IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4927-d1665832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological vs. Traditional Aquaculture: Carbon Footprint and Economic Performance of Integrated Fish– Euryale ferox Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Jiayin Ling

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Studies and Low-Carbon Agriculture in Peri-Urban Areas, Guangdong Technology and Equipment Research Center for Soil and Water Pollution Control, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061, China)

  • Guozheng Li

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Studies and Low-Carbon Agriculture in Peri-Urban Areas, Guangdong Technology and Equipment Research Center for Soil and Water Pollution Control, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061, China)

  • Guodong Yuan

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Studies and Low-Carbon Agriculture in Peri-Urban Areas, Guangdong Technology and Equipment Research Center for Soil and Water Pollution Control, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061, China)

  • Liang Xiao

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Studies and Low-Carbon Agriculture in Peri-Urban Areas, Guangdong Technology and Equipment Research Center for Soil and Water Pollution Control, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061, China)

  • Liwen Shao

    (Guangzhou Sub-Branch of Guangdong Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Yaoyang Chen

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Studies and Low-Carbon Agriculture in Peri-Urban Areas, Guangdong Technology and Equipment Research Center for Soil and Water Pollution Control, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061, China)

  • Jianqiao Qin

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Studies and Low-Carbon Agriculture in Peri-Urban Areas, Guangdong Technology and Equipment Research Center for Soil and Water Pollution Control, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061, China)

