IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5482-d1678788.html

RETRACTED: Navigating Mobility in Crises: Public Transport Reliability and Sustainable Commuting Transitions in Lebanon

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Azmat

    (Engineering Management Department, School of Infrastructure and Built Environment, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
    Cluster of Supply Chain Management, Karachi School of Business and Leadership (KSBL), Karachi 74800, Pakistan)

  • Mahmoud Ghalayini

    (Engineering Management Department, School of Infrastructure and Built Environment, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK)

  • Reem Hadeed

    (Engineering Management Department, School of Infrastructure and Built Environment, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK)

Abstract

Lebanon is grappling with a multifaceted transportation crisis driven by the high population density, limited public transit infrastructure, and overwhelming dependence on private vehicles. These longstanding issues have been exacerbated by compounding national shocks, including the October 2019 economic collapse, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the catastrophic Beirut Port explosion in August 2020. This study investigates the implications of Lebanon’s unreliable public transportation system amid the ongoing economic instability. Using a structured Likert scale survey distributed among residents, this research analyses the key determinants influencing the modal shift from private to public transport. The results identify three dominant factors shaping this transition: the deteriorating economic conditions, the sociocultural attributes of commuters, and the perceived reliability and adequacy of public transport infrastructure. Notably, 15% of respondents cited transport reliability as the main factor influencing their commuting behaviour, while only 3% attributed their decisions solely to financial pressures. However, a majority acknowledged a confluence of both. The sharp escalation in fuel prices, triggered by the financial crisis, has amplified public interest in alternative transportation options. These findings underscore an urgent need to revamp and modernise Lebanon’s public transport system as a strategic response to mitigate congestion, enhance accessibility, and reduce economic burdens on citizens. Addressing the infrastructural gaps and improving service reliability are critical to fostering a sustainable and inclusive mobility ecosystem in the face of persistent national adversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Azmat & Mahmoud Ghalayini & Reem Hadeed, 2025. "RETRACTED: Navigating Mobility in Crises: Public Transport Reliability and Sustainable Commuting Transitions in Lebanon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5482-:d:1678788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5482/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5482/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tang, Jinjun & Yang, Yifan & Qi, Yong, 2018. "A hybrid algorithm for Urban transit schedule optimization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 745-755.
    2. Redman, Lauren & Friman, Margareta & Gärling, Tommy & Hartig, Terry, 2013. "Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 119-127.
    3. Hensher, David A. & Stopher, Peter & Bullock, Philip, 2003. "Service quality--developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contracts," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 499-517, July.
    4. Lisa Winkler & Drew Pearce & Jenny Nelson & Oytun Babacan, 2023. "The effect of sustainable mobility transition policies on cumulative urban transport emissions and energy demand," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Lai, Wen-Tai & Chen, Ching-Fu, 2011. "Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers--The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 318-325, March.
    6. Chalak, Ali & Al-Naghi, Hani & Irani, Alexandra & Abou-Zeid, Maya, 2016. "Commuters’ behavior towards upgraded bus services in Greater Beirut: Implications for greenhouse gas emissions, social welfare and transport policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 265-285.
    7. Eugene Sogbe & Susilawati Susilawati & Tan Chee Pin, 2025. "Scaling up public transport usage: a systematic literature review of service quality, satisfaction and attitude towards bus transport systems in developing countries," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-44, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magalhães, David José Ahouagi Vaz de & Rivera-Gonzalez, Carlos, 2021. "Car users’ attitudes towards an enhanced bus system to mitigate urban congestion in a developing country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 452-464.
    2. Epstein, Bryan & Givoni, Moshe, 2016. "Analyzing the gap between the QOS demanded by PT users and QOS supplied by service operators," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 622-637.
    3. Mulley, Corinne & Clifton, Geoffrey Tilden & Balbontin, Camila & Ma, Liang, 2017. "Information for travelling: Awareness and usage of the various sources of information available to public transport users in NSW," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 111-132.
    4. Guirao, Begoña & García-Pastor, Antonio & López-Lambas, María Eugenia, 2016. "The importance of service quality attributes in public transportation: Narrowing the gap between scientific research and practitioners' needs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 68-77.
    5. Monchambert, Guillaume & de Palma, André, 2014. "Public transport reliability and commuter strategy," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 14-29.
    6. Paula Vicente & Abdul Suleman & Elizabeth Reis, 2020. "Index of Satisfaction with Public Transport: A Fuzzy Clustering Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Zhang, Chunqin & Juan, Zhicai & Lu, Weite & Xiao, Guangnian, 2016. "Do the organizational forms affect passenger satisfaction? Evidence from Chinese public transport service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 129-148.
    8. Mandhani, Jyoti & Nayak, Jogendra Kumar & Parida, Manoranjan, 2020. "Interrelationships among service quality factors of Metro Rail Transit System: An integrated Bayesian networks and PLS-SEM approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 320-336.
    9. Urbanek, Anna, 2021. "Potential of modal shift from private cars to public transport: A survey on the commuters’ attitudes and willingness to switch – A case study of Silesia Province, Poland," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Juan Oña & Rocío Oña & Griselda López, 2016. "Transit service quality analysis using cluster analysis and decision trees: a step forward to personalized marketing in public transportation," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 725-747, September.
    11. Vishwajeet Kishore Verma & Rajat Rastogi, 2026. "Examining transit performance evaluation approaches in the context of developing countries," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 229-284, March.
    12. Soza-Parra, Jaime & Raveau, Sebastián & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Cats, Oded, 2019. "The underlying effect of public transport reliability on users’ satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 83-93.
    13. Chee, Pei Nen Esther & Susilo, Yusak O. & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2020. "Determinants of intention-to-use first-/last-mile automated bus service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 350-375.
    14. Rong, Rui & Liu, Lishan & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2022. "Impact analysis of actual traveling performance on bus passenger’s perception and satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 80-100.
    15. Hudyeron Rocha & Manuel Filgueiras & José Pedro Tavares & Sara Ferreira, 2023. "Public Transport Usage and Perceived Service Quality in a Large Metropolitan Area: The Case of Porto," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, April.
    16. Claudia Burlando & Enrico Ivaldi & Alfonso Camporeale, 2016. "Un indicatore di qualit? percepita per il trasporto pubblico urbano: analisi delle macro-aree italiane," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 267-282.
    17. Ahmad Alkharabsheh & Sarbast Moslem & Laila Oubahman & Szabolcs Duleba, 2021. "An Integrated Approach of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Grey Theory for Evaluating Urban Public Transportation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Katrin Lättman & Margareta Friman & Lars E. Olsson, 2016. "Perceived Accessibility of Public Transport as a Potential Indicator of Social Inclusion," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 36-45.
    19. Peter Waerden & Emilie Couwenberg & Geert Wets, 2018. "Travelers’ preferences regarding the interior of public buses: a hierarchical information integration approach," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 529-543, December.
    20. Hugo Bois, 2016. "A new behavioral framework to analyze preference construction and decision processes within the modal choice," Working Papers 1608, Chaire Economie du climat.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5482-:d:1678788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.