IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v26y2022i3p862-874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of environmental and economic implications of a cold‐weather aquaponic food production system using life cycle assessment and economic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ramin Ghamkhar
  • Christopher Hartleb
  • Zack Rabas
  • Andrea Hicks

Abstract

Aquaponics, in which fish and plants are grown in a symbiotic closed‐loop industrial metabolism, are promising test beds to implement industrial ecology in food production at a commercial scale. These systems have the potential to enhance the environmental and economic performance of aquaculture systems by reducing the overall burden on natural ecosystems (i.e., reducing resource and emission‐based impacts per unit of food produced). To holistically evaluate the environmental and economic implications of aquaponics, specifically in a cold‐weather climate, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Economic Analysis (EA) were performed on a Midwestern United States aquaponic system, using data from 3 years of annual operation cycles with varying fish species production; tilapia, conventional walleye, and hybrid walleye. For the LCA, environmental impacts were quantified using 10 midpoint indicators. Assessments indicated that 1‐kg production of live‐weight tilapia, conventional walleye, and hybrid walleye resulted in 20.2‐13.8‐11.7 kg CO2‐eq, 23.0‐7.8‐3.9 g N‐eq, and 0.2‐0.3‐0.4 kg SO2‐eq, consecutively, using the investigated system. The most sensitive parameters for environmental impacts were heat, aquafeed, electricity, and infrastructure (in all scenarios). For EA, benefit to cost ratios (BCRs) and three other widely used indices were analyzed for production cycles. The BCRs were 0.47, 1.16, and 1.75 for tilapia, conventional walleye, and hybrid walleye, respectively (using a 10% discount rate and a 20‐year horizon), highlighting the necessity of optimizing both cash inflows (e.g., energy costs) and outflows (plant and fish revenues) to achieve practical enhancement of return on investments. The major cost contributors were infrastructure, labor, and heat (contributing to >89% of total costs for all cycles). Suggested steps for in‐effect improvement of the investigated aquaponic system's environmental and economic favorability include heat and infrastructure optimization by (a) applying effective heating strategies (e.g., advanced insulation techniques), and (b) expanding the system's operational lifespan (e.g., prevention of waste accumulation).