Abstract

This study examined the carbon footprints of freshwater fish farming and Euryale ferox seed (gorgon fruit) production, comparing integrated ecological mode and traditional farming practices based on ISO 14067 and PAS 2050 standards. The ecological mode achieved a 24% lower carbon footprint per unit product than traditional practices, driven by reduced material and energy use. Key emission sources included aeration electricity, feed, and wastewater treatment for fish farming, fertilizers, insecticides, and drainage energy for E. ferox planting. The integrated model combining high-density fish ponds and E. ferox pond reduced the overall carbon footprint ( Micropterus salmoides : 4.342 kg CO 2 -eq/kg; E. ferox seed: 0.208 kg CO 2 -eq/kg) compared to traditional practices ( Micropterus salmoides : 5.672 kg CO 2 -eq/kg; E. ferox seed: 0.297 kg CO 2 -eq/kg). It also lowered production costs, increased profits, and mitigated GHG emissions by using E. ferox and lotus ponds as treatment facilities and reducing fertilizer use. The ecological model showed lower unit costs and higher profits ( Micropterus salmoides : 4.01 RMB/kg vs. 2.46 RMB/kg; E. ferox seed: 2.53 RMB/kg vs. 1.93 RMB/kg) than those of the traditional mode. This study underscores the potential of ecologically integrated modes to mitigate water pollution and carbon emissions in agriculture, offering a sustainable solution to meet the rising demand for aquatic products.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiayin Ling & Guozheng Li & Guodong Yuan & Liang Xiao & Liwen Shao & Yaoyang Chen & Jianqiao Qin, 2025. "Ecological vs. Traditional Aquaculture: Carbon Footprint and Economic Performance of Integrated Fish– Euryale ferox Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4927-:d:1665832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4927/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4927/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica A. Gephart & Patrik J. G. Henriksson & Robert W. R. Parker & Alon Shepon & Kelvin D. Gorospe & Kristina Bergman & Gidon Eshel & Christopher D. Golden & Benjamin S. Halpern & Sara Hornborg & Ma, 2021. "Environmental performance of blue foods," Nature, Nature, vol. 597(7876), pages 360-365, September.
    2. Wei Chen & Yuhui Xie & Chengxin Wang & Yong Geng & Xueping Tan, 2025. "Coupling Coordination Analysis of Water, Energy, and Carbon Footprints for Wastewater Treatment Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Xingqiang Song & Ying Liu & Johan Berg Pettersen & Miguel Brandão & Xiaona Ma & Stian Røberg & Björn Frostell, 2019. "Life cycle assessment of recirculating aquaculture systems: A case of Atlantic salmon farming in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(5), pages 1077-1086, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haochen Hou & Anqi Ren & Lixingbo Yu & Zhen Ma & Yun Zhang & Ying Liu, 2023. "An Environmental Impact Assessment of Largemouth Bass ( Micropterus salmoides ) Aquaculture in Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Koen Deconinck & Marion Jansen & Carla Barisone, 2023. "Fast and furious: the rise of environmental impact reporting in food systems," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(4), pages 1310-1337.
    3. Malak Anshassi & Timothy G. Townsend, 2023. "The hidden economic and environmental costs of eliminating kerb-side recycling," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(8), pages 919-928, August.
    4. Arianna Martini & Leonardo Aguiari & Fabrizio Capoccioni & Marco Martinoli & Riccardo Napolitano & Giacomo Pirlo & Nicolò Tonachella & Domitilla Pulcini, 2023. "Is Manila Clam Farming Environmentally Sustainable? A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Approach Applied to an Italian Ruditapes philippinarum Hatchery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-9, February.
    5. Bolster, Carl H. & et al. (+11), 2023. "Agriculture, Food Systems, and Rural Communities," USDA Miscellaneous 352114, United States Department of Agriculture.
    6. Naylor, Rosamond & Fang, Safari & Fanzo, Jessica, 2023. "A global view of aquaculture policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Basak Topcu & Goretty M. Dias & Sadaf Mollaei, 2022. "Ten-Year Changes in Global Warming Potential of Dietary Patterns Based on Food Consumption in Ontario, Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Claude E. Boyd & Aaron A. McNevin & Robert P. Davis, 2022. "The contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to the global protein supply," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(3), pages 805-827, June.
    9. Stefanie Colombo & Juan A. Manríquez-Hernández & Janet Music & Sylvain Charlebois, 2024. "Canadians’ Opinions and Preferences regarding Seafood, and the Factors That Contribute to Their Consumption and Purchasing Habits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, January.
    10. Ramin Ghamkhar & Christopher Hartleb & Zack Rabas & Andrea Hicks, 2022. "Evaluation of environmental and economic implications of a cold‐weather aquaponic food production system using life cycle assessment and economic analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 862-874, June.
    11. Enora Barrau & Mathias Glaus, 2022. "Structural and Environmental Performance of Evolving Industrial Symbiosis: A Multidimensional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Mzime Ndebele-Murisa & Chipo Plaxedes Mubaya & Chipo Hazel Dekesa & Angela Samundengo & Fanuel Kapute & Rodrigue Yossa, 2024. "Sustainability of Aqua Feeds in Africa: A Narrative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Taryn M. Garlock & Frank Asche & James L. Anderson & Håkan Eggert & Thomas M. Anderson & Bin Che & Carlos A. Chávez & Jingjie Chu & Nnaemeka Chukwuone & Madan M. Dey & Kevin Fitzsimmons & Jimely Flore, 2024. "Environmental, economic, and social sustainability in aquaculture: the aquaculture performance indicators," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Heimann, Tobias & Delzeit, Ruth, 2024. "Land for fish: Quantifying the connection between the aquaculture sector and agricultural markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    15. Ling Cao & Benjamin S. Halpern & Max Troell & Rebecca Short & Cong Zeng & Ziyu Jiang & Yue Liu & Chengxuan Zou & Chunyu Liu & Shurong Liu & Xiangwei Liu & William W. L. Cheung & Richard S. Cottrell & , 2023. "Vulnerability of blue foods to human-induced environmental change," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 1186-1198, October.
    16. Feng, Jing-Chun & Sun, Liwei & Yan, Jinyue, 2023. "Carbon sequestration via shellfish farming: A potential negative emissions technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Pietro Goglio & Sander Van Den Burg & Katerina Kousoulaki & Maggie Skirtun & Åsa Maria Espmark & Anne Helena Kettunen & Wout Abbink, 2022. "The Environmental Impact of Partial Substitution of Fish-Based Feed with Algae- and Insect-Based Feed in Salmon Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Sylvain Charlebois & Keshava Pallavi Gone & Swati Saxena & Stefanie Colombo & Bibhuti Sarker, 2024. "Assessing Consumer Implications of Reduced Salmon Supply and Environmental Impact in North America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Bernadette M. Clarke & Emma McKinley & Rhoda C. Ballinger, 2025. "UK Public Attitudes and Perceptions of Seafood Sustainability: A Case Study of the Marine Conservation Society’s Good Fish Guide," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-32, January.
    20. Gergő Gyalog & Julieth Paola Cubillos Tovar & Emese Békefi, 2022. "Freshwater Aquaculture Development in EU and Latin-America: Insight on Production Trends and Resource Endowments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4927-:d:1665832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.