IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p5076-d1669869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Carbon Emission Trading Pilot Policy Enhance Carbon Reduction Efficiency?

Author

Listed:
  • Yin Wang

    (Business College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Wanzong Wu

    (Business College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

Abstract

The creative breakthroughs in policy implementation by China hold essential practical importance for promoting global sustainability. The carbon emission trading (CET) pilot policy initiated in 2011 provides a quasi-natural experimental setting to investigate the dual impacts of market-incentivized environmental regulation on corporate carbon emissions (CEs) and capacity utilization (CU) enhancement. This study employs panel data from A-share listed manufacturing companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges spanning 2007–2022, constructing a corporate carbon reduction efficiency (CRE). A Generalized difference-in-differences (DID) approach is adopted to examine the policy effects. The study reveals that the execution of the CET pilot policy has shown a notable and enduring enhancement in corporate CRE, yielding the combined advantage of advancing corporate decarbonization and improving CU. These conclusions remain resilient despite thorough sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, the pilot improves CRE via three principal avenues: augmenting corporate innovation capabilities, increasing green investment intensity, and refining managerial practices. The impacts of CET pilots are most significant in state-owned firms (SOEs), capital-intensive industries (CIEs), eastern region enterprises (EEs), and sectors with little market concentration. The findings set essential empirical standards for assessing decarbonization initiatives and guiding social progress towards sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin Wang & Wanzong Wu, 2025. "Does the Carbon Emission Trading Pilot Policy Enhance Carbon Reduction Efficiency?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5076-:d:1669869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5076/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5076/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5076-:d:1669869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.