020. "Economic Growth and Human Capital Accumulation across Countries: Evidence from WAEMU Region," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 26(2), pages 147-159, May.
    9. Johanna Choumert & Laure Cormier, 2011. "The provision of urban parks: an empirical test of spatial spillovers in an urban area using geographic information systems," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 47(2), pages 437-450, October.
    10. Min Ho Shin & Hwan Yong Kim & Donghwan Gu & Hyoungsub Kim, 2017. "LEED, Its Efficacy and Fallacy in a Regional Context—An Urban Heat Island Case in California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-11, September.
    11. Hua Zhu & Han Zhao & Rong Ou & Qing Zeng & Ling Hu & Hongfang Qiu & Manoj Sharma & Mengliang Ye, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Epidemiology of Varicella in Chongqing, China, 2014–2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Andrea De Montis & Simone Caschili & Daniele Trogu, 2014. "Spatial organization and accessibility: a study of US counties," Chapters, in: Ana Condeço-Melhorado & Aura Reggiani & Javier Gutiérrez (ed.), Accessibility and Spatial Interaction, chapter 6, pages 113-132, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Anna Gloria Billé & Roberto Benedetti & Paolo Postiglione, 2017. "A two-step approach to account for unobserved spatial heterogeneity," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 452-471, October.
    14. Agnieszka Tłuczak, 2020. "Diversity of the selected elements of agricultural potential in the European Union countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(6), pages 260-268.
    15. Copiello, Sergio, 2019. "Peer and neighborhood effects: Citation analysis using a spatial autoregressive model and pseudo-spatial data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 238-254.
    16. Yun Shen & Yanxi Jing & Yiyue Liu, 2025. "Unveiling the Spatial Coupling Dynamics and Coordination Mechanisms Between Digital Inclusive Finance and Rural Industrial Integration Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, February.
    17. Polina A. Popova & Tatiana V. Bukina & Dmitriy V. Kashin, 2024. "Influence of Interregional Spatial Effects on the Economic Development of Russian Regions," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 23(3), pages 751-775.
    18. Ligang Lyu & Junjun Zhu & Hualou Long & Kaihua Liao & Yeting Fan & Junxiao Wang, 2024. "Effects of farmland use transition on soil organic carbon in dry farming areas," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 7055-7078, March.
    19. Jie Feng & Ganlin Hong & Wenrong Qian & Ruifa Hu & Guanming Shi, 2020. "Aging in China: An International and Domestic Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    20. repec:uii:journl:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:15-24 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. YunJae Ock & Vivek Shandas & Fernanda Ribeiro & Noah Young, 2024. "Drivers of Tree Canopy Loss in a Mid-Sized Growing City: Case Study in Portland, OR (USA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5495-:d:1678976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.