Suggested Citation

  • Ramin Ghamkhar & Christopher Hartleb & Zack Rabas & Andrea Hicks, 2022. "Evaluation of environmental and economic implications of a cold‐weather aquaponic food production system using life cycle assessment and economic analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 862-874, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:862-874
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13230
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13230?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsakiridis, Andreas & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Hynes, Stephen & Kilcline, Kevin, 2020. "A Comparison of Environmental and Economic Sustainability across Seafood and Livestock Product Value Chains," Working Papers 309507, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    2. Simon Goddek & Boris Delaide & Utra Mankasingh & Kristin Vala Ragnarsdottir & Haissam Jijakli & Ragnheidur Thorarinsdottir, 2015. "Challenges of Sustainable and Commercial Aquaponics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Alissa Kendall & Edward S. Spang, 2020. "The role of industrial ecology in food and agriculture's adaptation to climate change," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(2), pages 313-317, April.
    4. Xingqiang Song & Ying Liu & Johan Berg Pettersen & Miguel Brandão & Xiaona Ma & Stian Røberg & Björn Frostell, 2019. "Life cycle assessment of recirculating aquaculture systems: A case of Atlantic salmon farming in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(5), pages 1077-1086, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pietro Goglio & Sander Van Den Burg & Katerina Kousoulaki & Maggie Skirtun & Åsa Maria Espmark & Anne Helena Kettunen & Wout Abbink, 2022. "The Environmental Impact of Partial Substitution of Fish-Based Feed with Algae- and Insect-Based Feed in Salmon Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Parajuli, Samvid & Narayan Bhattarai, Tek & Gorjian, Shiva & Vithanage, Meththika & Raj Paudel, Shukra, 2023. "Assessment of potential renewable energy alternatives for a typical greenhouse aquaponics in Himalayan Region of Nepal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    3. Carlo Bibbiani & Alessandro Campiotti & Luca Incrocci & Alberto Pardossi & Baldassarre Fronte & Corinna Viola, 2016. "Aquaponic as sustainable innovation for food production," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 249-258.
    4. Iris Schröter & Marcus Mergenthaler, 2019. "Neuroeconomics Meets Aquaponics: An Eye-tracking Pilot Study on Perception of Information about Aquaponics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Mohammed S. Al-Zahrani & Hesham A. Hassanien & Fawaz W. Alsaade & Heider A. M. Wahsheh, 2023. "Effect of Stocking Density on Sustainable Growth Performance and Water Quality of Nile Tilapia-Spinach in NFT Aquaponic System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-12, April.
    6. Muller, A. & Ferré, M. & Engel, S. & Gattinger, A. & Holzkämper, A. & Huber, R. & Müller, M. & Six, J., 2017. "Can soil-less crop production be a sustainable option for soil conservation and future agriculture?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 102-105.
    7. Onozaka, Yuko & Honkanen, Pirjo & Altintzoglou, Themistoklis, 2023. "Sustainability, perceived quality and country of origin of farmed salmon: Impact on consumer choices in the USA, France and Japan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. Mark Schoor & Ana Patricia Arenas-Salazar & Irineo Torres-Pacheco & Ramón Gerardo Guevara-González & Enrique Rico-García, 2023. "A Review of Sustainable Pillars and their Fulfillment in Agriculture, Aquaculture, and Aquaponic Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Palma Lampreia Dos Santos, Maria José, 2018. "Nowcasting and forecasting aquaponics by Google Trends in European countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 178-185.
    10. Haochen Hou & Anqi Ren & Lixingbo Yu & Zhen Ma & Yun Zhang & Ying Liu, 2023. "An Environmental Impact Assessment of Largemouth Bass ( Micropterus salmoides ) Aquaculture in Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
    11. Kaburagi, Emi & Yamada, Mina & Baba, Takashi & Fujiyama, Hideyasu & Murillo-Amador, Bernardo & Yamada, Satoshi, 2020. "Aquaponics using saline groundwater: Effect of adding microelements to fish wastewater on the growth of Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris L. spp. cicla)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    12. Miranda, Bruno Varella & Monteiro, Guilherme Fowler A. & Rodrigues, Vinicius Picanço, 2021. "Circular agri-food systems: A governance perspective for the analysis of sustainable agri-food value chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    13. Goddek, Simon & Körner, Oliver, 2019. "A fully integrated simulation model of multi-loop aquaponics: A case study for system sizing in different environments," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 143-154.
    14. Philipp A. Trotter & Tristan Becker & Renaldi Renaldi & Xinfang Wang & Radhika Khosla & Grit Walther, 2023. "The role of supply chains for the sustainability transformation of global food systems: A large‐scale, systematic review of food cold chains," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1429-1446, December.
    15. Quevedo Cascante, Mónica & Acosta García, Nicolás & Fold, Niels, 2022. "The role of external forces in the adoption of aquaculture innovations: An ex-ante case study of fish farming in Colombia's southern Amazonian region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    16. Nurhayati Br Tarigan & Simon Goddek & Karel J. Keesman, 2021. "Explorative Study of Aquaponics Systems in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    17. Enora Barrau & Mathias Glaus, 2022. "Structural and Environmental Performance of Evolving Industrial Symbiosis: A Multidimensional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Bateer Baiyin & Kotaro Tagawa & Joaquin Gutierrez, 2020. "Techno-Economic Feasibility Analysis of a Stand-Alone Photovoltaic System for Combined Aquaponics on Drylands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Azhar M. Memon & Luai M. AlHems & Sevim Seda Yamaç & Muhammad S. Barry & Aftab Alam & Ahmed AlMuhanna, 2022. "Aquaponics in Saudi Arabia: Initial Steps towards Addressing Food Security in the Arid Region," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Suhl, Johanna & Dannehl, Dennis & Kloas, Werner & Baganz, Daniela & Jobs, Sebastian & Scheibe, Günther & Schmidt, Uwe, 2016. "Advanced aquaponics: Evaluation of intensive tomato production in aquaponics vs. conventional hydroponics," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 335-344.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:862-874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.