IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4917-d1665600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will the Development of the Digital Economy Impact the Clean Energy Transition? An Intermediary Utility Analysis Based on Technological Innovation and Industrial Structure

Author

Listed:
  • Li Guo

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Fengqi Du

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Min Tang

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

Abstract

In the context of global warming and the clean energy transition, the rapid development of the digital economy, a highly technology-intensive economic form, has an important impact on the clean energy transition. Examining how the growth of the digital economy has affected the renewable energy transition has broad implications for the creation of national policies, business planning and design, and everyday human behavior. The paper uses a two-way fixed-effect model to empirically investigate the impact of the development of the digital economy on the clean energy transition based on Chinese municipal panel data from 2013 to 2022. It also sorts out the intrinsic mechanism of the digital economy affecting the clean energy transition from a theoretical level. Finally, it tests the indirect effects of technological innovation and upgrading industrial structure using endogeneity analysis and a robustness test. The study finds that (1) digital economy development effectively promotes clean energy transition; (2) the digital economy influences the transformation of renewable energy through two intermediary channels: technological innovation and upgrading of industrial structures; (3) there is geographical variation in how the digital economy affects the growth of the clean energy transformation. Lastly, policy recommendations are provided for boosting investment in digital infrastructure, strengthening the digital technology base, and deepening and broadening the interaction of the digital and real economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Guo & Fengqi Du & Min Tang, 2025. "Will the Development of the Digital Economy Impact the Clean Energy Transition? An Intermediary Utility Analysis Based on Technological Innovation and Industrial Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4917-:d:1665600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4917/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4917/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bastida, Leire & Cohen, Jed J. & Kollmann, Andrea & Moya, Ana & Reichl, Johannes, 2019. "Exploring the role of ICT on household behavioural energy efficiency to mitigate global warming," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 455-462.
    2. Wu, Haitao & Hao, Yu & Ren, Siyu & Yang, Xiaodong & Xie, Guo, 2021. "Does internet development improve green total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Arundel, Anthony & Kabla, Isabelle, 1998. "What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 127-141, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen, Huwei & Liang, Weitao & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2022. "Urban broadband infrastructure and green total-factor energy efficiency in China," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Yangjun Ren & Ze Tian & Chao Liu, 2023. "Impact of the digital economy on urban green growth: Empirical evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Fang, Guochang & Chen, Gang & Yang, Kun & Yin, Weijun & Tian, Lixin, 2024. "How does green fiscal expenditure promote green total factor energy efficiency? — Evidence from Chinese 254 cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PA).
    4. Lei, Peng & Li, Xiaoyan & Yuan, Mingkang, 2024. "The consequence of the digital economy on energy efficiency in Chinese provincial and regional contexts: Unleashing the potential," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    5. Xu, Qiong & Zhong, Meirui & Li, Xin, 2022. "How does digitalization affect energy? International evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. Hao Lv & Beibei Shi & Nan Li & Rong Kang, 2022. "Intelligent Manufacturing and Carbon Emissions Reduction: Evidence from the Use of Industrial Robots in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Wang, Lianghu & Shao, Jun, 2023. "Digital economy, entrepreneurship and energy efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    8. Ma, Jinjin & Yang, Lin & Wang, Donghan & Li, Yiming & Xie, Zuomiao & Lv, Haodong & Woo, Donghyup, 2024. "Digitalization in response to carbon neutrality: Mechanisms, effects and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Yating Zeng & Xinyue Xu & Yuyao Zhao & Bin Li, 2023. "Impact of Digital Economy on the Upgrading of Energy Consumption Structure: Evidence from Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Zhu, Minglei & Huang, Haiyan & Ma, Weiwen, 2023. "Transformation of natural resource use: Moving towards sustainability through ICT-based improvements in green total factor energy efficiency," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    11. Xu, Ru-Yu & Wang, Ke-Liang & Miao, Zhuang, 2024. "The impact of digital technology innovation on green total-factor energy efficiency in China: Does economic development matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    12. Collinson S. & Narula, R., 2014. "Asset recombination in international partnerships as a source of improved innovation capabilities in China," MERIT Working Papers 2014-061, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    13. Junhong Qu & Xiaoli Hao, 2022. "Digital Economy, Financial Development, and Energy Poverty Based on Mediating Effects and a Spatial Autocorrelation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    14. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Umlai, Mohamed, 2023. "ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. Crass, Dirk & Garcia Valero, Francisco & Pitton, Francesco & Rammer, Christian, 2016. "Protecting innovation through patents and trade secrets: Determinants and performance impacts for firms with a single innovation," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-061, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Tom Broekel & Matthias Brachert & Matthias Duschl & Thomas Brenner, 2015. "Joint R and D subsidies, related variety, and regional innovation," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2015-01, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    17. Hwang, Hong & Peng, Cheng-Hau & Shih, Pei-Cyuan, 2014. "Parallel imports, product innovation and market structures," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 237-245.
    18. Rajeev K. Goel, 2023. "Seek foreign funds or technology? Relative impacts of different spillover modes on innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1466-1488, August.
    19. Chwiłkowska-Kubala, Anna & Cyfert, Szymon & Malewska, Kamila & Mierzejewska, Katarzyna & Szumowski, Witold, 2023. "The impact of resources on digital transformation in energy sector companies. The role of readiness for digital transformation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    20. Juan Tang & Fangming Qin, 2022. "Analyzing the impact of local government competition on green total factor productivity from the factor market distortion perspective: based on the three stage DEA model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 14298-14326, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4917-:d:1665600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.