IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i10p2055-d1771422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment and Layout Optimization of Urban Parks Based on Accessibility and Green Space Justice: A Case Study of Zhengzhou City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Shengnan Zhao

    (School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China
    Jiaozuo Municipal Natural Resources and Planning Bureau Shanyang Service Center, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Xirui Wen

    (School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Yuhang Ge

    (School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Xuning Qiao

    (School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China
    Research Centre of Arable Land Protection and Urban-Rural High-Quality Development of Yellow River Basin, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Yu Wang

    (School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Jing Zhang

    (School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Wenfei Luan

    (School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China
    State Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

Addressing the imbalance between supply and demand for urban parks necessitates an assessment of their service accessibility and spatial equity. This study integrates multi-source geographic data, uses multiple data sources to generate a population distribution with high spatial resolution, and constructs park service areas with multiple time thresholds based on travel preference surveys. The network analysis method is used to evaluate the supply–demand ratio and spatial equity by using location entropy, Lorenz curves, and the Gini coefficient to identify the optimal location. The results reveal a significant difference in the supply–demand ratio of parks. Within the 5 min time threshold, only 14.68% of the pixels in the park supply area meet the needs of residents, while the proportions for the 15 min and 30 min time service area expands to 71.74% and 86.34%, respectively. The distribution of parks exhibits apparent spatial inequity. Equity is highest for the 15 min service area (Gini coefficient = 0.25), followed by the 30 min area (Gini coefficient = 0.27) and 5 min areas (Gini coefficient = 0.37). Among the 80 streets in the study area, the per capita green space location entropy of 11 streets is zero. A targeted site selection analysis for areas with park supply deficiencies led to the proposed addition of 11 new parks. After this optimization, the proportion of regions achieving supply–demand balance or better reached 80.38%, significantly alleviating the supply–demand conflict. This study reveals the characteristics of park supply–demand imbalance and spatial equity under different travel modes and time thresholds, providing a scientific basis for the precise planning and equity enhancement of parks in high-density cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengnan Zhao & Xirui Wen & Yuhang Ge & Xuning Qiao & Yu Wang & Jing Zhang & Wenfei Luan, 2025. "Assessment and Layout Optimization of Urban Parks Based on Accessibility and Green Space Justice: A Case Study of Zhengzhou City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2055-:d:1771422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2055/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2055/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2055-:d:1771422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.