IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5462-d1678351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fewer Clicks, Lower Emissions: Eye-Tracking Analysis of Eco-Friendly Navigation in Tourism Websites

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Chen

    (College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kexin Huang

    (College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

This study investigated the factors influencing search efficiency on travel websites, focusing on the effects of gender, website design, and the distribution of effective versus ineffective areas in page layout on visual search efficiency and task performance. Using eye-tracking technology, three experiments were conducted with 48 participants (19 males, 29 females; Mage = 26.73). Among the tested websites, TC exhibited the highest efficiency in task completion time, followed by QN and TN (40.10 s < 83.88 s < 95.27 s). Analysis of fixation distributions indicated that participants focused on effective areas at rates of 20.53% (TC), 55.31% (QN), and 62.42% (TN), underscoring the significant impact of effective and interference area distribution on search efficiency. These findings provide empirical evidence for optimizing travel website design through visual layout improvements to enhance information retrieval and user experience, with TC serving as a prime example of a site with lower cognitive load that better aligns with sustainable tourism principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Chen & Kexin Huang, 2025. "Fewer Clicks, Lower Emissions: Eye-Tracking Analysis of Eco-Friendly Navigation in Tourism Websites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5462-:d:1678351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5462/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5462/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Istrate & Victor Tulus & Robert N. Grass & Laurent Vanbever & Wendelin J. Stark & Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez, 2024. "The environmental sustainability of digital content consumption," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Claudia Townsend & Barbara E. Kahn, 2014. "The "Visual Preference Heuristic": The Influence of Visual versus Verbal Depiction on Assortment Processing, Perceived Variety, and Choice Overload," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(5), pages 993-1015.
    3. Adelina Zeqiri & Adel Ben Youssef & Teja Maherzi Zahar, 2025. "The Role of Digital Tourism Platforms in Advancing Sustainable Development Goals in the Industry 4.0 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mantovani, Danielle & Tazima, Deborah Iuri, 2016. "Arte visual e foco regulatório na avaliação dos consumidores," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 56(2), March.
    2. Aylin Cakanlar & Megan Hunter & Gergana Y. Nenkov, 2025. "Recycle right: How to decrease recycling contamination with informational point-of-disposal signage," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 781-803, May.
    3. Mona Frank & Philipp Brauner & Linda Engelmann & Martina Ziefle, 2025. "Mapping behavioral restraint: a dual perspective on individual actions for climate and environmental sustainability," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Adel Ben Youssef, 2025. "Twin Transition: Digital Transformation Pathways for Sustainable Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Fan, Xiaojun & Chai, Zeli & Deng, Nianqi & Dong, Xuebing, 2020. "Adoption of augmented reality in online retailing and consumers’ product attitude: A cognitive perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    6. Kei Kabaya & Kayo Tajima & Daisuke Ichinose & Michiko Asano, 2025. "Do different visual presentation formats encourage different choice behaviors? discrete choice experiment on urban park landscapes," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 27(1), pages 23-41, January.
    7. Shr, Yau-Huo & Ready, Richard C. & Orland, Brian & Echols, Stuart, "undated". "Do Visual Representations Influence Survey Responses? Evidence from a Choice Experiment on Landscape Attributes of Green Infrastructure," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258397, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Agung Artha Kusuma & Adi Zakaria Afiff & Gita Gayatri & Sri Rahayu Hijrah Hati, 2024. "Is visual content modality a limiting factor for social capital? Examining user engagement within Instagram-based brand communities," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Maesen, Stijn, 2025. "Introducing specialist private labels: How reducing manufacturers’ competing assortment size affects retailer performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 192-211.
    10. Eppink, Florian V. & Hanley, Nick & Tucker, Steven, 2019. "How Best to Present Complex Ecosystem Information in Stated Preference Studies?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 20-25.
    11. Á. Ní Choisdealbha & P. D. Lunn, 2020. "Green and Simple: Disclosures on Eco-labels Interact with Situational Constraints in Consumer Choice," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 699-722, December.
    12. Gabriele Pizzi & Gian Luca Marzocchi, 2020. "Consumer-defined assortments: application of card-sorting to category management," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(1), pages 67-84, March.
    13. Jungkeun Kim, 2017. "The influence of graphical versus numerical information representation modes on the compromise effect," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 397-409, September.
    14. Prediger, Maciel & Huertas-Garcia, Rubén & Gázquez-Abad, Juan Carlos, 2019. "Store flyer design and the intentions to visit the store and buy: The moderating role of perceived variety and perceived store image," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 202-211.
    15. Liu, Pengcheng & Xie, Qing & You, Yi & Dong, Qingqing, 2024. "A Study of Choice Overload Measurement in Food Consumption," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344272, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    16. Evangelos Christou & Antonios Giannopoulos & Ioanna Simeli, 2025. "The Evolution of Digital Tourism Marketing: From Hashtags to AI-Immersive Journeys in the Metaverse Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-41, June.
    17. de Jonge, Janneke & van Trijp, Hans, 2014. "Heterogeneity in consumer perceptions of the animal friendliness of broiler production systems," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 174-185.
    18. Kahn, Barbara E., 2017. "Using Visual Design to Improve Customer Perceptions of Online Assortments," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 29-42.
    19. Choudhary, Vidyanand & Currim, Imran & Dewan, Sanjeev & Jeliazkov, Ivan & Mintz, Ofer & Turner, John, 2017. "Evaluation Set Size and Purchase: Evidence from a Product Search Engine," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 16-31.
    20. Aurier, Philippe & Mejía, Victor D., 2020. "The interplay of brand-line assortment size and alignability in the sales of brand-lines and line-extensions of frequently purchased products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 163-175.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5462-:d:1678351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.