IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p5076-d1669869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Carbon Emission Trading Pilot Policy Enhance Carbon Reduction Efficiency?

Author

Listed:
  • Yin Wang

    (Business College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Wanzong Wu

    (Business College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

Abstract

The creative breakthroughs in policy implementation by China hold essential practical importance for promoting global sustainability. The carbon emission trading (CET) pilot policy initiated in 2011 provides a quasi-natural experimental setting to investigate the dual impacts of market-incentivized environmental regulation on corporate carbon emissions (CEs) and capacity utilization (CU) enhancement. This study employs panel data from A-share listed manufacturing companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges spanning 2007–2022, constructing a corporate carbon reduction efficiency (CRE). A Generalized difference-in-differences (DID) approach is adopted to examine the policy effects. The study reveals that the execution of the CET pilot policy has shown a notable and enduring enhancement in corporate CRE, yielding the combined advantage of advancing corporate decarbonization and improving CU. These conclusions remain resilient despite thorough sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, the pilot improves CRE via three principal avenues: augmenting corporate innovation capabilities, increasing green investment intensity, and refining managerial practices. The impacts of CET pilots are most significant in state-owned firms (SOEs), capital-intensive industries (CIEs), eastern region enterprises (EEs), and sectors with little market concentration. The findings set essential empirical standards for assessing decarbonization initiatives and guiding social progress towards sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin Wang & Wanzong Wu, 2025. "Does the Carbon Emission Trading Pilot Policy Enhance Carbon Reduction Efficiency?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5076-:d:1669869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5076/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5076/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Ke & Wei, Yi-Ming & Huang, Zhimin, 2016. "Potential gains from carbon emissions trading in China: A DEA based estimation on abatement cost savings," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 48-59.
    2. Daron Acemoglu & Philippe Aghion & Leonardo Bursztyn & David Hemous, 2012. "The Environment and Directed Technical Change," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 131-166, February.
    3. Hans-Werner Sinn, 2008. "Public policies against global warming: a supply side approach," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 15(4), pages 360-394, August.
    4. Olley, G Steven & Pakes, Ariel, 1996. "The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(6), pages 1263-1297, November.
    5. Yang, Lisha & Li, Zhi, 2017. "Technology advance and the carbon dioxide emission in China – Empirical research based on the rebound effect," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 150-161.
    6. Chen, Jiandong & Huang, Shasha & Shen, Zhiyang & Song, Malin & Zhu, Zunhong, 2022. "Impact of sulfur dioxide emissions trading pilot scheme on pollution emissions intensity: A study based on the synthetic control method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Zhang, Wei & Li, Guoxiang & Guo, Fanyong, 2022. "Does carbon emissions trading promote green technology innovation in China?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    8. Yuan, Xue & Dong, Yu & Liang, Liang & Wei, Yuting, 2025. "The impact of carbon emission trading scheme policy on information asymmetry in the stock market: Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    9. Li, Mengjie & Du, Weijian, 2022. "Opening the black box of capacity governance: Environmental regulation and capacity utilization of microcosmic firms in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Xuehui Yang & Jiaping Zhang & Lehua Bi & Yiming Jiang, 2023. "Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-24, March.
    11. Morrison, Catherine J, 1985. "Primal and Dual Capacity Utilization: An Application to Productivity Measurement in the U.S. Automobile Industry," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 3(4), pages 312-324, October.
    12. Di Zhou & Xiaoyu Liang & Ye Zhou & Kai Tang, 2020. "Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bing Zhou & Gong Zhang & Shulei Bi, 2023. "How Does Emissions Trading Affect the Efficiency of Enterprise Resource Allocation? Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    2. Jun Liu & Yu Qian & Huihong Chang & Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest, 2022. "The Impact of Technology Innovation on Enterprise Capacity Utilization—Evidence from China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Istemi Berk & Hakan Yetkiner, 2024. "Determinants of Energy Use in Turkish Manufacturing Industry: A Supply Side View," World Journal of Applied Economics, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 55-71, December.
    4. Patricia Laurens & Christian Le Bas & Stéphane Lhuillery & Antoine Schoen, 2017. "The determinants of cleaner energy innovations of the world’s largest firms: the impact of firm learning and knowledge capital," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 311-333, May.
    5. Jing Song & Mengyuan Li & Shaosong Wang & Tao Ye, 2022. "To What Extent Does Environmental Regulation Influence Emission Reduction? Evidence from Local and Neighboring Locations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-9, August.
    6. Wang, Weilong & Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The impact of energy-consuming rights trading on green total factor productivity in the context of digital economy: Evidence from listed firms in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Maogang Tang & Silu Cheng & Wenqing Guo & Weibiao Ma & Fengxia Hu, 2023. "Relationship between carbon emission trading schemes and companies’ total factor productivity: evidence from listed companies in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11735-11767, October.
    8. Peter K. Kruse-Andersen, 2019. "Directed Technical Change, Environmental Sustainability, and Population Growth," Discussion Papers 19-12, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    9. Zhang, Yanfang & Gao, Qi & Wei, Jinpeng & Shi, Xunpeng & Zhou, Dequn, 2023. "Can China's energy-consumption permit trading scheme achieve the “Porter” effect? Evidence from an estimated DSGE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    10. Durmaz, Tunç, 2018. "The economics of CCS: Why have CCS technologies not had an international breakthrough?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 328-340.
    11. Mikhail Golosov & John Hassler & Per Krusell & Aleh Tsyvinski, 2014. "Optimal Taxes on Fossil Fuel in General Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 41-88, January.
    12. Lan, Minghui & Zhang, Guangli & Yan, Wei & Qi, Fen & Qin, Lihua, 2024. "Greening through courts:Environmental law enforcement and corporate green innovation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 223-242.
    13. Michele Fioretti & Junnan He & Jorge Tamayo, 2024. "Prices and Concentration: A U-Shape? Theory and Evidence from Renewables," Working Papers hal-04631762, HAL.
    14. Alena Miftakhova & Clément Renoir, 2021. "Economic Growth and Equity in Anticipation of Climate Policy," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 21/355, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    15. Armon Rezai & Frederick Van Der Ploeg, 2017. "Abandoning Fossil Fuel: How Fast and How Much," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 85(S2), pages 16-44, December.
    16. Laurence Kotlikoff & Felix Kubler & Andrey Polbin & Jeffrey Sachs & Simon Scheidegger, 2021. "Making Carbon Taxation A Generational Win Win," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 62(1), pages 3-46, February.
    17. van der Ploeg, Frederick & Withagen, Cees, 2012. "Too much coal, too little oil," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 62-77.
    18. Chen, Ying & Wu, Wenjie & Yun, Yanwen, 2025. "The geography of pollution regulation and productivity," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    19. Michael Grubb & Jean-Francois Mercure & Pablo Salas & Rutger-Jan Lange & Ida Sognnaes, 2018. "Systems Innovation, Inertia and Pliability: A mathematical exploration with implications for climate change abatement," Working Papers EPRG 1808, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    20. Frederick Van der Ploeg & Cees A. Withagen, 2011. "Too Little Oil, Too Much Coal: Optimal Carbon Tax and when to Phase in Oil, Coal and Renewables," CESifo Working Paper Series 3526, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5076-:d:1669869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.