IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5409-d1676990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Green Funds Improve Corporate Carbon Performance? Firm-Level Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Pengcheng Wang

    (College of Business, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea)

  • Shanyue Jin

    (College of Business, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Intensifying challenges posed by global warming have elevated the urgency of improving corporate carbon performance and curbing carbon emissions. Green financial instruments serve a vital function in advancing corporate transitions toward environmentally responsible and low-carbon operational models. This research explores the influence of green funds on carbon performance at the firm level, aiming to clarify the micro-level mechanisms through which green financial instruments promote low-carbon development. The study utilizes data from Chinese listed companies spanning 2012 to 2021 and employs a TWFE regression model to empirically assess the effects. The findings indicate that green funds contribute to improved carbon performance. Furthermore, this effect is positively moderated by executive green awareness and financial background, indicating that managerial cognition and experience play a vital role in amplifying the benefits of green finance. Notably, green funds exert a stronger positive effect in highly polluting industries, suggesting that green financial resources should be directed not only to low-emission sectors but also to high-emission ones to improve their carbon efficiency. These findings extend existing literature by offering firm-level evidence on the effectiveness of green financial instruments and underscore the importance of targeted policy support to encourage green upgrading across all industry types.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengcheng Wang & Shanyue Jin, 2025. "Can Green Funds Improve Corporate Carbon Performance? Firm-Level Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5409-:d:1676990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5409/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5409/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5409-:d:1676990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.